Anal sex with 10 year old Tunisian boys in a cemetery is something you kinda need to be an intellectual well read on post structuralist thought to truly understand... You just wouldn't get it...
>subverts literal logic and reality :3
>I'M SUBVOOORTING LOGOS HELP ME POLLUTE THE INTELLIGENTSIAS CONSCIOUSNESS WITH SULTRY ANAL FANTASIES GET IN HERE DELEUZE YOU CAN BE AN ANAL MAN TOO.
*dies of aids from being fucked in the ass*
And yes, the finger i'm chewing on had been up the little Tunisian boys bum moments before...
- Michel Foucault :3
What does Foucault have to do with your post? Hint: writing in comedy chevrons isn't going to help
He's a pedo who subverts logic and hierachy though his work you fucking gay Serb
Ad hominem
More like ad homonem.
You haven't read a single one of his books
He was an intellectual, but at the same time he was just another frog. What did you expect?
I've read madness and civilisation and sections of history of sexuality
Oof fags rekt
How does Madness subvert logic and hierarchy? How do you even subvert logic? You sound like a retard
His work is decent, however, he is a confirmed pedophile. I am still of the belief that you should separate ideas from the people that echo them. Ideas are more powerful and simply jump from host to host. The person is usually irrelevant, especially their background, actions or personal traits.
all french postmodern theory will be burned sorry. these fuckers ruined Marxist thought and turned it into the socialist bullshit which runs America.
>WRITING IN COMEDY CHEVRONS ISN'T GOING TO- ACK!
lol. he was a MASSIVE subverter. much of today's woke communism can be traced back to his work. the founding principles.
I don't think his background is irrelevant though. He was an aberrant and he knew it , that's what piqued his interest in madness and such in the first place
However his central research program (archeology of knowledge) is completely original and mostly unrelated to his obsessions
Based and truthpilled.
I agree wrt his general theories, but I asked where he did that in Madness and civilization. It's not very theoretical
Whenever anybody brought up Foucault in uni I'd just bring up that he was a pedo to immediately derail the discussion.
That isn’t ad hominem, you stupid nigger jew
Based as fuck. No other approach necessary
Every French philosopher I read about is like "Jackes Pierre Andouille Poisson was in a militant left wing org in his 20s and in his 50s wrote several essays advocating to genocide muslims. He is also known for his extensive love letters to his 10 year old etnically dubious boyfriend.
Hilarious.
Very based.
>He's a pedophile
>refuse to elaborate
I had one week in class specifically focussed on post-structuralism and it was a bit of a shitshow in the seminars, but still a laugh. The next week an American PhD student gave a guest lecture basically dismantling Foucault and all the shit we'd been taught the previous week, and promoting Heidegger. Suffice it to say, we got on like a house on fire.
It's not confirmed at all. It's a stupid story told by an old faggot trying to sell a book. There's no evidence at all to support the claims and the story basically doesn't make sense in it's own terms.
He was a filthy pedo faggot with a first rate mind, and you're retarded niggercattle. I don't know what's worse. There's certainly a lot more of you
Foucault, like all French postmodernists, was a fucking hack. Stop defending intellectual pedoism.
lol stfu toothpaste. First rate minds don't buttblast nigglets.
>intellectual pedoism
Holy kek kill yourself
>you're retarded niggercattle
>From the guy who likes a third rate hack just because his uni prof told him to like it
Ok Achmed. Let me guess. You really like Nietzsche too.
I never liked this faggot,
Hes all about power in his essays but he puts it in an extremely materialist and exagerated way.no winder hes a pedo freak.
I hate frogs.