Rome and China are based

Why are the Roman and Chinese civilizations that lasted thousands of years so based and that contributed to today's world? Tell me which civilizations are more based than China and Rome? Prove it to me. Prove me wrong. Everything outside of Rome and China are barbarians.

Attached: 1656893201449.png (878x653, 483.87K)

Attached: 1660068638230650.jpg (1069x1055, 240.05K)

Children of Abraham rule the world

>Tell me which civilizations are more based than China and Rome?
Mongols.
Worlds Largest unbroken empire.
No guns.
Eternal blue sky
No need for the degenerate settle civilisation.

Attached: 978EAF6B-D922-4A2A-A529-3CC08E42FDFE.jpg (905x906, 177.02K)

The Mongols adopted the Chinese art of warfare as well as the Chinese culture.

Rome = Russia (Third Rome)

Cope.
The Chinese adopted Mongol art of warfare and Mongolian culture.
The Yuan dynasty remains the best dynasty.

HNNNNNNGHHHHHHHHH

Keep telling yourself that.
>”””Gods chosen”””
>most anti-god country in the entire Middle East.
It’s not even that I hate your people, I just fine you pathetic.

Fair point.

Attached: e25.png (1680x688, 138.39K)

Although they are Slavic barbarians, they have well adopted Roman culture, customs and Roman religion, so they are worthy heirs of Rome, unlike today's Greece and Italy.

Attached: Ceasar-Putin.png (591x723, 431.72K)

>average chinaman was 4 foot and lived of rice paste
>weakest Mongol was 6 foot and lived primarily off Meat, diary and other animal products.
>the Roman army liked to hire troops from the rural and border provinces because they weren’t soft like the civilised peoples.

>roughly 4% of the population of China (so 8% of the male population) could serve in the army and the state could maintain its core functions.
>100% of the Mongol Male population could serve in the army and the Khaganate could maintain its core functions.

Attached: 1C733375-A56E-4DB9-8E8F-67882E71AB2F.jpg (1200x881, 318.63K)

China was, and never will be, at the level of Rome. Their entire history consists of dying and getting raped.

The real redpill was both of them were ossified tyrannies which are better off dead, except only one of them actually died.
Europe was vastly better off with the collapse of Rome. The empire was totally stagnant for centuries after Caesar Augustus

>390917427
>The real redpill was both of them were ossified tyrannies………
Stopped reading there.
You have a memeflag
Your shit opinion is irrelevant

Attached: 4FC50632-C8F0-429F-99B6-5E606EF31DF1.jpg (726x747, 122.23K)

Absolutely based ozbong.

Mongols were the best, Ghengis was the greatest leader and conquer in the history of earth, nobody comes close. If they made a historically accurate movie about his life it would be like a Hollywood parody, it's so unbelievable

Niggers

Attached: 1660385834482.jpg (1131x1600, 192.1K)

>>the Roman army liked to hire troops from the rural and border provinces because they weren’t soft like the civilised peoples.
False. Roman army prefetred chubby urbanites

The special military operation in the Teutoburg Forest completely failed. Completely

Attached: 144553.jpg (437x604, 86.34K)

What shall we do with Tiberius and Germanicus? They did a good job of defeating the Germans.