Can someone explain the physics of a skyscraper collapsing in on itself? Was it really jet fuel and fires that brought down 2 110 story structures?
Can someone explain the physics of a skyscraper collapsing in on itself...
Caleb Hughes
Other urls found in this thread:
wikispooks.com
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
Robert Peterson
Jack Long
4 planes, 4 buildings.
Mysterious explosions.
Perfect demolition.
Jace Wilson
They would've buckled at least somewhat because the damage was at the upper part of the building.
Aaron Hill
No planes
Bentley Richardson
You'll notice how kikes like to push irrational conspiracies like faked moon landings, le illuminati/jesuits/masons, flat earth, hollow earth, Q, skull and bones, absurd 9/11 theories (there were no planes), lizard people etc. etc. to misdirect otherwise well-intentioned normies and to make people that discuss information outside of what the (((MSM))) gives us look retarded and to cover up for jews. Both here and on normie social media.
This is called well-poisoning and gas-lighting. Jews do this to keep normie goyim from looking into or thinking about legitimate non-MSM information too much, e.g. the jew subversion of our media and government or the exaggerations and outright lies surrounding the holohoax made for political gain.
9/11 is a good example... Israel had a big role in 9/11. How to well-poison this subject manner? Make sure any threads about 9/11 include discussion of "there were no planes", "it was CGI", "a nuke brought it down", "an energy weapon brought it down" etc. and other absurdities. This will get any normies to reject ALL non-MSM information about 9/11, including what they want to cover-up (Israel's role).
Jews control our media. Jews control our banking. Jews control our academia. Jews control our government. Very real and verifiable. Something everyday people need to know and understand. "But let’s not worry about that, goyim. Let’s discuss pyramid symbols, freemasons and lizard people".
Julian Cox
To further illustrate this, let's pretend "freemasons" are a legit thing in 2022.
Cancer SYMPTOMS would be things like = BLM, LGBT, feminism, trannys, degeneracy normalization, slavery which brought blacks to North/South america to begin with, socialism, communism, globalism, wokeism etc. etc. etc. and let's for the sake of argument throw "freemasons" in there.
The CANCER ITSELF = jews propagating these very symptoms
Yes, cancer symptoms suck, but one must address the cancer itself. Focusing on the symptoms is pointless. The symptoms will keep reappearing until the cancer itself is addressed. Attempts to get normies to be distracted by the symptoms and not focused on the cancer itself is jew obfuscation 101.
Something easy to notice: Note how jewtube is FULL of "conspiracy" videos about masons, illuminati, various other "secret societies", flat earth bullshit etc. etc.
Yet ANY video that even mildly mentions the jew gets instabanned and the channel deleted. Think about why that is.
James Phillips
Top of the buildings collapsed creating a cascading failure. The official story is that the same happened to building 7 but that one was clearly demolished.
Nicholas Hall
What a beautiful day. This was done like an action movie, no denying that.
Sebastian Carter
Liam Baker
Easton Martin
Chase Lewis
if one was demolished, then they all were.
Ian Jones
Here's an aftermath of where the twin towers were located
Cameron Cook
Want a politically incorrect comment? Try this. The obesity crisis correlated with a historic plunge in child abuse. Maybe people got fat when a bunch of child abusers failed to breed.
Correlation doesn't mean causation, of course. My husband says even lab rats are showing increasing obesity rates, suggesting aerosol contamination.
Maybe we're all being gassed with "get fat and have fewer kids" compounds. Focus on REAL conspiracies! The public may be getting destroyed by the hatreds of a tyrannical eugenicist elite.
The consequences are unironically dysgenic if so. We need gene therapy rollouts to overcome the damage done by attempts to punish the public for reproducing too much. We also need to start openly taking responsibility for our reproductive futures and voluntarily constraining reproduction so conspiratorial reduction of reproduction is no longer necessary.
The destruction of those towers was financially convenient, but there are still bigger, more pervasive issues.
Kevin Garcia
Elijah Hughes
Jordan Sanchez
>explain the physics of a skyscraper collapsing in on itself?
punch a hole in a skyscraper filled with flammable paper and office supplies, spray thousands of gallons of jet fuel all over, light it up, let the air suck in with hurricane force to make a flamethrower with temps around 2000 degrees, wait a half hour or so for the steel to soften and buckle, let gravity take over, what the fuck is so hard for retards to understand
Jacob Jackson
It's because they don't understand it.
Oliver Myers
these pilots went way to high on the tower. You’d think if they were risking their lives for this they’d do it the right way and aim for the middle
Isaac Lopez
Caleb Powell
awesome photo
Jace Long
The WTC's exterior was a steel skeleton that gave the buildings most of their strength, of cour there was steel beams connected to the elevator cores, but most of the strength came from the steel structure on the outside. Sandniggers crashed planes through this. Planes went boom, big hole in steel structure. Loads where the steel was are now transferred elsewhere. The explosion caused large, hot fires. The fires weaken the steel even more. Steel begins to yield and can no longer hold loads like it did at full strength, combined with now even more loads the steel fails. Building falls down. KSA probably funded it all. Bush either knew and didn't care or wanted it to happen to satiate crazy Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld's blood thirst and finishing his daddy's war.
