Heart disease projected to surge

Ischemic heart disease +31.1%
Heart failure +33.0%
Myocardial infarction +30.1%
sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109722052627

Attached: heart.jpg (1766x753, 149.18K)

it's anything related to covid, vax or no vax included, right?. Was it a bioweapon?

The vaccines are safe and effective. How much more research do you need before you'll accept this?

>American diet

I need a trial on the vaccine that has a control group.

yeah, I'm thinking people are getting too fat nowadays

It'd be immoral to not try to vaccinate everyone.

it would me immoral to push a vaccine that you don't have a baseline to compare it to.

Everything causes heart attacks and blood clots except the vaccines.

Attached: very_sads.jpg (1024x919, 253.04K)

I'd need at least one long-term study on the technology. Preferably more than one. You should get someone to start doing one, and maybe I'll consider taking these mRNA treatments in a couple of decades.

>Among White individuals, the prevalence of CV risk factors and disease is projected to decrease, whereas significant increases are projected in racial and ethnic minorities.

niggers btfo by science

can't do long term studies any longer user. there is no control group with which to do so.
they would have to get completely uncoof vaxxxed people to go through the entire process of getting it while comparing it to a portion of the population that is does not. AKA starting from the beginning again. But if they did that they would have to admit that the testing that they already completed and is the basis upon which all of the pushing it is already done was garbage data with no baseline. So it is never ever going to happen.

It's everything BUT the mRNA shot

>it would be immoral to not force things onto people
It would be immoral to let you live.

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

Attached: vax.webm (640x480, 2.51M)

it's the high nicotine content vapes

ARE YOU OKAY VAXXXIE
ARE YOU OKAY?

Sure they could. They would have to find people who have not taken any mRNA treatments who would be willing to be a part of a long-term study of course. Then you do a proper double-blind over several years (at least 5, preferably 10 since it's a completely novel tech with not proper testing on it.) Then you keep track of these groups and the potential health problems they encounter in a broad-spectrum way over the course of the study.

It's not really hard to do, although you'd probably have to pay the participants handsomely, since experimental drugs is pretty risky. But it's not like we haven't done this before many times. There's absolutely no reason to not do a single long-term study on this weird experimental shit 80% of the population has injected itself with. We should start yesterday.

>theres no reason not to do long term studies
But muh short term profits suffer. So immediately put this on the market and retroactively change TOS for vaccines and participation. Easier that way, and less time consumed.

Attached: its_aids.png (680x485, 550.49K)

funny thing. I use chewing tobacco. I quit about half way into the pandemic, and kept everything else in my life the same. was around people with covid the whole time, didn't really care about it, never caught the coof. Went through nicotine withdrawal. It sucked. Then about a month after quitting I got sick with the coof. I was out of it for about 2 days. But the nicotine withdrawal was worse.

Well, it's ludicrous and offensive to have the corporations who stand to profit from their product be the only ones doing the testing on said product in the first place. That's not how a society should operate when it comes to completely new technology. Some independent faction needs to do it.

you missed the entire second half of it user. they are in to deep on the lies now to admit that they falsified their initial studies.

I agree on principal. But its cannot be implemented in the current world, as it requires trust and responsibility. Both of which are long gone, or out the door. Its all about the Benjamins.