Can an Asia country build a NatSoc system?
yep
They would have the easiest time of anyone being that they are the most racially homogeneous countries left on Earth. Some people say China is the closest thing to a national socialist country in existence right now and not actually communist
NatSoc isn't exclusive to germans, so yes
I don't know about the situation within Asia regarding view on that system, but if you aren't constantly being bombarded with propaganda and laws preventing you from doing it, your side of the world can pull it off. The main hurdle I'd imagine is probably the China and Russia might not like a possible contendor for the continent if it becomes too successful
Yes, see People's Republic of China
>ethno-state (no, you cannot "become" Chinese)
>Nationalist
>mercantile economic structure
>militaristic
>expansionist
>one party state
>dissent is violently crushed
>persecution of minorities
>the state above the individual and religion
>no freedom of speech
I heard at least until the year 2000 Japanese school books were teaching that Hitler was the good guy or whatever
We teach him neutrally here, sure holocaust is bad, but we also look at the german perspective of what happens when a nation losses all hope in Weimar republic. Fucking international jew organization started screeching at us a few years back, how dare we not demonize the germans.
Here in America we only learn cartoon tier bullshit about World War II.
They literally teach us here that nobody knows why World War II started. It's a mystery.
>They literally teach us here that nobody knows why World War II started. It's a mystery
Seriously? You mean they don't show you how the massive reparations from ww1 which were demanded to be instantly paid didn't contribute to things going where they went? There are photos of Weimar himself hauling a cart full of german marks which would be worth no more than 100eu in todays terms.
what do you think about NatSoc Vietnam ?
>Weimar himself
meant Hindenburg, bit of a retard moment there
In Canada, it's
>treaty of versailles
>anger
>inflation
>national humiliation
>more anger
>Lead people to turn to Hitler whose rhetoric echoed the way many Germans felt
They leave out the parts of how progressive Weimar was becoming
many of the things I said about China could also be said about Viet Nam
for natsoc to be pulled off, you need to be able to sustain your nation without outside help imo
so if your homeland has a lot of natural resources, it could go legit, but again, the question would be if you wouldn't get involved in conflicts with russia and china, as they still have communism era bias and natsoc is strictly against communism, atleast if we're going by the only attempt in history
same things taught here, though I don't know whether to believe the Any Forums reposts about
>progressive Weimar
it's the internet and shockingly not everything you read is true, if anyone would drop some actual credible links to documentaries or sources, that would help see the bigger picture. Though, "muh alt-right 1488bigtruthniggertonguemyanus video" on bitchute doesn't exactly seem legit
what do you think about flag design in op post ?
I would recommend to use something else instead of the swastika. I don't know about Vietnamese so I might be wrong, but you should use a some other national symbol which represents your people. The swastika was used by the germans as a symbol of their people, though much of the worlds people use the same symbol. Another reason to not use the swastika and some other national symbol instead is to show the people that you are there for them, your history, your culture, your ethnicity and not to just larp/copycat from another country from almost 80 years ago.
Why not?
>Hitler’s motivating force was an unusual synthesis, (never before or since attempted), of the best features of Socialism and of Free Enterprise as opposed to multi-national corporations, (then called monopoly or state capitalism) on the one side, and Nationalism (based on ethnic origin and adherence) versus universalism or internationalism on the other. Hitler’s synthesis worked and it was eminently successful all over Europe, providing full employment, financial stability (zero inflation) and introducing the greatest worker-benefit programmes of any modern, industrial state.
>It was never defeated as an idea but only destroyed (by military power), as a system.
>An idea can only be superseded or defeated by another, better idea. Germany was only defeated militarily in 1945 but the idea of National Socialism is still as strong as ever and is flourishing around the world, but by necessity, underground.
op post symbol is buddhism swastika, have been in used across Asia for hundreds of years as symbol of good luck and prosperity
>byzantine star crescent x swastika
was this ever a thing?
Yes
no
NS is anti Marxist you dumb faggot
I see
alright, then it seems good
>mercantile economic structure
More like corporatism mercantilism but whatever
>expansionist
Not really
>one party state
There is like a dozen party in the Chinese political system, they are subordinated to the CCP though
>dissent is violently crushed
Not really no
>persecution of minorities
Nope
>the state above the individual and religion
It's actually the party first, the state is just an extension of the party
Probably not. Maybe replace the star on the Garuda with the swastika? I don't think thee Pancasila would need change too much in order to adhere to Nationalist Socialist ways.