Clean

>be nuclear power plant
>produce a lot of enery
>your country builds 50 of them
>congratulation you have 50 possible dirty bombs

>solution to a fake problem

Anarchist lefties hate civilization, they want to destroy all industry and live in tents. Totalitarian lefties are bought and paid by russians and chinks who want to destroy western countries so they can take control of the globe.

They watched the Simpsons so they think nuclear reactors are green goo factories that spill into the rivers and ponds

This
Take the STEMpill or become homeless

this too unfortunately

>be nuclear power plant
>have the least number of deaths caused per unit of energy of ANY energy type
>put out less radiation than burning coal

YOU CAN'T HUG YOUR CHILDREN WITH NUCLEAR ARMS

They want us to keep using fossil fuels and renewables which are high profit margin since they are either consumed or extremely high maintenance.

This but also hippies.

>Clean
It produces radioactive waste instead of co2, if anything is the dirtiest energy production.
You can't ignore it just because your boss is focusing on other forms of waste.

Nuclear power upsets them because it doesn't enrich black people

>Why does the left hate Nuclear Energy so much?
They are useful idiots, not logical thinkers.

>less radiation
okay go into the red forrest and rub your face with earth.
i ll pay for the travel etc everythin, i want a livestream with you.
rubbing dirt from the red forrest in your face

>Why does the left hate Nuclear Energy so much?
it doesn't kill enough people

The mass of waste is ten million times smaller than the mass of CO2 and coal fly ash of conventional electric production. It is
>literally
fucking nothing.

Radioactive waste disposal is a manufactured issue. The solution is a simple as recycling it but governments don't want that.

forget to mention that i pay 500$ for every liter of water that you drink from the forrest

>It produces radioactive waste instead of co2, if anything is the dirtiest energy production.
>You can't ignore it just because your boss is focusing on other forms of waste.
And like CO2 you can manage the waste. I'd suggest using it in a breeder reactor to convert the other 95% of the potential into energy. Leaving only a tiny fraction of waste that can cool in storage for a few year then be placed into a salt dome for a geological time.

This user gets it.
Liberalism is a mental disorder

Do reactors spew their radioactive chemicals everywhere on normal use, retard?

That would unironically be fine as long as you didn't eat it. The russians that had their organs melt there recently only did so because they were chilling in trenched for over a month. Like some other user said, you're applying the Simpsons understanding of nuclear power like a moron.

Because nuclear energy would solve their bullshit "environmental" problems, when in reality they want to use the environment as an excuse for globalism/great reset/etc drastic reductions in lifestyle.

>>put out less radiation than burning coal
More accurate to state less dose to the public than coal plants. If coal plants were regulated by the NRC, they would all have been shutdown over 10 CFR 20 violations.

>MUH CHERNOBYL dude nuclear is so scary did you watch chernobyl on hbo? so scary bro we should institute carbon credits and put ugly inefficient wind turbines everywhere because im a risk-free faggot who saw a spooky tv show

Attached: 1601257500078.jpg (301x246, 32.73K)

>Why does the left hate Nuclear Energy so much? Its clearly the best source of clean energy
Its almost like that isn't the point

Attached: 1657334159138m.jpg (606x1024, 111.29K)

seestfu
exactly the radiation damage can still be found in soil samples in germany today, and only a cloud has come to us.
are you retarded, go take a bath in the heavy water.

Because Vatniks pay environmental groups to protest it to prop up their petro state.

the show was such a joke, they literally said in the show the plant could blow up in megaton range explosion, absolute fiction

coal plants kill more people every single day than nuclear has killed in total, your country is run by fucking subhumans

Close. Green power generates more "jobs" allowing politicians to get victories in their sphere of influence

Ask literally anyone who has a degree or is studying Physics or Engineering and they will tell you it's way easier to control and European media have been brainwashing most of the population about it.
t. Physics and Math teacher (Austrian STEM high school)

>muh dirty bombs
There have been thousands of oil and gas plants that have exploded and caused widespread damage. On top of their relative safety, the newest generation of nuclear reactors make it virtually impossible for meltdowns and other such accidents to happen.

Those goalposts sound heavy user, need any help?

It's a part of a multi pronged assault against the people. Nuclear works, safety is paramount, waste can easily be disposed off, and the foundational science for it isn't all that hard for the common person to understand.

The productivity of a country is based on the price of its energy, cheap energy allows much things to happen. Expensive energy makes everything else more expensive and labour intensive. We've been given lots of cheap energy and advanced quite a lot, but now that cheap energy is going away. The white race has advanced these technologies to a degree that 3rd world shit skins can implement then, but only after the west has collapsed. That way the Jews can have their mulatto slave races to service them, in perpetuity.

The talmud and the old testament has nothing to do with exploring the heavens, which is the white man's destiny, only ruling over those God create them to rule in this one planet. From limitless cheap energy we can make it more efficient, and hopefully develope FTL. Without cheap abundant energy we have to fight amongst ourselves for it.

A few meme points in the election cycle pale next to destroying the goyim way of life

This isn't 100% accurate but effectively yes. Reprocessing isn't cheap and it is dirty vs using clean fuel.

Damn nigga u dumb AF

Green energy can be both.

>muh hypothetical dirty bomb
Hans, when you are paying €4k/MWh remember that €4k capital could produce 1 MW of electricity for 40+ years in a nuclear power plant. You only have yourself to blame for your problems.
About 10k/year in the US alone.

Based jew understander

>Reprocessing isn't cheap and it is dirty vs using clean fuel.
Yes. Hanford is an example of reprocessing gone wrong.

Because it doesn’t invoke radical social change, their real goal

They hate because it will make energy cheap for us regular folk. They hate anything that makes life easier for us.
PS they hate you

>I dont care about facts!
>I'm a big emotional vagina!
Checks out

Too bad the Holocaust is fake; Hitler should have gassed your ancestors.

no strategical nuclear targets on german soil.
so suck my dick ivan gayovich

>no strategical nuclear targets on german soil.
you do understand strategic target includes things like ports and rail yards

>build nuclear plant
>we dont want to attack it
>just buy our parts
>they are not compromised

Attached: averagerussian.png (1738x914, 1.97M)

My post, , still applies.

ports and rails are not dirty bombs

>just be a slave to petrol and coal companies for eternity goy

Lol pretty delusional there

sure
check german soil data

Attached: angrysad.png (267x296, 147.64K)

ground bursts are much more dirty than a nuclear plant