For those unfamiliar, Jon and Robert lured James away from his Mother and took him on a two mile walk to his death. We know they tried to abduct another child that day and failed.
What's more chilling is the courts weren't told they tried this a month before on another child.
Anyway, after they had James (Jon lured him on Robert's orders) they took him out of the Strand Mall on the aformentioned 2 mile journey.
The official narrative is correct up until they reached the embankment near the rail where the killed him.
The actual evidence differs greatley.
Upon reaching the embankment they DID NOT start a frenzied beating as told about.
It was a bizzare sexual assualt. After blue paint was used to blind James he was stripped from the waist down, batteries were stuffed in his mouth and did indeed enter the anal tract.
The most disturbing detail, as never told, is they attempted to tie his penis in a knot. Causing huge tissue damage.
This is why his foreskin was retracted.
A thin rusty iron bar was used to sodomise him. And paint was put into his urethra.
What differs next is the order. There is a possibilty he was alive when the train struck him.
After the sexual assualt, James attempted to get up, Robert told him to stay down and threw a brick at him. Official records suggest this is when the both batterd James.
However they may have only hit him once or twice before dragging him onto the track and PINNING him down, not KILLING him, with the fishplate. James' legs were badly beaten too. This was NOT mentioned in the court.
They may have broken his legs to further stop him getting up and escaping the train.
It's a possiblity they actually whitnessed James get severed in two by the train before then beating the dying child over the head with bricks and stones, in panic of the noise caused by him after being severed.