>Children can't consent
Circular reasoning. The argument goes: Sex between adults and children is wrong regardless of whether harm is caused, because children can't consent.
The rebuttal: Children consent all the time, to non-sexual acts, so why is sex different? "Because it's likely to cause harm", i.e. circular reasoning.
>Sex IS harmful
It isn't, only our perverted western culture treats it that way. Simple "yes" or "no" consent is all that is required to avoid bad outcomes, furthermore CSA is an empirically invalid pseudoscience, studies which supposedly find a correlation between involvement in a sexual relationship with an adult as a child and psychological harm don't control for factors like home environment and presence of consent: newgon.net
>They can't understand the consequences of sex
The consequences of sex? Like an orgasm? inb4 roastie tier screeching about muh feelingzz muh seckz is sacred
>Children can be manipulated into doing anything
Presumes all pedophiles wish to manipulate children, also presumes children actually can be manipulated into doing anything (try making a kid eat brussel sprouts)
>"Grooming"
i.e. the courtship process in a relationship you believe to be invalid
>Any variation of "pedophiles are all bad people"
Not true, people react hysterically at the mention of pedophilia, so pedophiles aren't open about their orientation, so you don't hear from them outside of the rare case which hits the news cycle.
>Physical harm
Overwhelming majority of sex between adults and children does not involve penetration, "sex play" is more of an appropriate term
>Children don't have a sexuality/don't want sexual intimacy with adults
Not true in the slightest, children have orgasms and even fetuses have been observed having orgasms.
>You are a pedo
Yes.
>Post your address
Post yours and I'll meet you at your place instead :-)
Why do age of consent laws exist?
>The argument goes: Sex between adults and children is wrong regardless of whether harm is caused
Wrong. The argument is it causes harm and it doesn't matter if the child consents or not. That harm takes the form of promiscuity, becoming an abuser, drug use, the I ability to form healthy relationships as an adult.
You just disagree that that's harm.
Why don't we just hang all the pedophiles
Slaaneshi demon
Because lynching is illegal and most of the western countries abolished deaths penalty.
When the adult truly cares, and a loving relationship forms, sex between an adult and his or her student can be the best thing in the world.
If you disagree, you're either ignorant or delusional.
Tldr, groomer. Get the fuck off of my board and mutilate yourself.
Shalom shekelsteinburg, daily spamming I see. 1 rubel was deposited into your account.
Okay, can you post your address so I can come and kill you?
Yes, this is a threat.
Thank you.
is this the cunny thread?
Feels bad man
UOHhhhhh!!!
well?
Women are already too easily manipulated.
Children are also easily manipulated.
>Presumes all pedophiles wish to manipulate children
Well yeah. That's what makes them a pedophile.
Because kids are gullible retards who would all get pumped and dumped by old creepy groomers like you if there were no consequences for fucking them under a certain age
Yes the state should have no business in if I fuck my daughter or not.
to increase police reliance
Children are manipulated to eat brussels sprouts all the time, with no one to stop it or determine the level of manipulation. Now apply that freedom to manipulate with sex. You open them up to all sorts of abuse, with much greater mental and physical impact and risk than eating fucking brussels sprouts.