Mutts explain

Why is he not protected under freedom of speech?

Attached: ap22216570430921-2dceca1166ed5d3a06b0c717f3a7da7c80c6c9c9.jpg (3925x2944, 3.36M)

Jews

freedom of speech is not for right-wingers.

covid killed freedom of speech

GULAGED

Because defamation is a crime and isn’t protected. It’s been that way since the constitution was signed

>Because defamation is a crime and isn’t protected.
eat shit you nigger
any time CNN or WaPo reports on a private individual, they transubstantiate into "public" individuals so their privacy is ignored. When Alex Jones questions a "private" individual who is actually public and uses their public fame to promote gun restriction, suddenly Alex Jones is liable for "defamation"

Attached: 1652957006101.webm (480x600, 1.87M)

Freedom of speech? In America? You've got the wrong country.

So what exactly was the defamation based on? How did it hurt anyone calling out the obvious crisis actors, and why were they not forced to provide proof of these children who died?

Explain nick sandmann

i dont know

Slander was never protected by free speech which is what he committed against the Sandy Hook parents.

slandered private citizens
said they were crisis actors when thier kids were murdered, not joneses smarted move

he was underage

Free speech ends where it costs me money

>Muh crisis actors
Eat shit faggot, your parents wont miss you when a stray bullet passed through your skull

Fpbp

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. He slandered and defamed TWENTY families who had their SIX YEAR OLD CHILDREN murdered. This guy deserves to rot in a Russian Gulag for the rest of his days.

He embarrassed the glowies

cuz he dont look like dis

Attached: R.jpeg-10.jpg (1280x960, 196.71K)

Nah, Robbie Parker and his wife are definitely play acting.

corruption. there's more to be gained for his destruction, even though he's innocent.

He makes $800k a day off defaming victims of a mass shooting, pretty appalling person. Freedom of speech just means the government can't censor you, private citizens can still sue the shit out of you

>Explain nick sandmann
>he was underage
and he lost

Who was defamed and why aren't they sueing him?

haha your seethe is delicious you little rat

the only crisis actor is that faggot in the cage at cpac

Sandy hook was s false flag

Attached: 1559904086913.jpg (732x412, 73.03K)

Bullshit alert!

Attached: A5B77FA2-41B8-49A6-9D50-7A0E866E3490.gif (320x180, 1.53M)

Freedom of what? What the fuck are you on about?

Freedom of speech only protects you from the government not from citizens suing you. If anything there's freedom of the press but then again they proved he lied and his lies harmed the victims, kinda like how the Covington kids sued CNN and won because the lies affected their lives.

People react to extreme grief in unexpected ways, be less of a faggot

Holy shit, I forgot about this illiterate sheboon.
Democrats learned alot about putting 40 IQ negresses on the stand that day.
Amazin

i dont think he lost, it was settled with an NDA i think

defamation

>He slandered and defamed
Slander and defamation are purposeful and malicious. That has to be proven.

Is this the state or class action?

>convince a famous Left-Leaning guy to watch JRE Alex Jones 1
>"maybe you're right about Alex Jones, user"
>Infowars proceeds to promote trannies
T-thanks Alex

He is but lower courts tend to be shit shows that do whatever they want until they get overruled on appeal.

This I can't explain. But there's still not enough proof to claim anything definitively.

Nah there's no excuse for laughing like that and then "getting into character" for the cameras.
It would be but he didn't show up for that part of the trial.

>meme flag kike
>something something grief hand wave
Post discarded

Attached: 6C430966-A3BD-42AD-8AB2-33F2348A5BCD.jpg (960x725, 135.47K)

Freedom of speech ends where a retard's fee fees begin, apparently.

Our country is dead

Attached: 90EF3C78-6822-4EE0-A3FF-B1B8663ACF59.jpg (1009x1004, 100.63K)

It's a common trope that people laugh at funerals because they're so overwhelmed with grief, anyone who disagrees is probably underage

>Alex complains about chemicals turning the frogs gays
>supports trannies anyway
>has tranny porn on his phone

Why anyone defends him is beyond me.

Why aren't you?

The courts were convinced that he was leading groups of people to go after the sandy hook victim's parents.

if it were a crime it wouldn't have been in a civil court.

he wasn't at a funeral he was at a televised press conference talking about the death of his daughter, showing no signs of stress until when he thinks the cameras are rolling. You have to admit it's very suspicious, but again there's no proof of anything.

>He makes $800k a day off defaming victims of a mass shooting
no, he doesn't.

he went off one shooting and even retracted his stance before the courts got involved. he's a human with free speech. you're over dramatic cry for the law to get involved though, its retarded people like you that put witches on the stake through hyperbolic drama.

Here try the longer version, faggot

Attached: 0D3FDE7E-4FFB-4E9B-A6B8-9E166282D099.gif (203x203, 3.07M)

The jury was given his bank statements. He was making over $800k a day during Sandy Hook off dick pills and fake brain powders and make a $50m withdrawal after it was over. He made obscene amounts of money defaming the victims families.

Why is the government telling me when, where, and in what manner I may bear arms?

>be less of a faggot
pot kettle black

Obviously he wasn't at a funeral, I'm saying its common for people to laugh at funerals out of grief, not that he was literally at a funeral. He just lost his child in the most violent way possible, who knows how you would react under those circumstances