MRNA Immune Deficiency Explained

I think this has been said before but I don't think anyone was saying it as early or as loudly as I was... Given that a state of emergency has been declared, I thought I would take a moment to once again reiterate something which seems obvious to me but may not be entirely obvious to all of you.

It looks like we are going to lose a high percentage of those who received any mRNA injection and that this could have been foreseen as a natural consequence of injecting large quantities of protein snippets that should only ever be introduced to the human body in small quantities. The intention of Pfizer and Moderna was to combine their access to genetic data sold to them by Ancestry and 23andMe with clinical adverse reaction data to build a genetic map of what mRNA triggers will activate or suppress what gene, something very useful for tailoring gene therapies of all sorts. This is why they wanted the contact information and even license plate numbers of people getting those shots, but J&J/AstraZeneca was given out anonymously in churches and the like. Autoimmune therapies are highly profitable, as is selling a "vaccine" for $60 per dose.

There was a smear campaign by both Pfizer and Moderna against J&J/AstraZeneca to try to convince people that just because their vaccines had a lower per dose price (ONLY $28) that it was somehow dangerous. We are now seeing strong indications that the worst fears about the experimental injections not even being vaccines in any clinical sense of the term were well-founded. We are living in something like the Tuskegee Experiments except scaled up to the tune of 1 Billion participants.

Millions are already gone due to induced autoimmune disorders, many of which consisted of myocarditis resulting in sudden death. The next phase will be far worse.

Attached: Madeleine Swann.jpg (350x358, 21.96K)

Monkeypox and Polio are on the rise for a simple reason: Contagions that are difficult to transmit or which people were already immunized against can thrive when people are immunocompromised. In this case, however, T-cell counts do not tell the whole story, which is why they are able to plausibly deny this is going on.

The notion that monkeypox is somehow a "gay disease" is frankly a cheap shot and shockingly bigoted coming from a Democratic White House. 40% of cases, it turns out, affect women, which in and of itself debunks the propaganda being put out. Some sources say that out of 7000 U.S. cases of Monkeypox, 72 are dead. Government sources say it's only 3 people. There is an extremely wide gulf between the reality of the fatality rate and what the White House is saying, which commands scrutiny.

The countries with the highest rate of Monkeypox infection are the same countries that ordered the most mRNA injections. Countries like India that used traditional virus-based vaccines have virtually no reported cases of Monkeypox.

There are specific scientific reasons why it was inevitable that anyone receiving one of these injections would develop a slowly-progressing acquired immune deficiency.

These mRNA snippets are ordinarily found in tiny quantities in virus particles. Knowing the mRNA pattern of one part of one spike protein is far from sufficient for an immune cell to know how to neutralize a particular viral cell. Spikes have multiple protein types, there are multiple spikes, and their physical dimensions and configuration relative to one another is crucial to building antibodies effective against any virus.

The "miracle" of T-cells is that when any viral particle attempts to assimilate the T-cell, the T-cell keeps careful track of the spike proteins by which it is probed. Should the T-cell survive the encounter, it can report back to B-cells, which, in turn, inform bone marrow's leukocyte progenitors as to how to build more immune cells capable of countering that particular virus.

In the early 20th century, a theory of memory (of the neurological sort) was put forth but ultimately debunked that suggested that the reason that people forget things is because new memories "push the old ones out." While this is certainly not true for neural memories, when it comes to the immune system, there is some truth to the notion that old memories can be pushed out by new ones.

Under ordinary conditions, a person would never encounter enough disease (and survive) to need to be worried about their bone marrow being essentially overwritten. In the bone marrow's system, there is no way for the immune system to know which "virus definitions" are most relevant or which clusters of space in its proverbial hard drive are in use. Generally speaking, there is plenty of free space, so the cytogenic cells that are reprogrammed are chosen at random and occasionally, some that have already received programming are overwritten.

When a viral infection occurs, the immune system is accustomed to only being able to successfully evaluate a handful of viral particles and that information has to be reported back to the cytogenic cells. To be useful, B-cells have to "beef up" the information gathered by T-cells upon arriving back at the cytogenic cells of the bone marrow. If a mechanism for doing this did not exist, a robust immune response would not be possible.

>sees a tranny in a wig
>"he lookie like a man"
based ms. swan

In nature, T-cells are not supposed to have such easy access to these mRNA fragments. In the case of these Pfizer/Moderna injections, when a fragment of mRNA (given that it is not living and thus it cannot intelligently seek out living cells to infect and thus huge quantities are required to generate chance collisions with T-cells) the T-cell, believing it has successfully completed a viral analysis, reports back what it's learned. The trouble is, what it's learned is just a single fragment, well below the complexity of any virus. Not only would the immune system need to know of all of the proteins (not just a single protein) but it would need to know what the dynamics of those spikes are sc. the sequence in which they attempt to attach to a T-cell.

