Why doesn’t Donald Trump release the search warrant?

If it's all a 'witch hunt' like he says then why doesn't he just do that? It would be easy and clear his name.
Unles...

independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fbi-search-warrant-mar-a-lago-b2142692.html

Attached: donald-trump.jpg (1200x1200, 125.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283
youtube.com/watch?v=SY7oGsiUHKE&ab_channel=BreitbartNews
youtube.com/watch?v=wmLbhgGM_Cw
archive.
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't get it. If it exists, then it's a legal raid (if a bit dubious, octuply so since he's a very recent former president) or it doesn't exist, and it was illegal. What does releasing the warrant prove? What is there to clear his name of?

His lawyers already made a statement. It's sealed, and he isn't allowed to see it.

They were shown the warrant, not given a copy.

He doesn't want anyone to know a judge he appointed signed off on the raid. cucked by his own judge.

>It's sealed, and he isn't allowed to see it.
Is this true?

>One person who could release a copy of the warrant is Donald Trump himself. His legal team would be in the possession of it, Politico notes, and most likely this would be through his lawyer Christina Bobb who was present at Mar-a-Lago on Monday – though she claims she was not permitted to observe the search and was not given a copy of the warrant but had seen it. She claims the agents on site initially refused and described the document as “thin”.

If there is any reticence on the part of the Trump team to publish the warrant, should it be in their possession, it is likely because a court-authorised FBI search to reclaim governmental materials would only be granted if the documents were of such national security sensitivity that there was no question they should be reclaimed, even for safekeeping.

It is highly unlikely that the FBI would apply for a warrant without solid reasoning that there was a criminal violation behind the retention of documents supposed to be in the National Archives. There are reports of an informant at Mar-a-Lago who may have tipped off the bureau.

A warrant would list the alleged crimes of which Mr Trump or his team are accused. If the highly sensitive documents in question are related to national security, then that could fall foul of the Espionage Act. That would be difficult for the Trump team to spin and could dampen the rush of support from the wider Republican Party he has seen since Monday night.

If they wished, the Trump team could also defuse some of the controversy by showing a full inventory of documents in their possession and those sought by the National Archives — should they be not of a sensitive national security nature

That's what I heard too. They wouldn't let them see or or be present while they riffled through his personal belonging in his office and then through his wife's panty drawer.

Because the documents don't actually belong to an archive. It's all wrong. Par for the course.

It's not sealed. He has it in his possession and refuses to release it because it would be embarrassing.

>What does releasing the warrant prove?

Two things, that the warrant was over some archive data which means this was an over reaction. Latest Newsweek article leans this way

newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283

Second is that warrants have a defined scope. Eric Trump.already accused the FBI of exceeding the scope of the warrant and that they have video evidence as the Truno Security team refused to turn off the security cameras.

Its a game of cat and mouse and the deep state is already back peddling and doing damage control

>Is this true?

No, when Trumps lawyer inaisted the FBI showed it from 10 ft away and refuses to hand over a copy.

The documents were 'marked as classified national security information' and were being deliberate withheld in the safe. It's not an over-reaction. It's a very clear cut violation of the presidential records act.

youtube.com/watch?v=SY7oGsiUHKE&ab_channel=BreitbartNews

Only if it was actually true. The FBI is only guessing he has something if they aren't LYING.

Man, I hate the word "deepstate". It used to mean shadowy shit like Jay Edgar Hoover, but the modern government's actions are made by teams of incompetent and delusional people sitting around a large oval table. Then a secretary compiles the directions that are to be followed, it's brought to a competent white man who sold his soul to the Jew. He distils it into actual actions to be taken, and either he commands people directly, or the list of actions he made is given to on the ground commanders.

Source is...?

So if it isn't true, what's the harm in releasing it then?

>It is highly unlikely that the FBI would apply for a warrant without solid reasoning
No, their credibility regarding Trump disintegrated when they not lied about the provenance of the Steele dossier obtaining the FISA warrant, but also lied to have the FISA court renew the warrant multiple times.

newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283

>In February, Archivist David Ferriero testified before Congress that his agency began talking with Trump's people right after they left office and that the Trump camp had already returned 15 boxes of documents to the Archives. Ferriero said that in those materials, the Archives discovered items "marked as classified national security information," unleashing further inquiries as to whether Trump continued to possess classified material.

