Why are journalists so clueless about firearms?
Why are journalists so clueless about firearms?
Other urls found in this thread:
they aren't, they just don't want regular citizens owning them because it makes them harder to suppress.
youtube.com
>It felt to me like a bazooka — and sounded like a cannon.
>But mostly, I was just terrified.
>Squeeze lightly on the trigger and the resulting explosion of firepower is humbling and deafening (even with ear protection).
>The recoil bruised my shoulder, which can happen if you don't know what you're doing. The brass shell casings disoriented me as they flew past my face. The smell of sulfur and destruction made me sick. The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary form of PTSD. For at least an hour after firing the gun just a few times, I was anxious and irritable."
>Gersh Kuntzman
>New York Daily News
LOL who would mount the optic on the hand guard?
what the fuck. what a shitty sight placement and why the fuck are the iron sights up? some boomer bitch just learn about guns?
Someone needs to tell Gersh, Smokeless powder doesn't contain sulfur
front sight is also backwards
That's the coolest Assault Rifle 15 I've ever seen.
Journos have showed themselves to be either:
1 - extremely poorly educated. Typing out articles for a living? There are retards on this board that pump out more WPM than your average journo for free. And most of it reads better too.
2 - willing bad actors or provocateurs that are doing their master's bidding in aiding in the disarming the people.
Its not really that complicated.
nobody is clueless or incompetent when a system wants to hammer something thru, its designed that way. there are 20+ millions working for your system, fed, state, local. if you think that they act out of cluelessness you are clueless. media is the propaganda arm of gov.
Someone who wants to cowhitness thier bends with thier bussy.
Just imagine this ultra-dramatic kike in am actual gun fight now.
(((Journalists))) are first on DOTR
You realize the optic is on the receiver in your picture and the stock is most likely free floating on the forend, right?
LOL I totally missed that one.
He really uses his ring fingers for rings too, what a fag, who gets double married
>You realize the optic is on the receiver in your picture and the stock is most likely free floating on the forend, right?
Lol, that fagott has never even heard of a long eye relief scope. Probably a jurno.
I remember that article, what a soiboi.
>recoil on a .223
Ya it's loud but that's what you wear hearing protection for.
My first gun was in 8mm Mauser. That was a pretty good baseline.
>Why are journalists so clueless
you should have ended your question there
because they're not journalist and journalism is dead
Because FU, that's why.!
>Kuntzman