Why did anyone think this would work? It was retarded from the start

Why did anyone think this would work? It was retarded from the start.

Attached: A618BC44-9283-466F-BCF5-A1891B39F93A.jpg (628x688, 71.18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=9gUZOuA4_4M
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

CBS “newz”….comment discarded

No one on the right ever said it would "trickle down". They said it was right that people get to keep more of the money they earn as long as it's not illegally made. It wasn't about helping the poor, it was about doing the right thing. More of an idealistic view than a practial one but it was never framed as "the poor are the top concern".

where they read news, I read jews

You're still bitching about Reagan

You can't handle responsibility and will never even be relevant to western politics again after the transition we're currently in

Never even relevant again. You blew your entire load 20 or so years after the internet was popularized.

The most embarrassing downfall in human history

As usual, the left always assume that the thing THEY care about is the thing everyone cares about. "What are the Republicans doing for trans rights?" as if anyone on the right gives the slightest shit about that. Your left wing fantasy isn't my reality.

how come there's never articles about latin america saying "50 years of massive tax cutes have failed"???

tax rates*** fuck me

gibsmedat

Nobody ever thought it would work, it's just a straw man to beat the right with

you're an absolute retard if you think the government should be hoovering up more of the economy to spend on bullshit. lmao "muh fair share!". Bad news, only the worst of corporate America can survive high taxes and regulation. They are in the same bed as government and even write or influence all of the bills that dictate taxation and regulation. The Federal government needs to downsize by a lot, that's the true answer.

Attached: 1640024276828.jpg (530x692, 136.09K)

The right never even said trickle down economics
It just said taxation = bad

You know why. Commies through and through. I just wish the right had the same thing with fascism. Why can't we have thousands of politicians who are secretly fashy and not just spineless cucks.

Because these scum always find loopholes and tax havens + offshore banks to horde their wealth. The problem has only gotten more severe since Reagan's time

>only ever litigates income taxes
>why do the rich keep getting richer?
Maybe because they transferred 4 TRILLION from the middle class to the upperclass with the latest lockdown and you cheered it on?

>we asked all the local golems and they agree, its better to pay more to the government!
lel

One post faggot. If it was so bad, why didn’t Clinton, Obama, or Biden do anything about it. Dumb fuck.
People who earn money should keep more of their money.

>As usual, the left always assume that the thing THEY care about is the thing everyone cares about.
Correct. People should have known better than to think Reagan and co gave a fuck about helping the blue collar American workers.

> it was about doing the right thing
The right thing for giant corporations exporting the jobs overseas so they could maximize profit even if it damages the nation, to be specific.

there should be no income taxes at all. Nor should there be inheritance taxes.

The right thing as they saw it, yeah.

>Posts literal who from Twitter.
Lol nigger tier.

Never underestimate the delusional belief and narcissism of american exceptionalists

Taxes hurt blue collar workers more than any other thing on earth other than injury or illness.
Go fuck yourself you faggot-loving "progressive" leech parasite fuck. People should be allowed to keep the money(the representation of work over time) they earn without government touching it. What the fuck does government even do for people besides get us all into wars we don't wanna fight?
Fucking CANCER.

Attached: 1488559186615.png (2000x1334, 657.05K)

you are an idiot. you want cheap products? you want lower inflation? then allow companies to maximize profit and send jobs overseas where people work for dollars a day.
Oursourcing has enabled the usa to utilize billions of people who work for slave wages. That can only benefit the american citizen and the american worker, because their wage can buy more things, because things are cheaper to make overseas. if everything was made here, by americans, it would be incredibly expensive.

The closest thing is Bolsonaro and Bukele and guess what, these guys are "fascists" because the media keep calling them fascist. Talk to any Salvadorean out there, the ony ones that dislike bukele are the ones that were living from gibbies, either because they were part of the previous corrupt governments, or because they had friends in there.

It did work. It made the rich richer. Anyone who thought they would use their wealth to better the economy or pay their employees competitive wages is a fucking retard. Neocons get the rope right next to the shitlibs.

Study finds OP is a faggot. Well, must be true since it was a study.

Attached: 1327757656745.jpg (600x400, 38.9K)

“Trickle Down” was never a serious economic theory anywhere ever. It’s not in a single textbook described as a coherent concept. Thomas Sowell wrote on this extensively, and disproved this retarded leftist straw man. Trickle down is and only ever was a straw man spouted by ignorant leftists.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=9gUZOuA4_4M

KYS op

It wasn't meant to work

Attached: 212rli.jpg (1084x724, 64.63K)

Tax cuts are retarded without spending cuts.

>It did work. It made the rich richer.
yes, asset holders do get richer because the feds keep debasing the currency.
I want all Americans to keep all their money so they can invest it in assets that beat inflation and protect them from currency debasement. there should be no income taxes, capital gains taxes, or inheritance taxes.

>Tax cuts are retarded without spending cuts.
Tax cuts force spending cuts.
I think what you mean is that tax increases are pointless because the government will just spend more money and find itself in the same situation of needing more money.