Why didn't he release his tax returns?
Why didn't he lock up Hillary?
Why didn't close tax loops holes like he promised?
Why didn't he _____?

The man is a chronic liar. His entire political career has been deflecting with easily disproved lies.

Fuck off Melbourne, you're drunk.

he's working for the jews like the rest

Because we are in a societal state where everyone is assumed guilty when a government organization accuses you and they will hold you from trial until you've lost all your opportunities.

I hope Russia drops a nuke on you. I hate your fucking people.

Nice try but not gonna work.

Deep State has always referred to part of the federal government that doesnt change with elections. It was openly talled about as a positive until the public started souring on the unelected officials and their fuckery.

>No, when Trumps lawyer inaisted the FBI showed it from 10 ft away and refuses to hand over a copy.
That's what they're saying, why didn't they video any of this if it really happened? They have every right to and his legal team know that more than anyone.

Why does the truth make you so mad? No democrat could give a shit if Biden committed a crime and was seeing legal heat for it. The cult of personality and persecution around Trump is messed up.

why are you a literal retard?

Attached: TerryDavisBillboard.jpg (2048x1152, 270.59K)

>what's the harm in releasing it then?
Ask the FBI nigger faggot

Attached: spottheretard.png (720x594, 721.2K)

You make mad, democracy destroyer. You do. You are problem.

>incoherent miga screeching

That's accurate and doesn't go against what I said.

>It's not sealed. He has it in his possession and refuses to release it because it would be embarrassing.

The Mueller Investigation did find evidence enough to indict Trump however, even though he is no longer POTUS we are not indicting him because of “reasons”.

You'd think you all would figure out by now that Trump does whatever keeps him in the press. Even if it's something as minor as a tweet or pissing people off for not following an expected procedure or disclosure.

That’s yesterday talking point from dnc memo, you have to get the new one then post.
Now try and keep up and quit staring at your mutilated genitals

Unless...

Attached: trumpx1.jpg (1690x692, 222.9K)

>another thread of this shit.
Time to filter Any Forums.

Attached: AED125BD-D8A2-44A9-AD76-C8178CE0CE90.png (827x590, 437.94K)

I hope your whole family gets cancer. You're nothing but a wicked little nonce that wants to destroy things better than yourself. You are a coward.

If you ask any Trumpie, they'll say he was completely exonerated by Muller, because that's what Trump told his flock. Meanwhile if you actually listen to what Muller said, they found evidence of numerous crimes but could not indict a sitting president. Muller indicted 34 other people though as part of that enquiry, including 6 Trump associates.

That's not a very nice thing to say. Just trying to wake you up to reality

kek
youtube.com/watch?v=wmLbhgGM_Cw

Attached: BidenKamalaBBB.jpg (680x554, 61.57K)

A copy of it was sent to his lawyer. The evidence that instigated the warrant is sealed. There's basically no point, and would actively harm his chances.

archive. ph/aJBUx

kek - found the groomer jew

Attached: JewCoupAntiTrump3.jpg (1462x1303, 409.15K)

so why not release the cop cam of it happening if it did happen then?

Indicting a former president for his actions as president would open up a can of worms I dont think anyone wants to open.

Why the fuck dont you ask why someone was so busy looking for so much inconsequential shit, faggot?

Trump could fuck up a wet dream

Attached: Screenshot 2022-08-11 031536.jpg (1840x392, 115.75K)

>Now try and keep up and quit staring at your mutilated genitals

But the doctor told it would look like the

one in the picture. Now I have hair

growing in it and the poop smell won’t

stop.

God damn it. I've seen this and the other Norm pictures being posted to hell recently. Either stop posting just the two pictures, or post a wider variety of Norm media and content. He's done a lot of funny and insightful things but you post the done to death one.

But raiding his house is ok

Attached: B3B05716-81C2-4B78-BFBA-7CB4A592C398.gif (408x224, 1.68M)