How do racists reconcile this?

High-tier bait. I'll bite.

>over many thousands of years they adapted to their environments, resulting in the various phenotypes of today's people.
You have literally described evolution. You're admitting we've evolved to be different.

>Human deems are much more similar to each other than different
I think you're trying to inarticulately say that there's more variation within human ethnic groups than between them. This is known as Lewontin's Fallacy. There is more variation within "Asian people" than between Asians and Africans, yes, but this is only true if you look at any one particular gene. The more genes you examine, the less true this becomes. When you compare entire genomes, Asians have far more in common with each other than with Africans.

>so racism is just silly
Hating somebody for something they have no control over is silly. Acknowledging objective biology is the definition of intelligence.

Attached: Geigeresque.jpg (763x1080, 149.97K)

Even if we use your logic does it not follow that as we encountered harsher selective pressures, like regular seasons of freezing, those people would be adapted to intelligence and long term planning than the group that never encountered those pressures?

Attached: 42EC9419-17D7-48A9-8D8B-C32434F0C79F.jpg (572x532, 52.46K)

And then spread out to the rest of the world's continents.

Attached: Putative_migration_waves_out_of_Africa.png (1210x1002, 633.59K)

Newer models make the old one's obsolete.

Homo Erectus, Homo Floresiensis, Homo Habilis, Homo Rudolfensis, Homo Heidelbergensis, Denisova Hominins. Pick an early human.

fuck off, khazar liar.

"OuT oF aFrIcA" just trust the (((science))), goyim

We evolved and niggers didn't. Done.

Attached: main-qimg-a784226f38653af9b9e1849a1ead4a25.jpg (602x900, 181.35K)

Can any user send me a link to the study in pic related?

>equates human = humanity
>"if it is from africa it must be niggers"
>thinks that early humans are just like modern humans
>ignores all homo branches
what kind of small brain is thisp

Genetic anthropology
Dna analysis
Real Science based on data not fairytales

Attached: 37055DE4-7C17-4BE2-B58E-62C9F0330C35.jpg (828x792, 533.87K)

That’s true, niggers are definitely ancient people…

>find deformed retard skeleton in cave
This must be a new form of human evolution!

Pre European diaspora like bwc coming throw.its in the name how fucked they got Bleached.com

jews had sex with apes, baboons and chimpanzees along their early trade routes through africa and spawned niggers. beaners and chinks too, but the monkeys in those areas are a lot smaller, obviously.

>Human deems are much more similar to each other than different, so racism is just silly.

40000 years of isolation in a frigid climate can cause a lot of variation, look how much dogs have changed in just a few hundred years.

So about 5% of sub Saharan Africans are as smart as 50% of Caucasians or something like that

The converse hypothesis, that 40000 years of separation in vastly different environments resulted in no significant IQ differences is way more unlikely

No that’s just what the original theories were based on , the assumption that niggers are just less evolved, but modern genetic testing shows a clear picture of cromagon mating with homo Erectus to make niggers after the European and Asian split not before

because Europeans are cro magnon and niggers are not

Genesis 6-8

Attached: OC-just-now.png (2100x1500, 260.52K)

Why are you a creationist?

so far i noticed humanitys origen is middle eastern. At least the civilized part.
First bones and cave paintings are found there.
The oldes building is 12.000 year old and found in modern day Turkey.
Many mysts and old storys seen also have there first mention around there.
But maybe this is all bullshit and under africans jungle and sand is the first born buryed.

Niggers are 80.9% cromagnon
0.1% Neanderthal
19% errectus

Try and find anywhere on this planet with zero racists..

14,000 year old settlements are off the coast of Washington
First metal working was in Michigan
Punics may have originated in the Americas

>>so racism is just silly
>Hating somebody for something they have no control over is silly. Acknowledging objective biology is the definition of intelligence.

Yes, we need to get past the idea that scientific racism implies hatred. It is now literally illegal to tell the truth about race on a college campus, and students are not allowed to learn the truth, and professors will be expelled for teaching the truth. This is bizarre.

>Europeans been in Europe since 38,000 B.C.
>Not considered indigenous.
>Maori's been in New Zealand since 500 A.D.
>Considered indigenous.

A pure sapien is like a base model car, it's only when my ancestors fucked neanderthals and the asians fucked denisovians you get the upgraded version

If black people are similar why don't they go live with eachother?

Why do they need to live in white countries?

The out of Africa theory has been completely deboonked by modern genetic science. The first early modern humans definitely were not like the sub-saharan blacks of today.
The first modern humans probably came from the Levant region or north Africa and probably looked very similar to the swarthy people living there today.
Some of those early humans interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovians, who were basically a subspecies of homo sapiens and then started travelling north and east, and eventually became the ancestors of Whites and Asians.
Meanwhile, a different group travelled south further into Africa. They started mating with a much more primitive and ape-like hominid species. The offspring of these human/hominid pairings became the ancestors of sub-saharan blacks.
Some ethnic groups in Africa have such different DNA compared to all other humans that they really shouldn't even be considered part of the same species.

t. Unbiblical niggers

the early humans mated with monkeys and created niggers