'Social Contagion' Isn't Causing Adolescents to Become Trans, Study Finds

got any fresh cope to cook up, Any Forums ?

Attached: Untitled.jpg (3357x3417, 1.84M)

Other urls found in this thread:

nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-health-and-wellness/social-contagion-isnt-causing-youths-transgender-study-finds-rcna41392
publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/doi/10.1542/peds.2022-056567/188709/Sex-Assigned-at-Birth-Ratio-Among-Transgender-and?autologincheck=redirected
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes, this sage

>We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing.

fuck your demoralisation thread. im /comfy/ out here

Attached: frog dance.webm (480x480, 2.03M)

'Social contagion' doesn't cause a 3 year old boy to say he's a girl. A white mother does.
The point of puberty blockers is to prevent a male from getting a sexuality,
to become a eunuch with no rape tools with which he can hurt women.
Whites are a disgusting race that can't go extinct soon enough.

Attached: 30532312-0-image-a-32_1594215333957.jpg (1908x1146, 343.5K)

Wrong

Attached: 33FA4AD8-AB49-4C86-8280-3292DC663901.jpg (2048x1463, 1.27M)

*blocks your path*

Attached: fart_bomb-1.jpg (300x300, 26.05K)

Okay Groomer

the study is correct, it's the fluoride that's causing it

More socially acceptable in the recent years

>tranny culture suddenly explodes in last few years after almost never existing in the history of humanity
>only in America
>only in certain parts of America
>primarily in certain(vulnerable) age group

>not a social disease

>A study finds that the common sense conclusion is wrong!
The same shit every time. Make up a new tactic for Christ's sake. Trust in "science" especially these study pushing libtard unis has never been lower.

Lies

The (((EXPERTS))) are at it again boys.

Still no response to this. You’re fucking BTFO, aren’t you, OP?

Attached: 254B19C0-5512-4A79-918E-7A0E0DA9CEFA.jpg (618x1432, 196.28K)

It's absence of identity and personality. They have no real identities, so they make their sexuality their persona. What scum. Honestly.

lol the entire article is bullshit

nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-health-and-wellness/social-contagion-isnt-causing-youths-transgender-study-finds-rcna41392

the person giving this declaration is "director of the National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center ", aka conflict of interest

and the study only applies to female-to-male trannies, which are a very small minority

I just did a study that not only confirms that social contagion IS causing adolescents to become trans, but also that OP is a fag.

>female-to-male trannies, which are a very small minority
I thought the stats said it was 50-50?

Attached: 1654149721577.jpg (1005x593, 86.22K)

>a study found
Well that settles it pack in lads, turns out people aren't products of their environment...traits must all be genetic then...wait a sec...

Attached: 1652561795853.png (440x487, 215.28K)

study of your wife's son?

>Study finds

famous last words

Attached: 1606975400876.png (448x406, 117.98K)

YWNBAW

the conclusions also make no sense

social contagions are not exponential, slight decreases can be expected after times of extreme growth

And why do you need to get rid of straight couples on tv?

publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/doi/10.1542/peds.2022-056567/188709/Sex-Assigned-at-Birth-Ratio-Among-Transgender-and?autologincheck=redirected
>conclusion based entirely on a comparison of the % of trans respondents to a CDC survey taken in 2017 and 2019
They even acknowledge research that's found the exact opposite pattern in their Intro, and cite examples
>Ashley (2019), Journal of Sexual Medicine 16(6)
>De Castro, Solerdelcoll, Plana, et al (2022), Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental). And there's plenty of others which I'm aware of that the researchers didn't cite, such as
>de Vries & Annelou (2022) Pediatrics, 146(4)
>Hutchinson, Midgen & Spiliadis (2020) Archives of Sexual Behaviour 49(1)
>Giovanardi, Fortunato, Mirabella, Speranza & Lingiardi (2020), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(24)
And, obviously, the original study bywhich proposed ROGD in the first place
>Littman (2018), PLOS One 13 (8)
And its review
>Littman (2019), PLOS One 14 (3)
Basically, there's a litany of published work out there that's completely at odds with their findings.

Sorry but after the COVID fiasco I don’t “trust the science” anymore