I've been holding out on the moon landing as being a hoax.
I know from JFK to 9/11, they were CIA/Mossad. I now know that Sandy hook was a hoax due to recent (((court rulings))) for Alex Jones. But the moon landing was faked? Really guys? I mean, sure they filmed parts of it in a studio/desert because they couldn't film that stuff during the flight to the moon and back, but to be totally fake I mean come on guys, really?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
nasa.gov
twitter.com
WE BELIEVE EVEN MORE STRONGLY THAT SANDY HOOK WAS A HOAX NOW THAT THEY'VE DRAGGED ALEX JONES THROUGH SUCH A PUBLIC ATTACK
Would have been more expensive to fake it at the time period. Plus we did it a few more times for good measure. Nobody else has topped us.
Have you ever noticed there are never any stars in photos? It's because the star sky of the moon would have been too hard to generate before computers. They'd have to use a fake star sky which would easily get proven fake by astronomers so they went with dark sky.
>more expensive to fake it.
Uhuh is that why to make space movies they take the actors out into space or?
>stars in the night sky? Why would you expect that? Stop asking stars seen from the moon!
>Technology
Its not the tech its how they built it and the knowledge to make it work.
Everything was hand welded and highly modified. The manufacturing techniques were highly based on human skills. Skills that essentially no longer exist.
We can make it back to the moon no problem, if there was the interest. The main difficulty is escaping earth. The only big difference between going to the ISS and the moon is the amount of fuel and the size of the rocket required(expense).
THIS IS A NASA DATA MINING THREAD.
DUE TO THE PRECEDENT SET BY THE ALEX JONES TRIAL:
THEY WILL GET YOUR IP AND THEY WILL SUE YOU FOR NOT BELIEVING IN THIS EVENT.
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED!
And the radiation which exists outside of a certain distance out of Earth's magnet field
We got good CGI now, but back in the day they didn't have the computer-power. Besides, if anyone would have called bullshit it would have been the Russians and the Chinese and those cunts knew they were humbled something fierce.
It's pretty bright out, so all the stars are gonna be outshined. However, the Moon doesn't have an atmosphere to make the sky blue with Rayleigh scattering, so it's just a black sky
Watch a movie from the 1960s you retard. Faking stuff like dust curling in low g is essentially impossible without cgi.
The soviets did call bullshit but they're in a different infosphere. There was a big please explain on how NASA overcame the radiation from a certain distance outside of Earth's magnetic field, it's why the USSR didn't progress further. None of these astronauts got sick or anything.
>
idk what this thread is about but i just gotta say i fucking HATE niggers so much
wow interdasting
>Its not the tech its how they built it and the knowledge to make it work
that's not what Mr NASA cuck said
We can stop a pretty good chunk of the suns radiation, but you're pretty much doomed to get irradiated by comic rays.
The moon journey isn't long enough to do anything but raise the chance of cancer.
Checked.
I watched an interview of an Astro-not that didn’t even know what the van Allen radiation belt was.
No stars in the sky is flat earth tier misdirection bullshit.
Go watch American Moon.
lol nice try kikebot
What do you think?
that looks sped up. hard to draw any conclusions from something clearly manipulated like that.
God you faggots are insufferable.
yeah well that's not what this thread is about but it is Any Forums so go ahead, speak your mind user
They've answered that. Here's a link to their explanation.
nasa.gov
Why user?
the US put 4.5% of their whole federal budget to nasa in the peak of the 1960's (adjusted for inflation it would be 50 billion dollars), now they put in about 0.5% (which is 20 billion dollars, but note that back in the 1960's the federal budget wasn't as large as today, if we spent 5% of our budget today, it would be 200 billion dollars).
if we gave 50 billion dollars to every person in the US in the 1960's (180 million population), everyone would get $270 (or $27 if your use 1960's dollars).