Given that part of the role of a B-cell is to relay and repeatedly duplicate information concerning recent infections to the cytogenic cells of the bone marrow, it begs the question, what would happen if those cytogenic cells were reprogrammed with supposed virus descriptions that are so terse as those associated with a mere single protein as in the Pfizer/Modera concoctions? To make copies of information, a B-cell must use chemical/protein precursors and will make those copies to the point of exhaustion, meaning that under normal circumstances, a single B-cell can help to reprogram several or perhaps dozens of individual cytogenic cells, thus tasking them with making specialized leukocytes able to neutralize a particular virus effectively. Thus, the part of the bone marrow responsible for making white blood cells is essentially a mosaic, with different progenitor cells making genetically unique leukocytes and those differently-tasked cells might be imagined as a bunch of multi-colored dots, if they were to be diagramed according to the diseases that each offers a level of protection against.

Genetic information can be described in terms of the amount of information it contains in "bytes" and it can also be described in terms of how much chemical energy it takes to copy the information, and these figures will generally correlate. B-cells, remember, are accustomed to making several copies (using pent up chemical energy) of complete virus definitions. One mRNA fragment is not a complete virus definition and, in fact, takes up a fraction of the space as a "whole" definition. Thus, when the B-cell dumps its data and all of its copies, the cell can make hundreds of copies of this incomplete data instead of several.

The problem does not end there. The mRNA fragments are injected in such massive quantities that the likelihood of T-cells encountering them is exponentially higher than under normal conditions. Thus, there are many more overwrites occurring in the bone marrow than would otherwise be happening for that reason as well.

Now, take the case of someone whose immune system is compromised by this process. In their case, nearly all of the progenitor cells of their bone marrow are reprogrammed to make T-cells that not only don't know how to resist previously encountered virii, but they cannot even fight the coronavirus. A single fragment could never be enough information to help to fight any virus. The only reason any injected person can defeat corona at all is because it takes years for the reprogramming to cascade since mRNA fragments continue to persist in the bloodsteam indefinitely (these are the same sorts of proteins that can be cleansed through plasmapheresis to slow aging.)

Once an individual's new T-cells only "know" one spike protein, the T-cells, although they appear physically the same from the outside, begin to behave very differently. The most critical aspect of T-cell behavior is the way in which it allows a virus to partially penetrate its membrane with one spike at a time, measures the proteins by copying them, and hopefully defeats the virus so it can report the collected data back to the progenitor cells through its B-cell intermediaries. A T-cell that is functioning properly will wait for an attack gambit to play out before attempting to trigger apoptosis in the viral cell.

If a T-cell is reprogrammed to think that any single spike constitutes a complete attack gambit, the T-cell will stand down its defenses in order to attempt an apoptosis-inducing attack. If this occurs, then the T-cell automatically loses the fight since the momentum in the battle is with the virus and the T-cell is essentially not equipped to even begin to fight effectively. Whereas AIDS occurs when T-cell counts drop as a result of progenitor cells being physically replaced with HIV virus cells, this mRNA-induced immune deficiency is more akin to sickle-cell anemia, where the red cell count is not at issue, but rather, the oxygen-carrying capacity of the cells.

Hopefully this will help you to understand what is really going on. It is unlikely that our controlled media will be permitted to report on the truth of any of this. The fact that the people now suffering from polio were vaccinated as children as we all were should tell you something. People who received mRNA are losing immunity to diseases to which they had previously been immune.

There are obvious parallels between this and experiments done involving deliberately exposing children to large quantities of X-Rays in the 1950s. When they all got sick and died, the people organizing the studies disavowed any responsibility and were never held accountable.

This situation has the potential to end life as we know it since the loss large segments of the workforce would lead to a basic breakdown of the entire system. This means that the people who didn't get the injections may ultimately starve to death as a result of the loss of much of the populi due to the aforementioned immune deficiency.

It may still be possible for those who received mRNA to be saved if they undergo extensive plasmapheresis to eliminate the protein fragments as thoroughly as possible. Since this would be prohibitively expensive, the machines don't exist in sufficient numbers, and this issue isn't being acknowledged by our government, it seems unlikely that this process could be successfully reversed.

What there is time to do is to hold these drug companies responsible for what amounts to genocide. How we accomplish that, I leave up to you.

>40% of cases, it turns out, affect women

Affect is a washy word it could mean they are sick or have had their lives affected by it e.g: a male relative or roommate has it. Either way, it requires a source.

> Some sources say that out of 7000 U.S. cases of Monkeypox, 72 are dead.

What sources?

>Countries like India that used traditional virus-based vaccines have virtually no reported cases of Monkeypox.

India has been reporting its own unrelated strain of monkeypox emerging.

Please refine this, or I'm gonna have to call schizo or shill on you.

i think you are right