Jaxson Clark
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Kayden Russell
Except NIST explains how that's impossible with the amount of time the buildings were burning to heat up to a temp like that to melt steel beams let alone cut them
Benjamin Wood
Everyone makes mistakes.
>risking their lives
They were in for a martyrdom operation, they did not expect to survive.
Noah Nguyen
Luke Anderson
it is amazing how that raghead came in so low to the ground
Asher White
Kevin Jackson
No one said melt or cut.
Dominic Jenkins
complete and utter bullshit
Gavin Myers
remember when glowies memed the 'jet fuel can't melt steel' line and 4chin spazzes lapped it up?
Thomas Cruz
Yeah they had incredible determination to do this shit. They literally turned themselves into trained pilots just to kill themselves as they crash the planes inside the twin towers. Religion is a mindfuck.
Austin Jones
Ah, the old jet plane, office supplies flamethrower theoy... Debunked.
Jose Martin
truth is that the original WTC complex was built with shitty materials and not up to code
it was covered up to prevent a massive insurance payout
the towers were not built correctly
Brandon Howard
Levi Watson
check wtc 7
controlled demolition
all 3 towers perfectly collapsed into themselves, none toppled over
Evan Miller
Asher Cooper
Ryan Bell
Leo Martinez
Thomas Ross
If the metal did just "soften" the building would have tipped over into other buildings not explode like it did
Dominic Watson
What makes you think it should topple over?
Jose Phillips
I see no plane
Jacob Rodriguez
>wait a half hour or so for the steel to soften and buckle
Wouldn't the fall have been a lot more random in nature then, and not straight down? It looks like a controlled demolition, which is why people have misgivings. This steel melting and bending out of shape to affect the structural integrity story would require that all the columns failed at the exact same time at the same height, which is absolutely absurd. Occams razor says the columns were cut, the buildings were strategically demolished. The use of planes then only indicates an effort to cover up the use of demolitions.
Bentley Nelson
Please look up the plastic limit of steel. What makes you think it would have tipped over?
Daniel Jackson
>the towers were not built correctly
bullshit, they were built correctly, look how they didnt buckly on impact from a plane 3x the size of the original impact design criteria, its just they were a sparse lattice of fairly small beams, if you look at the building with the skin removed
Carter Edwards
Look it up then NIST workers have came out saying there was tampering with the investigation and computer simulation models they were conducting. Do some work lazy mf instead of just spouting bullshit off
Mason Bailey
The explanation that fires randomly weakened their structural integrity.
Liam Reed
WTC 7 collapsed due to fire
It came from an art project slowly taking constant pictures of the twin towers, to display the daily life in NYC, IIRC. That's why it wasn't a video, rather it was just pictures.
Cameron Sullivan
>thousands of gallons of jet fuel
gone after the fireball
>let the air suck in with hurricane force
?????
> 2000 degrees
office papers and chairs do not burn that hot, even jet fuel needs an engine to burn that hot
Brayden Sanchez
You have no idea how hard it is to cut columns, let alone columns in the middle of office space, you know, behind walls and shit.
Lincoln Watson
Christopher Clark
Newton's laws you know basic physics
Ryan Harris
>randomly
John Reyes
Controlled demolition. Plain as day.
Easton Morgan
>Wouldn't the fall have been a lot more random in nature then, and not straight down? It looks like a controlled demolition
jfc, ockham's razor, the weight is the slab floors not the fucking walls, all it takes is one floor to slam in to the next and that is all she wrote, floors gonna fall straight down, tell me where Newton's law shows any lateral force to make it tip
Christopher Sullivan
One very interesting fact is that 90% of the people who died in this were in Tower 1 above the crash. It took out all the stairwells. Tower 2 there were still open stairwells and was largely evaced. Almost no one above the first plane hit got out.
Grayson Cox
I never said random. Even if it were random what makes you think they would topple over?
Jason Carter
Lincoln Miller
Newton's law simple shit NIST even explains this
Isaiah Thompson
Actual the physical impact and massive tonnage of the jet is probably enough over time. And the skyspcraper load bearing members are built on an angle, so if they fail, it doesnt fall over and crush 20 other buildings. It really happened, people who deny this are the same kikes that danced for it.
However the LIE is that some fucking arabs did it.
Owen Watson
Christopher Williams
It would take a lot of thermite to make precise cuts. Like enough to leave a molten pool of steel in a crater afterwards. They would have to all be cut at the same exact height and time, or else the building wouldn't fall straight down like it did.
