Believe in freedom to own guns

That’s a dude cause OP is a literal 1pbtid faggot

You can't have the right to someone else's labor retard. You only have the right to BEAR arms, not get them for fucking free.

You end up paying far far more than any other country.

die retard

I used to fuck a chick that looks just like this freckles and all.

>Please explain.
No

Name one famous research hospital not located in America. You get urgent care level healthcare in Australia.

It posts this almost every day and refuses to acknowledge the simple and plainly obvious truth about it's bullshit. Don't bother.

Attached: IT'S NOT FREE ASSHOLE and your not paying for my guns.jpg (237x179, 26.43K)

Low quality bait

Do you pay for other people's guns?

>girl

negative right vs positive right
>you're allowed to own guns
versus
>you must pay for inflated healthcare costs and/or conscript healthcare workers even if no party consents

Universal healthcare is a shitty idea anyway, Canada's healthcare is shit, the UK's healthcare is shit. You're better off making the current systems slightly better than going full Stalin/Mao on the issue

>Big brain OP mocking liberals and Any Forums alike.

still not getting the vax

Not the same. Freedom of gun ownership does not mean free guns. Someone has to invest in the materials to make those guns. They then sell those guns for a profit to a buyer. Healthcare is the same thing. Somebody has to make an investment to provide it. They then sell medical devices and services for a profit. You are free to participate in both of those paid transactions.

Italy has universal healthcare.
The result is that basically the whole healthcare system is crap.

For example today, to have a mammography you need to wait for 2 years, ecography, tac, diabete exam 1 year. For oncological surgery 6 fucking months. I'm not kidding.

This is the result of having no competition. That's why communism is the worst fucking shit in the world. Now basically to access good healthcare an italian need to go to a private clinic and will pay more money after he already paid taxes.

>negative right vs positive right

Attached: 1583632795507.png (600x800, 12.2K)

One is a thing you can own, the other would be forcing someone to offer you a service for free.

If you don't understand the difference you are, by literal definition, a retard.

Have you read the Constitution? It mentions one of those things and not the other. As usual, reading the Constitution will explain everything and clear up your liberal ignorance.

state enforced Healthcare isn't a freedom. legislating medical workings to make them serve you is enslavement

You explain. How are they not mutually exclusive? What do they have to do with one another? No one is demanding universal guns for everyone to be paid for by a substantial tax increase. People want to be able to spend their own money on bearable arms.

you're on the politics board, soijack
what they fuck do you want me to describe it as? legal obligations and legally protected freedoms?

It's also not your problem.

oh

A gun is a tool and property you can use to defend yourself or have fun watching watermelons explode.

Healthcare involves tons of other people's time, resource and money. It's an entire service and product, which one can't have a right too... One can't tell them to operate on you or give you medicine or treat you for absolutely nothing when they too must pay for all their stuff...

Treating healthcare not as a business makes it more expensive. When we were more free market based with health care, the doctors made house calls. Since healthcare was controlled by the government through universities and such, prices skyrocket and services decrease.

God damn I’ve seen this thread and same pic word for word so many times.

>i have a right to someone's labor
ummm I thought that was bad

Go read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

Attached: 00uxqBk4Tf6o.jpg (1080x877, 78.32K)

You have to be at least 18 to post here.

Attached: 1658724736611789.png (600x647, 339.37K)

That's a man

>doesn't recognize one of the most posted trannies on Any Forums
take your own advice

The look on his face gets me every time

But Israel, Africa, do nothing politicians and corporations are?

i want her to shit down my mouth. use my mouth as a toilet. let the poop flow out like niagara falls

Attached: 0af9bc446585064eac20f325587b2617fd9481c1.jpg (1440x2515, 566.11K)

I believe in freedom to raping your throat until it bleeds, but alas.

You have the freedom to buy as much healthcare as you want, same as you are free to buy as many guns as you want. It's not that complicated.

No, it's yours, and the whole world is laughing at your short sightedness.

Government intervention is to blame for the absurdly high medical costs in the USdkhk02

oh and me owning a gun isn't asking my next door neighbor to pay for my gun. universal healthcare is just a burden on society by making someone else pay for your own insurance.

and its just a trojan horse for communism.
chapter 2 of the communist manifesto:
>Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
>These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
>1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
>2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
>3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
>4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
>5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
>6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
>7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State;
>8. Equal liability of all to work.
>9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries
>10. Free social education for all children in public schools. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.

Attached: 1ac2f7385d26d12f24f9def5abe3ef7adf4c7a56.jpg (1440x2543, 679.84K)

>freedom to universal healthcare
I believe in your freedom to universal healthcare. Now you have to go out into the free market and get investors to sponsor you idea. You just need to convince them to give you free money. Let me know how it goes, I'm in....

Universal healthcare is not in the constitution.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Healthcare is universal, as are guns.
Anyone can go out and BUY healthcare.
If you are talking about public healthcare, then we need to talk about public guns and handing them out for free.

>You must, therefore, confess that by “individual” you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.
>Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
>On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
>The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
>Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
>But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
and of course, abolish families and parents. hand the children over to the state and be raised in "social education" by the state.

anything "universal" "state provided" is just a trojan horse to usher in communism. "social democrats" are just democratic socialist. aka, hurrr we will use democracy to vote for dear leader to fuck us in the ass.
that and marx said to use democracy to reign in communism as well:
>We have seen above, that the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy.

Attached: 2a67f6627af5335a43ecd3200bd68767541d93ea.jpg (1145x921, 226.81K)