>What is Fascism
Fascism is a political movement that originated after a split with the Italian Socialist Party in 1914. The cause of disagreement was intervention in the great war. The fascists believe the war was progressive in furthering the interests of revolutionary socialism.
>Does Fascism exist today?
Not in any measurable respect. Fascism today exists only in theory, but in praxis it is non-existant.
>What are the aims of Fascism?
The same as it was a century ago. To control the state, that is, the collective society, which is in our hands wholly.
>What is the class character of Fascism and what is the relationship of Fascism with the class struggle?
Fascism has never denied the existence of the class struggle. We deny the existence of two classes, because there are many more than two classes. We deny class based internationalism, because the preservation of European society triumphs over this fictitious 'solidarity' with other groups. Fascism aims to champion the fighters and producers.
>What does Fascism hope to achieve in the economic sphere?
Subjugation of private property behest of the interests of the state, up to and including economic planning subject to hierarchical corportavist discipline.
>What is Fascism's stance on individual freedom?
In the existing society all individual freedom is an illusion and all are slaves to the money pigs of capital.
>Where can I read more about Fascism?
bibliotecafascista.blogspot.com
>Who are the most influential thinkers in Fascism?
Karl Marx, Georges Sorel, Benito Mussolini, and Giovanni Gentile
/fg/ Fascism General
fuck cucksolini, faggot cost germany the whole war
>Karl Marx, wasn't he a socialist? Is Fascism not opposed to Socialism?
It is necessary to distinguish between socialism and socialism—in fact, between idea and idea of the same socialist conception, in order to distinguish among them those that are inimical to Fascism. It is well known that Sorellian syndicalism, out of which the thought and the political method of Fascism emerged—conceived itself the genuine interpretation of Marxist communism. The dynamic conception of history, in which force as violence functions as an essential, is of unquestioned Marxist origin. Those notions flowed into other currents of contemporary thought, that have themselves, via alternative routes, arrived at a vindication of the form of State—implacable, but absolutely rational—that finds historic necessity in the very spiritual dynamism through which it realizes itself.
-What is Fascism? Giovanni Gentile
>What is Fascist attitude towards socialism?
Vulgar socialism is one of the enemies of Fascism, not because it is socialism, but because it is a phantom and a lie. Those who claim to represent socialism and the interests of workers are false prophets decieving the masses. Corporativism, a temperament correction and far more accurate than one could expect from communism.
>How will you achieve Fascism?
Out of the barrel of a gun. That is, through war.
Fascism is shit
Mussolini was shit
Italy since its unity is shit
you are retarded if you actually believe this.
what do you have against the risorgimento?
Uniting Italy was literally anglojews' work
Fuck united Italy, this country will never be good until we go back to be smaller states
>Not in any measurable respect.
This is not true. Fascism is literally militarized unity or revanchist reclamation of "lost land", spearheaded by an authoritarian government working in the interests of assembling the fasces again.
OH WAIT.
>This is not true. Fascism is literally militarized unity or revanchist reclamation of "lost land"
so every nationalist movement ever since the dawn of history was fascist?
makes no sense.
italy only truely uniified after WW1
>so every nationalist movement ever since the dawn of history was fascist?
yes
Uniting the nation under a nationalist cause is fascism. Mussolini merely inserted his marxist tendencies and called it something else for optics, and he also did it because no one would recognize his claims on the literal Rome so he had to come up with something else to rebuilt the same Rome, but it was always just nationalism plus socialism.
Or as they called it to the north, National Socialism. The revanchist reclamation of lands and dissent against the Versailles treaty, plus socialism for the good of the volk and not of the "international worker", is fascism, which is also national socialism. Which is modern day Putinism, with a bit more of autarkic corporatism and a bit less of the socialism part. Still anti-globalist and anti-neoliberal nontheless.
Listen it's very easy to see whether that's true or false. Just look at the jews whose entire existence literally revolves around the obsession with fascism. If they start scattering away, then it's more likely than not that this is the case.
>loses to niggers in africa
>loses niggers in greece
>hitler has to actually free him from his own people
he was a joke
>italy only truely uniified after WW1
Italy never united
We have the famose phrase "We united italy, now we must make italians" and they never could do that
We have too much culture, too many differences in how we approach life, work, etc
Venice Itself was independent for 1100 years
Florence, Milan, Naples, Sicily. You can't put all these people together, it will work maybe in a thousand years
He was indeed, 100%
A fucking clown, who would do tv stunts to mantain his retarded heroic aura with one of the most powerful propagandas in history (Istituto Luce)
>yes
No.
>Uniting the nation under a nationalist cause is fascism
So the French Revolution was Fascist? The Chinese Revolution was Fascist?
You're using that word too broadly, and removing the meaning from it.
>Just look at the jews whose entire existence literally revolves around the obsession with fascism. If they start scattering away, then it's more likely than not that this is the case.
Jews were actually over represented in the Italian Fascist movement.
>socialism for the good of the volk and not of the "international worker", is fascism, which is also national socialism. Which is modern day Putinism
Lol, no.
>Italy never united
Certainly not with that attidude!
Ask any other italian if he thinks venetians and sicilians are brothers, if people from Naples and Trieste, Genoa and Naples.
We are not and we never will be. I'm not saying one group is better than the other, we're just basically another civilization. Venetians were on their land and have been on their land for at least 1600 years and have been independent for at least 1100.
Italy is a young country, 150 years is absolutely nothing in historical terms
Finally an idiology I can get around
>>Does Fascism exist today?
>Not in any measurable respect. Fascism today exists only in theory, but in praxis it is non-existant.
Think again
>So the French Revolution was Fascist? The Chinese Revolution was Fascist?
What?
Neither the French nor the Chinese Revolution (if you're talking about the communist one) were fascist.
The French Revolution was an international movement, quite akin to communism, that spread itself regardless of nationality and borders by force. Quite akin to the Soviet Union, which by the way, took its inspiration from the French Revolution, and Marx was the ideological continuation of that type of "egalitarianism". The French Revolution killed the monarchy and installed the bourgeoisie class, and the Communist revolution killed both of them and installed the peasant class. This is a ladder in the same direction, just one step further than the prior one.
To put it into a more ideological and philosophical framework, the French and Communist revolutions champion (and stem from) an idealistically-rationalist approach that equality exists and should be enforced as a liberating march so that the subjective individual feels freer, whereas the Italian and German intellectuals and specifically Heidegger went the other route and remained skeptical of subjectivism, opting for the existentialist approach. Existentialism is all about facing the nihilistic absurdity of life and creating, or finding, a meaning on top of it. One such meaning being your nation and your race, hence fascism and national socialism.
Looking at Putin right now, I fail to see him provide any of the ideals of the French revolution, certainly not the egalitarianism. He uses them as a shield by claiming that he is an antifascist denazifier, but when you look closer, you notice that the only ideal that his regime has provided so far, is the unification of the "Russian people" who were "oppressed by the Ukrainians and their American masters" and who are championed together against "neoliberal ideals such as trannies". That IS the German nationalism of the last century superimposed onto Russia.
p.s Russia also claims that it is the Third Rome and is full of eagle imagery, and as you should know as a Bulgarian, threatened us with war if we were to occupy Constantinople because they themselves wanted to do it first and proclaim that they're the new Eastern Roman Empire.
Following the above, one could even make the argument, completely unironically with a straight face, that Putin is closer Mussolini himself than any other leader and literally wants to reform the same Rome that Mussolini wanted to, but offset to the east. If this isn't fascism then I don't know what is and I seem to have a flawed understanding of what it is supposed to be.
Why did Hitler destroy fascism? Just imagine what could have been