What stops Russia or China from actually stoking the flames for an US civil war, if they aren't already...

What stops Russia or China from actually stoking the flames for an US civil war, if they aren't already? Moscow or beijing could just thank Trump for handing them over unspecificed documents. Actually the US could do the same to try trump for treason.

Attached: 1652751291130.jpg (1281x720, 279.15K)

Pinocchio always lies;

therefor he is a nigger

I’m choosing A

a better logic bomb is merely the statement
>I am lying
by itself, with no explanation.
this gay shit OP is just ambiguous

The correct answer is "Among the hats Pinocchio owns, there is at least one that is not green."

All the given answers could be true, but are not necessarily true.

Eh, B is false, akshually

The civil war in the United States depends only on the citizens of the United States themselves. If they continue to ignore the fact that a grandfather suffering from dementia, controlled by secret elites, will continue to deprive democracy, then so it will be.
Two facts follow from Pinocchio's statement:
a) he has hats b) they are all green. Pinocchio always lies. So both of these facts will be false. Answer option C.

Pinocchio is colourblind

Russia has been sponsoring abd encouraging dissidents in the US since the cold war and never stopped. Russian agents even used stolen paypal accounts and false info to attempt to set up BLM protests and counter protests in order to spark violence.
Look up the "Internet research agency." It's a Russian front company behind a lot of disinfo and hacking attempts.

Ok, BlueAnon. The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back

What fucking dissidents? Wake up neo, you shit yourself. These are now your cream of society, supported by normis. And it's not our fault. These dissidents are supported not by us, but by your political elites.

There is no question
Just an observation split into lettered categories. All I know is op and Pinocchio are faggots.

e

Are you retarded?

E is the correct answer. The question says it's true that Pinnochio says (keyword here is "says") he has all green hats. It doesn't say that the content of his statement is true. It only says that it's true that he made A statement.

No. But you clearly are. Read the image again.

Well not really because he might not even own any hats. 'If Pinocchio owns any hats, at least one is not green'. There will always be the ambiguity.

None of the answers are truly "correct" in that they can be deduced logically, only some of the answers are viable and not excluded.
The only thing we can conclude is that whether or whether not Pinocchio has a collection of, or single, hat(s) - the entirety of his collection, whether fictional or not, will not be composed of green hats.

Completely wrong. The answer is A because if Stickboy doesn’t have at least one hat then the second statement will be trivially true. Source: I’ve actually studied math unlike you niggers

Can't conclude any of the statements because we have no idea whether he does or doesn't own hats. Unless we're supposed to go by the picture.

>If Pinnucchio doesn't have at least one hat then the statement saying that he has one hat (that happens to be green) is somehow true
I'm sure you're very proud of your degree and associated student debt. Bravo.

why are russians always smarter than every single western poster
it hurts bros

He's wearing a fucking hat in the image, so A has to be true

Dominion votes from dead people were counted.
President elect: F Inconclusive

Attached: 2000 Mules.jpg (1000x1389, 110.61K)

>He's wearing a fucking hat in the image, so A has to be true
Your assumption that the illustration accurately represents Pinocchio is unfounded.

I'm going with none, and that the macaque that posted this to facebook needs to double check his translation.

He is wearing a yellow hat. And your question is dumb, OP.

captcha: yarhpa