Why is accelerationism often associated with the far right?

Isnt the whole point of accelerationism like to be extremely progressive? If that is the case, then why is it oftentimes associated with the far right and conservatism Or am I just retarded

Attached: 198384.jpg (171x266, 12.13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thedarkenlightenment.com/the-dark-enlightenment-by-nick-land/
youtu.be/D-5iTcV-aDU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

what if i spent the years on Any Forums browsing Any Forums or Any Forums. in an alternate reality i wouldve been rich or fit or both

isn't Land a commie that wants to accelerate capitalism into some kind of demon?

Accelerationism leads to societal failure and the only group capable of seizing power in that state are hard right wingers

Accelerationists exist because of normies. You can’t really be a left wing accelerationist trying to accelerate conservative values… what’s the worst that happened we go back 20-25 year socially?

Boiling a frog is the lefts entire agenda; when it comes to guns, speech/ censorship, trannies, etc. it happens slowly over time, some people on the right want normies to feel the scorching heat all at once. Let me ask you a question, if a time traveler went back to the 80s or early 90s and showed the general populace trannies, child drag shows, maps, and other degeneracy, do you think the left would have any chance at legalizing gay marriage?

None of that progress was done by the will of the public, so yes it still would have happened.

People are deeply confused.

Accelerationism is based on the idea from Marx that communism was an inevitably, and capitalism would be the mechanism that gives birth to communism.
So from an Accelerarionist perspective, you should be encouraging hypercapitalism to accelerate the arrival of communism.

No one understands this though because no one actually reads Marx, they just pretend to.

Once the goyim know it's no longer business as usual

From what I've read of him, the future he anticipates is more like predatory cybernetic hyper-capitalism.

it's really funny how communisms root is steeped in liberalism.

thedarkenlightenment.com/the-dark-enlightenment-by-nick-land/

Accelerationism is not communist. There is no communist or utopian endgame. The acceleration process is just something that will happen driven by capitalist production and it will deterritorialize/disintegrate human societies.

This user is close.....

In a way, yes it was. The General public being ok with an entire month of degeneracy, child drag shows, celebrating gender mutilation, etc. is solely something that happened over time and would NOT have happened if people were shown the full effect beforehand.

I suppose, but I sure don't see anything ever being stopped, delayed perhaps.

I am willing to bet Nick Land is a fed and this is some sort of hyper niche containment psyop to set foundations for radical reactionary group

accelerationism is basically "hurrr durr lets speedrun our way to Babylon"
it's retarded

le anarchimst: chaos

le chudcelerator: my order from chaos

You're never going to change the current system through voting.
And you're never going to have your coup, day of the rope thing.
The only way to change is through collapse.
But then, you don't really have to accelerate, just let things run their course.
It's like a good tire fire, pop open a cold one and watch it burn.

No you are very much incorrect. Accelerationism is an intentional process.

The unintentional "something that will happen" that you are talking about is the type of thing that would fall under Marx's dialectic materialism.

Also I never said Accelerationism was communist, but I gave the interpretation of it from the Communist perspective which is where it originated.

Again as I said... actually reading Marx helps quite a bit here in understanding this.

I'm more than close user. How far are you willing to go?

I think you're underestimating how hard it would be to rebuild anything that resembles a system as functional as what we have today especially AFTER the massive trauma and death/destruction that follows a total systemic collapse of capital

it would be anarchy and it would be super super GAY, it would be a return to communal living/longhouse culture of zero personal space or individualism, this is exactly what (((they))) want and EXACTLY what Albert Pike "predicted" would happen in his world war letters to Mazzini
>Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of
revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned
with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction,
anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light
through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public
view.
>This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the
destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
think about it

>Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.
>This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
sorry that should be more readable

It doesn't really matter, because ultimately that's what's going to happen, it's an inevitability.
The only alternative to collapse is a civilization managing to secure its existence and impose its values, unchangingly, forever.
That's an impossibility, so if the collapse doesn't happen in 10 years, it'll happen in 100, or 1000, but it will happen.
And given the current state of things, the sooner the better. Whatever negative fallout comes from the collapse is worth it merely for the potential of a less insane system forming.

All that said, a lot of people, myself included, when they use the term collapse envision a breakdown of civilization, government and law. Problem is, the collapse of the current system might not go down like that. Accelerationists might get the great reset instead of Mad Max.

A leftist accelerationism would be to collapse society, take power AND still have the tech so now it is used for the wellbeing of everybody. It is so stupid that nobody with 2 braincells would believe that.

Marx did believe that communism would be inevitable, but people would need to learn and organize. In the accelerationism process, one of the effect is that the the worker is more and more explored and isolated (it is a process that is already taking place, but accelerated), in the hopes of a society explodes. When it explodes, there will be no mentally prepared workers to organize themselves on a communist utopia. Besides it, Marx recognized that a socialist phase would be necessary to the commie path to, among other things, indoctrinate the people

>how hard it would be to rebuild anything that resembles a system as functional as what we have today
Good. This system is what's killing your species. Its wheels are greased by the blood of children.

your method would kill hundreds of millions of children, stop moralfagging when you are literally calling for the destruction of the global system that billions survive off of

It's because the system only guards against the right wing. So that is all you hear about.

youtu.be/D-5iTcV-aDU

Because the whole NRX crowd is about dressing up the system's agenda in reactionary language.

kek ok faggot, what have the jews done to you all

I understand the concept of riding the tiger and striking when it is weak, but if we collapse fully the consequences will be so much worse than if we were to continue globohomo for another 50 years.
you do not want collapse, that is a satanic urge that is sprouting in the minds of every low IQ reactionary on the globe right now

>but if we collapse fully the consequences will be so much worse than if we were to continue globohomo for another 50 years.
t. schlomo

The alternative is species-wide slavery follwed by extinction. Don't say you weren't warned.