Taxation is Theft

Taxes are never, at no level of taxation, consistent with individual freedom and property rights. Taxes are theft. The thieves — the state and its agents and allies — try their very best to conceal this fact, of course, but there is simply no way around it. Obviously, taxes are not normal, voluntary payments for goods and services, because you are not allowed to stop such payments if you are not satisfied with the product. You are not punished if you do no longer buy Renault cars or Chanel perfume, but you are thrown into jail if you stop paying for government schools or universities or for Mr. Sarkozy and his pomp. Nor is it possible to construe taxes as normal rent-payments, as they are made by a renter to his landlord. Because the French state is not the landlord of all of France and all Frenchmen. To be the landlord, the French state would have to be able to prove two things: first, that the state, and no one else, owns every inch of France, and second, that it has a rental contract with every single Frenchman concerning the use, and the price for this use, of its property. No state — not the French, not the German, not the US-American or any other state — can prove this. They have no documents to this effect and they cannot present any rental contract. Thus, there is only one conclusion: taxation is theft and robbery by which one segment of the population, the ruling class, enriches itself at the expense of another, the ruled.

Attached: 1650036287976.jpg (235x283, 7.89K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IndA0kPTDPI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You are correct. Enjoy driving on dirt roads

deboonked

Attached: freedom!.png (1265x744, 814.56K)

You hit the nail on the head, and if we never overthrow our kiked governments this situation will never be different.

Attached: 1609131596184.jpg (500x370, 69.74K)

Good point, I have heard about private road ways before. I don't really see any point to regulation besides maybe some legislation for military?

Typical perspective that you probably can not make an argument on

So you think that as soon as regulation ends you’ll stop sucking the boot of huge corporations? Why do you think that?

that's great, what are you going to do about it?

Are you high on foreskins? Only a kike would defend these current governments and their ever increasing taxes.

When the state granted land titles to a fraction of the population, it gave that fraction devices with which to levy, and pocket, tolls on the fruits of the labor of others. Those without land privileges must either buy or rent those privileges from the people who received the grants or from their assignees. Thus the state titles enable large landowners to collect a transfer payment, or "free lunch" from the actual land users.

Many libertarians struggle with the legitimate question of how any governing body achieves rightful jurisdiction in a community, and we join them in opposing collection by such super-statist organizations as the United Nations, which is substantially a federation of tyrannies. However, royal libertarians raise the question selectively and rhetorically in regard to community collection of land rents. They acknowledge that there must be courts to settle, among other things, property disputes. It seems rather obvious that whatever entity has authority to rule on who gets the land also has authority to rule on who gets the land rent.

Attached: moocher.png (600x331, 57.93K)

Cucked German slave of the state loves being mogged by daddy government and it’s big cock

What???

Only a fucking retard would say this dumb shit.

>deflecting
>ad hominems
You think Jews are bad? Wait until corporations are completely unchecked. Why are you defending a bunch of rich guys? A lot of them also happen to be Jewish, you know that right? Why would you defend wealthy Jews?

Well done you've taken the first step to learning the noble lie.
Civilization in all its forms is slavery and dysgenic.

Look up fair use land tax

I’d rather be a slave of a government that’s elected every few years than a slave of billionaires. Why are you shilling so much for wealthy Jews?

To the "muh roads" fucktards:

youtube.com/watch?v=IndA0kPTDPI

Attached: IMG_20220522_223810_008.jpg (1242x1170, 153.8K)

i WILL enjoy the dirt roads and you will eat the bugs thank you

Look up Henry george

Big corporations are able to exist and function in their current capacities, because of government, you know-nothing shit for brains retard. Who bails them out, every single time? Who stifles competition and creates monopolies. GOVERNMENT! You absolute fucking moron.

Attached: 1659784274661165.gif (720x540, 447.84K)

In addition, the government use and rely on PRIVATE CONTRACTORS to build roads. Not corporations, you fucking retard.

Attached: 1659718968694612.png (480x531, 185.13K)

Not only are megacorps propped up by government in the interests of government, but all corporations are themselves legal entities only existable by government, otherwise they would just be businesses without the fictional advantages granted to them by government

Wtf do you think builds roads, retard? PEOPLE! Why do you jackasses think the government is done mystical entity that is the only thing that can get ANYTHING done. The government is made of PEOPLE! PEOPLE get shit done. The problem is retarded people like you who cede responsibility and risk to others.

Attached: 1658460359265896.webm (1920x1080, 202.43K)

I’ll take dirt roads over being a prisoner of a satanic system

Just go live in towns with subscriptions where the town lord will supply basic infrastructure for a small fee.

what's with the recent ancap shilling around here?

Frenchies are such faggot retards who will start a riot just because their boss didn't raise their wage for more than a year.

Liechtenstein

The product is participating in the economy of a state. If you stop doing that, you stop being taxed.

Theft from the peasants to maintain a defensive army and natural monopolies is justified. 5% sales tax should be the only legal kind of tax, meaning those who consoom more pay more. Maybe 5% income tax for anyone earning above the mean income is also justified.

Government should only exist for natural monopolies such as violence and transport infrastructure.

>army
>roads
>railways
Can't think of many more natural monopolies desu.

Why? When do we get to use the guns? Wtf is the purpose of 2A? Why is a tax needed when what comes natural to humans (survival) overrides the force that is inherent to taxation "for your own good".

Government ITSELF is a monopoly. Wtf are you'd talking about. Downright stupidity.

>can't think of any other monopolies.
Fucking dumb asses abound. Zoomers are truly fucking retarded.

Attached: 1659752345739520.gif (350x197, 1.9M)

Are you seriously this dumb? A government is supposed to be essentially the army who holds your people's territory from outside invasions of not-your-people 'just trying to survive'. There are very few public goods that benefit from centralised control but defence of your nation is one of them. Roads are another one.

>anarchists and minarchists ree'ing at each other

Yes, I understand that your brain has been jew'd and brainwashed into regurgitating retarded rhetoric. Government is still a monopoly. No matter how much of burns your stupid ass, it is. Fucking moron

Attached: 1659744921908543.webm (1280x720, 694.85K)

Ofc it's a German, do you even know what percentage of tax revenue is allocated to roads?

That is an oxymoron. 'Government' practically MEANS monopoly. 'Having a monopoly on government' is meaningless unless you specify what aspects of society they are going to govern.