Why are women in general having a harder time noticing (accepting) that we increasingly live in clown world?
Examples: nigger crime, catastrophic economical situation, trying to refute that monkeypox is a faggot thing
Is it because social media is for young women what tv was for boomers?
because they are emotional and not logical
You can play on the emotional by sending the Mollie Tibbets story, or the outrageous story about kids suddenly having monkeypox
They will react emotionally be disturbed but after a while the programming comes back…
I could observe the same thing with some men, Mollie Tibbets father for example
but user think about the jummy tacos
Because women lack a brain and only think in emotions
>Why is it harder for stupid people to notice things?
The ultimate Bugman diversity argument
But I hear it less and less often for some reason
In general women seem to be less able to admit reality. That's why you never get advice about women from women. They lie to themselves and everyone else.
If a women see a story about I white girl killed by an immigrant she will relate you will see it
The issue is that after a few days it’s gone and the diversity programming takes over once again
>Why is harder for women to..... (insert anything)
they are dumber and weaker
/thread
Yeah typically they will say what you want to hear to make you «feel good»
Had a friend that started a business because 2 women told him it would work, well he is broke
Women instinctively conform to the authority that provides, that is socially safe. If women are anti globohomo, they face being ostracized and attacked by the members of society that are supposed to protect them. So they delude themselves and irrationally rationalise that globohomo clownworld = safe out of necessity.
This is untrue. I think men are much more likely than women to base their beliefs on emotions, and there is nothing wrong with that. Nationalism, for example, is an intrinsically emotional ideology. Love, beauty and loyalty are ideals that are inherently emotional, but are very often used as a basis for providing strength to a political ideology. Women on the other hand don't consider their ideology from neither an emotional nor logical perspective. They stand completely outside of such considerations and instead base their views on arbitrary factors such as what the majority thinks or just status quo. Every woman I have ever discussed politics with gives off the impression that she doesn't really know what she thinks, only what she is supposed to say. They are like children in the sense that they rarely question what they hear, making them a direct threat to democracy. Why children are not allowed to vote but women are, is one of the most important questions of the century.
Women are the clowns
All the spergs calling women dumb are just coping. They're not "dumb" they run a completely different program, by nature they submit to power/social pressure because that's what protects babies. Going against the status quo for "principles" could harm her offspring, they're built to internalize the current power structure and just roll with it.
>Why is harder for women to notice clown world
because they cause 80% of it
Women don't face darwinian pressure from social sources. Women are always valuable because eggs are more valuable than sperm. If there is a war, women always get to fuck the winner and thus their genetic line doesn't end due to war. Consequently they never needed to evolve a need to care about conditions that lead to war. In fact women benefit from creating the conditions that lead to war since this filters out the unfit men. Women need conflict to know which men they should be fucking. They can't fuck the winners if there is no conflict to divide men into winners and losers. In the absence of conflict women start getting uncomfortable because they don't know if the men they are fucking are winners or not. This is why women create drama etc. Drama is just war on a smaller scale. The drive to create petty drama and the drive to create clownworld are the same thing, just on different scales. They are both reflections of the female sexual impetus => create conflict to separate winners from losers so they can feel confident that the men they are fucking are winners.
Exactly. Women pick the winning team fucking obviously. The winning team could be rotten, it doesn't matter, they're winning.
Principles and virtue are for delusional men.
Principles and virtues *without power are for delusional men. If you have the ability to impose your will, upstanding moral virtue is a worthwhile thing to rule society with. Without the required men and horses you're right, martydom is overrated.
i think it is because they naturally follow power/authority, so if the government (or whatever the top of their social hierarchy is) says it's not clownworld, then it isn't clownworld.
fpbp
>They're not "dumb" they run a completely different program, by nature they submit to power/social pressure
This, which is why authoritarians in media etc try to normalize "women in power". If you put people in formal positions of power who just submit to the people who manufacture consensus, then they are only in power as a formality. Every time you replace a man in power with a woman, you are actually centralizing power in the media's hands, because those women are just sockpuppets for the media. If you asked people
>Should CNN control 50% of society?
they would say no, but if you replace "CNN" with "women" then people say yes, even though women "in power" is just CNN in power via proxy. Women are an authoritarian's dream, and it's no coincidence that every authoritarian seems to want more women in formal positions of power, and that most societies that have taken the bait have spiraled into authoritarianism.
this
Because they made it to their own liking
Well said. Women aren't able to critically think the same way men are since they have to rationalize their own irrational confirmative actions.
Look at this fucking AI defending women.
Nationalism isn't emotional. Its basically an extension of the natural instinct of loyalty to one's tribe and in a hunter-gatherer society, that would mean the difference between life and death.
Because the price of Vaginoplasty and Hair Extensions has not kept up with inflation.
Women don’t care about being right or noticing what is real, they literally only care about being in the majority. If they “never noticed it” they’ll just say “no one noticed it happening” when it gets even worse. If it doesn’t get way worse they’ll say “no one actually thought it was going to get way worse, you’re such a weirdo”. If they notified it and it gets way worse and they acknowledged that they had noticed it they would feel “different” and this would be an unpleasant feeling to them. To a woman “good different” is a different hair shade than anyone they see regularly, a “bad different” is realizing they are in the minority in any thought provoking situation because it risks being in the minority which is incorrect.
When I worked in building compliance, i often dealt with men and it was simple to visit building sites and do my job.
On the occasions i had to deal with females, it was "holy fuck" they really are as thick as dogshit. Some women would say to me "whats compliance" or "I just do what I want to do, I didn't even know the building code existed"
I often would just give a written warning to males to fix things and they mostly did
With females I always double dosed them with a statutory fine no warnings. then fine them again when they neglect to fix defects
This is a good point, it's just stacking up yes votes for whatever the current program is. Much harder to swing their opinion without a massive emotional trigger.
This guy gets it. Women are women and men are men, they're not the same thing and can't be judged by a man's standards. Most of the seething on this board comes from retards who don't understand that.