Indian aren't Aryan confirmed by genetics

Lost opportunity. Would have been good.

Apparently the Brahmin class was the only Indo-European class with access to Indo-European women.

The rest didn't import women from the Indo-European steppes to be their wives. Leading to the present culture.

Good morning sirs!

Attached: 1658476559500943.jpg (1080x1148, 156.81K)

>Indians larp as aryan
nigga you can't even pronounce aryan right

The advanced Indus Valley Civilization existed before the Indo-Europeans came.

>Brahmins are mostly white skinned
objectively false. literally just look up brahmins on google images and tell me how many of them seem white skinned to you.

They were. Back in the day before they intermarried more with the local population. But as some have testified here. Some are still white skinned.

sure, that is true, but the word Aryan is purely an indian and doesn't mean a race. It literally means "noble" or a person who follows Vedic dharma. I literally went to a school that is part of the Arya Samaj. It is not a race.

There is no such thing as 'Aryan' race. It is a pseudo-scientific Nazi bullshit.

They can be saved

youtu.be/UZlGzRLdV6c

Attached: Indian Catholic .jpg (720x896, 113.09K)

Indeed. I think originally it probably did have a racial implication since the Ruling castes thought of themselves that way.

And may have had a high culture and Spirituality that cultivated those noble values and spiritual vitality. Until Buddhism I think and other thinkers just discarded the racialism.

Since the Spiritual isn't strictly ethnic.

you'll find as many light skinned lower castes as upper castes. but most adivasis and untouchables are dark. You are not brahmin based on race, in fact the people with most european blood are a lower caste whose name i forgot.

True. This is a religious Christian holy war not a race war

Attached: A Christian warrior chief .jpg (646x395, 55.27K)

You are right. Although I did quote the author who did talk about the race of the Brahmin. Originally was of that racial type.

But has opened up the ranks to the meritorious.

>in fact the people with most european blood are a lower caste whose name i forgot.

Indeed. European DNA isn't immunity from spiritual and moral degradation.

I see plenty of white leftists who fit the description of a degenerated people.

But I suspect being a Steppe people originally they were kept from the corruptions of Urban CIvilization originally.

Christianity is a cult. It derives its story from astronomical events.

And the real person of Jesus and Pontus Pilate. And actual Roman Governor.

the ruling caste wasn't brahmin, it has mostly been kshatriya. brahmin's were basically elites in society, just like how the pope was kind of above everyone in europe (idk exactly), but the ruling class wasn't priests.

Christianity derives its background story from Julius Caesar.

Also Shroud of Turin belongs to Jacques deMolay.

Alright sure. I think the Brahmins retained that racial type longer because they had Indo-European wives. And a far more balanced sex ratio

Unlike the other castes who intermarried and became what they are today.

Shroud of Turin is real supernatural stuff. From the middle ages.

the first brahmins probably had the most european blood, but i'm still not sure if they had a racial hierarchy back then. the caste system was formed like 2000 years (not sure of the years but it was a long time) after the indo-european migration.

Aryans weren't Nordic. They weren't Indian or Iranian or anything like that either, they weren't European or Turks or any retarded nonsense that internet virgins can come up with. They were the predicate for all these categories (even Turks).
Any discussion about the Aryans inevitably becomes an orgy of retards putting carts before horses.

The Vedic Scriptures in regards to Indra and the original culture did seem to have a racialist theme to it.

Dunno how accurate it is. But I don't think they are necessarily noble people.

When a population is used to Cattle Rustling and having to be aggressive to protect their herds.

Its leads to a Martial culture. And I wouldn't be surprised if the Vedic war against the Dasyus. Is just a Warrior people encountering people different to them.

What evidence is there Nordic people introduced writing to Indians when all evidence points to the fact Nordic people didn't have writing until they interaxted with Romans? The Runic Alphabet looks to be influenced by Etruscan script. We don't have runic inscriptions predating Roman contact according to records.

I am not anti-Nordic, but no evidence suggests Nordic people invented civilization. The presence of blond hair in ancient Greece does not mean Nordic anymore than the presence of brown hair in Sweden means Greek. Nordicism is just not true. Nordics can be smart but they didn't invent civilization. And hair colors aee distrubuted everywhere.

Attached: 30F24F8E-9105-41FE-9D04-80F43AE27F6B.jpg (1024x576, 55.98K)

The Indus Valley Civilization indicates. That before the Aryans came. They were capable of advanced civilization.

I think a good parallel is when the Manchu's conquered China.

I do suspect that they wanted to maintain their identity like the Manchu's did by forbidding intermarriage to a certain degree.

And then they got rid of that over time.

This is Jacques deMolay. Does this picture reminds you something?

Attached: Jacques de Molay.jpg (640x1000, 223.59K)