How will Any Forums survive the Great Filter

Attached: 03114446.png (738x678, 86.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/business/energy/saudi-arabia-reveals-oil-output-is-near-its-ceiling/2022/07/20/eff7aff6-081b-11ed-80b6-43f2bfcc6662_story.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Can Any Forums servers survive high energy prices?

Attached: file.png (596x641, 94.12K)

spaceniggers will find the servers in the ruins of earth and put the website back online. we'll all rise from the dead to continue our shitposting.

Attached: 1628826653932.jpg (520x600, 26.53K)

If only we could harness the power of women's lies

We just need solar panels and wind

So, why does nuclear have to replace all oil, coal, gas and firewood generation?

>Replace gas fired heat with electric
Why?
>include firewood in calculation
Nigga whut?

is there even enough uranium/plutonium/thorium for 46434 nuclear reactors?

Monke mode

Attached: 20220803_060030.jpg (1410x1584, 565.97K)

because globohomo said so

Try doing to the above calculation for solar and wind, we need to build impossible number of wind mills and solar panels.

See pic. Traditional biomass is Davos speak for firewood.

Because even Saudis can't produce enough oil: washingtonpost.com/business/energy/saudi-arabia-reveals-oil-output-is-near-its-ceiling/2022/07/20/eff7aff6-081b-11ed-80b6-43f2bfcc6662_story.html

Attached: file.png (217x274, 23.35K)

And energy from solar, wind, hydro, tidal, many types of waste, geothermal, certain viable crops (wood is a classic example), improvements in energy efficiency, ... which are forbidden topics for your gay mafia except for some crap that barely works.

Because this is a clickbait article using arbitrary, unachievable criteria to scare readers.
You don't need to replace everything with nuclear.
Technology advances, especially if first world governments start getting serious about nuclear investment again.
Ultimately, if energy supply doesn't meet the needs, someone's going to get fucked and live with rolling blackouts. It ain't going to be the countries with nuclear weapons and world-class militaries.

If everything is impossible then who cares.

Try doing the OP calculation for number of solar panels and number of windmills. You will need entire countries to just manufacture solar panels and windmills.

Your little pic is filled with assumptions.
Most nuclear reactors online today are for military purposes.
You also fail to consider thorium reactors and you assume that all current reactors are as efficient as they could be.

Someone mentioned nuclear was jewed to the point its output is the same as a natural gas power plant, but the original idea was a massive output from a single power plant.
Part of the problem is the extremely low efficiency (usually more than two thirds of wasted energy as heat), but you can be sure it was jewed even more than that.

Not every country deserves access to modern electricity. Cut off everywhere outside of Europe and the Anglosphere, problem solved.

>Technology advances, especially if first world governments start getting serious about nuclear investment again.


What a mid wit take , someone else will invent something that saves us"

You guys are fucking morons

I approve this message.

Attached: polpot and te club of rome.jpg (816x1228, 739K)

It would be more efficient to reduce the population by 90% or more. I call it the "Great Killoff"