I need examples of media manipulation, specifically examples of appeal to authority fallacy, where an article cites an "expert" or "study" without providing the expert's identity or the study's source. Can some anons jump in with examples?
Need Examples of Media Bullshit
Other urls found in this thread:
thoughtco.com
twitter.com
>cdc says, so therefore
>fact checkers say
>feds say
Etc
Are you looking for links, or just cases? You'll find literally hundreds of examples of these via "experts say", "sources familiar with Donald Trump's thinking", World Health Organization appeals, etc. It's extremely common in modern (((journalism))).
Any specific examples like screencaps and shit?
Unfortunately, a lot of the examples I found actually DO provide a study or name of an expert, but most of the time it's just stupid correlations which SUGGEST a trend (eg. more people die of heart attacks during winter months means climate change causes heart attack). That doesn't count as appeal to authority though, it's a different kind of fallacy.
i'm looking for specific links, yes
preferably those which actually fit the definition of appeal to authority, meaning they just cite an "expert" but don't actually give you any empirical evidence.
If you're looking at empirical or non empirical data and using that as a reference to support your argument, then that's not appeal to authority.
Appeal to authority would be "the CDC says the vaccine is safe, so it is." If i were to say "this study correlates heart failure to the vaccine, so they may be linked", then that's not an appeal to authority. It's my subjective interpretation of a data table.
Sorry, I should specify that i'm looking for appeal to authority fallacy in particular
other examples are welcome of course, but i'm making this resource package as part of a project and I want to redpill my audience as much as possible.
yeah exactly that's what I mean
a lot of the examples I found weren't even appeal to authority they were just misusing statistics
i need actual examples of appeal to authority by the media like "study suggests winter vagina causes blood clots" but they don't show the study being referred to
Stupid fucking bitch. Those headlines aren't mutually exclusive. Bad propaganda. No shekels for you this week.
Anyone who suggests something is true because X or Y says so. It's fallacious because you're having someone make your argument for you.
that's not even a real article i can't find any archive link to it
The entire inconvenient truth made by al gore is a giant appeal to authority fallacy proven incorrect
i know what appeal to authority is, i just can't find any examples of it in media
my definition of appeal to authority has 2 key traits
>1. the authority mentioned is vague and unspecified (eg. experts suggest, source close to x claims)
>2. no actual empirical evidence is provided (so if an article fulfils criteria #1 but actually provides a valid source or name of authority it is not considered appeal to authority)
a lot of articles fit #1 but not #2, even if the "evidence" provided is just cherry picking stats
Experts say "Who cares? Just go with it."
I don't have any specific examples, but i'm sure you can find some.
i tried searching 4plebs archives but everything is just examples of doublethink (which i already have plenty of examples of)
mainly i tried searching keywords like "climate change heart attacks" (you know, since the jews keep shilling that) and I did find a few examples but all of them actually did have a bunch of bogus studies behind them