Taking Mariupol in as fast as they did is the single most impressive military achievement in our lifetimes
Taking Mariupol in as fast as they did is the single most impressive military achievement in our lifetimes
Nolan Rogers
Other urls found in this thread:
Jordan Smith
An isolated city, deep in enemy's territory against enemy with much more firepower. Let alone having no access to food.
It took ruskis fking 90 days to capture that city. How!?
Liam Ortiz
the number of defenders there and the size of the city make it extremely difficult to capture in as fast as Russia did -- yet they did it without missing a beat
Cooper Wilson
It's now a empty destroyed city. Well done.
Kevin Price
Mason Green
By flattening it? That's actually not impressive at all.
Hunter Green
how do you defeat an enemy? Why should any of it be preserved?
Owen Ross
Sieges usually take years bro
Jacob Robinson
Your joking. Your not joking?
They almost had to gas the steel works. Chemical troops. And then when they surrendered a missile found it's way to the POW camp. Because if there is one thing that this war is sure to prove. It's that orks are sore losers.
Jackson Rivera
What is the point of taking a pile of rubble?
David Powell
Ukrainians embedded themselves in civilian buildings, as per the Amnesty report.
Logan Cox
Great. In another hundred years the number 2 army of the world might make it to kiev.
Wyatt Rodriguez
How long did Baghdad take? On the other side of the world?
Retard.
Jaxson Smith
This is how "russkiy mir" looks like.
A pile of rubble.
Isaiah Davis
Jose Torres
Seething nato Jew kek
Cooper Diaz
Kevin Rivera
not really, its being rebuild
Noah Price
Samuel Ortiz
FYI Baghdad took 22 days to fall and the US had to get their troops to the other side of the planet and supply them. Unless OP is 20 years old this is retarded.
Kayden Campbell
baghdad had population of 7,6mln with 45 000 soldiers defending it unlike less than 10 000 ukrainians and battle for baghdad took 6 days and only 34 american casualties
sadly russia doesnt want to talk about their casualties anymore so we have to rely on ukrainian claims of ~6000 killed
Daniel Baker
Are you even real?
Anthony Bailey
It took them 90 days to capture it, now they're going to hold it for next 400 years. I say good bargain.
Jayden Lewis
Isaac Allen
Rope, soap, join the 41.
Joseph Cox
10+ years of sanctions and no fly zones, after a massive war that destroyed all civilian infastructure killing 1M innocent sandpeople
Landon Harris
I recently had drinks with a girl that was in Mariupole.
She said she slept through the shells going off. If this is the average Ukrainian no wonder Russia gets their shit kicked in.
Eli Smith
can confirm, going out from my rubble den to catch some rats for lunch currently, da
Ian Wood
baghdad fallen on 22 day of invasion but battle of baghdad was only 6 days long
Jace Robinson
>took longer than Stalingrad
of course the spaniard is impressed, 16 hours of siesta interrupted by 8 hours of sleep isnt breeding the fastest men
Austin Thompson
Baghdad was well defended and reinforced, taking it out was more impressive than this by every measure. Whether a bunch of people starved in 10 years prior doesn't matter. Iraq had just as much AF left as the Ukraine, which in both cases was basically fuck all. Pretty similar in the AA situation which is minimal. It's also irrelevant.
Joseph King
Yeah good point.
I mean it's something but OP is smoking drugs.
Jonathan Wright
Do you at least have a flush toilet?
Because man. You guys need to figure out plumbing.
David Brown
> innocent sandpeople
post monkeypaw
Julian Russell
>Ukrainians embedded themselves in civilian buildings, as per the Amnesty report.
pretty much that. Or you forgot picrel?
Ryder Fisher
lmao is it that video where guys are speaking with ukrainian accent
Ayden Nelson
Actually yeah assuming you go from Nov 19 when the Germans captured up to the Volga to the end, it actually did take longer.
Ok it's not impressive at all.
Camden Parker
toilet? is that this black thing they make roads from? called ass-volt something? no?
Grayson Gomez
Mariupol is a.contender for biggest russian embarassment of the war so far
Jeremiah Taylor
the ukrainians defending the ukrainian city took shelter in ukrainian buildings when the city was sieged ?
NAAAAAAH, REEEEAAAALLLYYYY ????
whoa and here i am, thinking that you go out on the fields and show the enemies your bare chest, when youre in a siege
Hudson Roberts
>impressive
LMAO. Would you call the US Army taking Tijuana Mexico after 90 days of massive losses "impressive"?
Henry Carter
I remain convinced that you pricks would do this to a vet.
Kek.
Benjamin Myers
Russia has a world class army, probably the best in the world at the moment. I dont see the US fighting a ground war and winning with overweight niggers, trannies and hysterical women on the front line. Thats why they lost the Afghanistan ground war to a few untrained sheep fuckers. Whereas Russia is a disciplined and well organised fighting force with world class weapons. Its so embarrassing for the US and the GAE and EU as well to be shown up by Russia. I think they did an amazing job.
Liam Cooper
In our lifetimes.
Aiden Roberts
Oh thank god i thought you were a real person for a bit. You got me. Good joke.
Xavier Nguyen
Ukrainians put their own civilians in harms way because they didn't think the civilians in Mariupol were human
Connor Evans
pfffft, even then the americans blitzing Iraq is far more impressive
>in our lifetime
retard, nothing comparable happened in our lifetime, and even then the siege was a fucking embarassing shitshow for roosya
Leo Carter
A better comparison would be Fallujah, took them April to December 2004. Also they were fighting Arabs, that's about five times easier than fighting Slavs.
Ethan Butler
whoa there user, youre telling me when you invade a city, theres Civilians there ? In a city ? really ?
youre shitting me, arent you ?
im slowly beginning to think that spaniards are retards
Camden Mitchell
you control the land and the people who don't want you there all left. it was almost all 1970s commie blocks anyway. wgaf. all the ukrainians would have left and you can move your own people there to make a shitty industrial town.
yes there are more financial costs, but long run it is better in theory
Jeremiah Butler
Fighting a NATO-equipped, modern military (the strongest in Europe) vs underpaid and underfed retards in the desert
There is a reason why every foreign fighter leaves with their tail between their legs, they're not used to fighting an actual enemy
Taking Mariupol as fast as Russia did is incredible
Liam Price
There were no Ukrainians in Mariupol, you dumb fuck.
Even Azov is just Russians.