DOJ will be UNSEALING Trump Warrant and Itemization

Search Warrant was given to Trump's lawyer on-site
Itemization of what was taken was given to Trump's lawyer on-site
Now the DOJ will make that information public

So what will the Trumptards be falling back on now as the talking point?

Attached: moving-goalpost.gif (480x480, 102.62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854.18.0_3.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Imagine believing anything a Jew AG would say

Attached: 1659085091078916m.jpg (540x1024, 88.18K)

"Presenting" is a much different word than "giving" and was used intentionally

...

Here's the DOJ unsealing request

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854.18.0_3.pdf

Whatever they want. It's the land of make believe.

inb4 communist judge denies the motion. "may cause violence" "will taint the investigation" or some shit. You way taint my taint leftfags.

26 boxes of Melania's panties

...

From the request, it looks like the only thing that could stop it is "objection by former President Trump"
But maybe not

>The Department did not make any public statements about the search, and the search apparently attracted little or no public attention as it was taking place.
because nobody knew about it
>The redacted Property Receipt listing items seized pursuant to the search
guess what they're going to redact...

...

Warrants aren't supposed to be sealed in the first place.
They exist to let the public and parties involved know law enforcement is empowered by the law to do something.

...

Based Scott Adams forced the DOJ’s hand by changing the public’s consciousness.

Attached: 796CD4D9-395A-4254-886E-36F12F641C02.jpg (1200x1147, 299.36K)

Generally the government does not make the warrants public for privacy reasons
Since the person is not actually charged with a crime, parading a warrant around and then having them not get charged could be considered slander
The warrant is given to the person though, and they're free to publish it

All that's going on here is that Trump has been talking shit and lying about the DOJ, so they're asking the courts for permission to release it themselves

Merrick Garland just said they gave them the warrant and the inventory list.
Trump's people have said they didn't.
Someones telling fibs.

08MAD

imagine thinking anything that Garland could have said would regain any ground or semblance of neutrality
every official government statement about this raid has been a lie from the start
you and your red guards overstepped
what you don't understand is that once the dopamine rush fades away from your pets, they'll go back to ACAB, so you'll have zero support of the populace
so you may as well go full mask-off and start rounding up dissenters, because no free society is going to stand for this anymore

Attached: 1635359754010.png (1360x3688, 1.39M)

Did garland say WHEN? cause maybe that's why he was late, lol

That's weird, I thought Chief Jew didn't even know about it.

He didnt say shit about the raid. unless I missed that

...

Well, one side would be breaking several federal laws and risking their careers and prosecution for violation of the Fifth Amendment
The other side is Trump, who can lie about it to the media all he wants

If you think the FBI didn't do this shit 100% by the books (because they knew they would be under a microscope) you're fucking insane

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Merrick Garfinkel can say whatever he wants, we know he is lying because he opened his mouth

When have they ever done anything 100% by the book

Thanks saved. Paired well with this one for a smoky oak flavor

Attached: 682965C8-3DBA-461B-B219-DECB50243030.gif (320x240, 1.83M)

>inb4 they do another unscheduled walking tour of a government building

...

>asks to turn private cameras off during the raid

>Feds
>Playing it by the books

Tell your boss the scripts their telling you to run aren't believable spook

Attached: Polish_20220810_144818376.jpg (1200x1130, 709.83K)

Under a microscope by who? The FBI? President? Congress?

>If you think the FBI didn't do this shit 100% by the books (because they knew they would be under a microscope
Oh yes the FBI never acts hastily or makes mistakes.
(if you can't tell I'm being sarcastic)
>you're fucking insane
There is a strong probability of this

Both funny but potentially misleading to NPCs.

yea I missed the first minute where he said they gave a copy of the warrant.
weird
thanks

...

Oh sure, sure...

Attached: 1608818880353.jpg (220x200, 12.85K)

Pssst. Trump was the inside mole. He baited the FBI into an over reaction to windfall his fundraising for his 2024 presidential bid. He has already broken records since the headlines first appeared. The FBI went in swinging their dicks around and found NOTHING and had to scrounge some bullshit together and leave so as to not leave empty handed. Now his base is at a fever pitch right before the midterms and only the most brainwashed commie isn't furious that a former president was trespassed for no good reason at all. His favorability is now insurmountable and his opposition continues to cake on more clown make up as they disappoint whatever legitimate electorate they had left.

Stay retarded, faggot. Lmao.

They need to unseal the affidavit used to obtain the search warrant
Garland is playing hide the weasel, and thinks you’re stupid, and in your case he’s right, tard

Attached: CC870719-1180-4F81-A672-7F34629DDE64.gif (328x184, 973.56K)

...

You should review the FBIs track record. They bombed the WTC and Noone received any punishment.

Imagine still believing in 4D chess moves when Trump has shown to be completely incompetent for literally years at this point