The missing puzzle piece

This whole Trump raid debacle has a missing puzzle piece that nobody seems to be focusing on:
>If the threat was nuclear, Joe Biden MUST have signed off on it as President
>If Joe Biden didn't sign off on it, then the threat must not have been nuclear, and they're lying

So either:
>Joe Biden was directly involved with the raid of Donald Trump, which brings this scandal all the way up the ladder
or
>The FBI is lying to the American public, and the entire thing brings into question the need for the institution

If this conclusion goes mainstream, they are FUCKED. Spread it.

Attached: that's all folks.jpg (1280x720, 115.91K)

Am I fucking crazy? Am I shadowbanned or something? This feels like the big one to me.

Attached: dd456tygh.jpg (457x321, 26.72K)

The shill candidate to replace the outsider that they're trying to bury, no thanks.

Biden isn't involved with shit
It's Obama

>If the threat was nuclear, Joe Biden MUST have signed off on it as President
that's not howvlaw enforcement works, retard

ever notice the background looks just like a prolapsed anus? Or the insides of a vagina?

That's nice, make them admit it. This isn't about being "correct" this is about catching them lying in public.

Either "joe" (really someone else) signed off in it, in which case the buck doesn't stop with Garloid, or they're lying.

So unelected officials make nuclear calls? That's what you're going with?

joe biden isn't involved in anything more than pooping his pants. women are running the country.

False premises. Biden is not into the judiciary and don’t need to sign shit

First Female President?

Attached: chrr543wsz.jpg (801x531, 64.24K)

>So unelected officials make nuclear calls?
holy shit you didn't know this?
HOLY SHIT

So the president would not be briefed or made aware of a possible nuclear level threat?
Source, don't just soiface.

The raid wasn't about nuclear secrets. That's just a (((cover story))) thanks to the judeo-bolshevik media in pic related covering for the judeo-bolshevik deep state (Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, etc and the glownigger intel agencies).

The raid was to get documents that Trump was struggling unsuccessfully to declassify and release for YEARS (remember the glowniggers threatening to impeach if he declassified the docs?). The docs would have exposed the dems and the glowniggers for essentially being a judeo-bolshevik cabal and its american version of the KGB.

Attached: 1659289720092837.jpg (7000x2694, 3.9M)

I'm aware that this is probably a lie, my point is bringing up the point that this implicates Joe makes them choose between unshielding him or admitting to lying.

Why would Joe biden need to sign off if the threat was nuclear? If anything the bigger the risk the less likely Joe biden would need to do anything as it gives the FBI more reason to make immediate action.

Attached: 20220811_123006.jpg (1647x1894, 349.08K)

>Why would the president of the united states be made aware of an impending nuclear threat
Uhh? Seems self evident. If this is really the case I want them to admit that too.

It’s a solid argument. The shills have been quick to pounce.

you are overcomplicating it. Biden knew about it because it was going to be big news so of course they told him about it. nothing else matters because the dems have spent the last 60 years lying about the FBI being independent and almost everyone still believes it.

Presenting the question in this way forces them to choose between two narratives that hurt them. Ask the question:
>Was the president made aware of the impending nuclear threat
Or
>Was this not an impending nuclear threat

>If the threat was nuclear, Joe Biden MUST have signed off on it as President
Ok schizo

Citation for non-presidents making calls on the nuclear level in the US?

>the FBI is continuously working to counter threats of every nature. the president is briefed regularly. We will not comment on the specific contents of presidential briefings.
theyve been doing this since before any of us was alive

>Runs a raid on former president
>Clearly overstepped, no substantial evidence
>"Oopsie, teehee! Guess you all want Trump again now!

They did this because they want to get more people voting Trump. Did you miss when they were caught campaigning for Trump backed candidates?

It's not about getting a straight answer out of them, it's about getting people to ask the question. If this line of logic was on the minds of people, they'd be fucked, there is no good answer from them.

Either they are lying or the buck doesn't stop with Garland.

>They've attacked a guy for 6 years straight because he's secretly one of them
>The guy who they let work with minimal obstruction is the TRUE maverick
lmao

the answer is that the president is briefed and they dont have to say anything more about it because thats classified

So they'll admit he knew when it was happening, okay. That's a great thing to have in the open. He can't just say "oh I didn't know I wasn't aware" like they're claiming.

no

>If this conclusion goes mainstream, they are FUCKED. Spread it.
lmao welcome newfag