I'm supposed to believe a fire did this though.
Ryder Martinez
Someone debunked that debunk though
Camden Allen
they got out, just not the way they wanted to.
Brayden White
The truth about 9/11 is the most powerful blackmail material out there. Imagine possessing documents that prove, unequivocally, the involvement of a nation state in those events. Anyone having that kind of information would already be dead. Unless, of course, they baked that information into some sort of dead-mans switch that already exists out there and just needs a key to decrypt.
Dylan King
I thought the ending would turn into a jew nose
Noah Roberts
Oliver Rivera
that would explain the chunk weakened by the plane collapsing and the tower breaking up, not the whole tower symmetrically collapsing in its foot print
Nathaniel Davis
The momentum and impact of the Fake Planes...
Andrew Foster
You don't even realize you don't need "thermite" to cut steel.
Eli Perez
>> 2000 degrees
>office papers and chairs do not burn that hot, even jet fuel needs an engine to burn that hot
your mind is too small to comprehend it, ever heard of a bellows? You would be surprised at the power of forced oxygen in a fuel and paper fire
Xavier Hughes
I went to school to be an engineer. I still haven't solved the mystery.
Owen Brown
because the impact of the plane was off centered, only one side of the building was hit
Ryan Powell
Anthony Sanchez
That is how fire behaves. It doesn't evenly heat everything at the same time and cause steel beams to all fail at the same height and time.
The absolute absurdity of the official story is proof that the propaganda has worked, and that they no longer care about convincing people, but rather about demoralizing those who won't lap up their lies.
Thomas Gomez
what bellows?
Caleb Brown
NIST worker explains how that's impossible for fire to heat up to a temp that high over the period of time it took the towers to collapse.
Ayden Perry
yes randomly on 9/11 the laws of physics changed and an aluminum airplane frame destroyed 2ft thick steel girders, like 15 of them, then the jet fuel weakened the beams causing structural failure, then the laws of physics changed back and 1hr of jet fuel fire will not weaken steel to this degree, also aluminum aiplane frames wont destroy 2ft of steel anymore especially the the ones that are just hit by wing.
Brody Ward
notice how the ‘experts’ itt have yet to mention israel?
>da saudis
>terrorists pulled it off
>bush did it
if there’s any goy in here who doesn’t have the facts, go watch ryan dawson’s two docus on israel’s conspiracies against the american people. and then for the fuller picture, read michael collins piper’s final judgement, its a doozy but well worth the read.
John White
м
Brandon Wright
People could just say fuck it and destroy Israel without whatever ZOG kikes consider to be enough proof?
Ryder Long
it looks walks and quacks like controlled demolition
Adam Ward
It's pretty weird, but I have seen this used in different ways, as a drone, as a holographic projection, live video edition and all. While the blurry noses can be due artifacts, the last one isn't viable, at least the momentum needs to be incredibly high compared with the mass it was smashing; but the thing is the plane would need and incredible acceleration to do so; something like the supposed ufos disappearing of the image; the planes lacks the medium to reach such acceleration and the event of being able the people (along all the things inside the planes) would go jelly at that point.
Justin Moore
>Someone debunked that debunk though
dont need to melt the fucking steel to weaken it, just needs to weaken and buckle, 2000F ought to do that quite nicely
Jeremiah Walker
It’s what we get for supporting Israel
Aiden Phillips
Building don't freefall from a fire. Simple as.
Elijah Thompson
Yes NIST even explains this it suprises me how many people here dont know Newtons laws
Logan Cox
>cause steel beams to all fail at the same height and time.
Lies no one says all steel beams all failed at once, the building didn't just vaporize out of nowhere.
It cut a hole through the structural integrity causing the top floors to fall down, the weight of which caused a pancake. The authorities who built it who said a pancake wasn't possible were trying to save their own neck which is why a lot of these conspiracies exist (Including many other things)
Mason Cook
>because the impact of the plane was off centered, only one side of the building was hit
fuel very efficiently sprayed all the fuck over up down and sideways duhhhhhhh
David Moore
Here's what it may have looked like inside WTC Tower 1 on 911.
Robert Turner
office fires do not burn that hot
the jet fuel was mostly consumed in the fire ball
there are no "bellows", whatever that means
if buildings did this they'd be collapsing all of the time in ordinary fires
Michael Morales
Brandon Garcia
Jet fuel burns at a hot enough temperature to cause the beans to fold in on themselves causing the collapse. A dude on YouTube demonstrated it.
Jaxon Hill
The pancake bullshit theory has been debunked Newtons laws prove it's not possible.
James Ortiz
>Building don't freefall from a fire. Simple as.
morons cant grasp temperature and weight, simple as.
Austin Scott
Most of the fuel was consumed upon the initial second, but not all.