Why shouldn't there be a world government

Why shouldn't there be a world government

Attached: bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg (750x1000, 124.2K)

because it will be run by faggots

There will be. It’s more a matter of how and not why.

I am willing to accept a world government
if all jews, spics, chinks (nips can stay), niggers, and gypsies are killed.

Also women are not allowed to participate in any way shape or form.

a government for everyone is a government for no one

For example a Christian word government wouldn’t work because the majority of the world is not Christian and would result in a world war that would end the new world government. This would in turn make it pointless. Hence, the how being more important then why.

>all jews, spics, chinks (nips can stay), niggers, and gypsies are killed.
>Also women are not allowed to participate in any way shape or form.
Dumb incel. Are you afraid that "your" women will go for non-white men? Do you blame da jooooozzzz for your permavirgin status?

Attached: incel.gif (570x537, 73.14K)

Because it's not going to happen. You won't get sovereign nations to give up their militaries, and for good reason, you dumb faggot.

Republic Confederacy with inviolate self defense, speech, association, and private property rights is the only legitimate form of government. Fuck off.

Because I was unironically chosen by God to fight them, and so were many on this board. Some of us were legit allowed to incarnate in this time and place as human beings and given experiences that would arm us against you. We were made precociously aware of you and born with immense magical and spiritual potential just for the purpose of being here, now, to fuck with you. We chose from beyond time and space to accept the mission.
Basically eat my ass loser

Any instance when a religious ethnographic theocracy was established it was doomed to fall by decadence and apostasy. The New Testament was revolutionary in that it showed that the state cannot sustain a moral order for the people, but that the individual can have a moral order within themselves.

Catholic cucks cannot comprehend this.

Because groups with ancient histories should have their own land to prosper and develop independently

>ideological politics arguments

WRONG. The answer is because the tyranny would be unchallengeable, inescapable, unchecked, and absolute. Fucking morons.

>political
No. Spiritual. Something from beyond time.

>Why shouldn't there be a world government
okey but im the kang

I am willing to accept a few thousand years of that if it means no more niggers, spics, chinks, jews or gypsies.

Its a fair trade.

I had to get a post in that made me chuckle,
It needed to make me chuckle
no need to spaz out mass replying like a idiot over it.

There should be and there will be we just need to get rid of some nuisance nations like Russia.
Canada proves a liberal democratic society can effectively govern over all people.

Typical American retardation. You will never do anything against the so called tyranny of government. You will post on Any Forums and do nothing. A world government doesn’t make tyranny more powerful, technology does that. And technology is growing anyway.

blah blah blah
>it's all about fighting
NO, confederated republics provide varied living styles for different people, taylored to the geography, weather, agriculture, and traditions of the region.
>buh muh fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
you're the one living in delusion.

and the confederation itself prevents tyranny by providing an escape route for the disenfranchised, as well as outside (more objective and fair) courts

you have swallowed Any Forums too hard. i bet you sperg
>it's da joooooz
to every post instead of something interesting, unique, and... useful.

>you won't do shit
You've become a parody of yourself.

The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where "feed" and "seed" both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Feeduck and Seeduck".