There was a thread about climate change, and one user was preaching about how we need to stop deforestation and yelling at everyone to stop deforesting! And I was gonna reply but the thread closed.
What makes you think anyone here on Any Forums owns a major lumber producing corporation? What makes you think anyone here will have any impact at all? Why would you even bother to say it here? Say it at a shareholder meeting for a lumber company or say it on twitter to the board of a lumber company. WTF good does it do to yell at a bunch of random anons on Any Forums about not deforesting? When have any of us here had any say when it came to a forest existing or not? WTF man.
Nobody on Any Forums is that influential, get a grip
Andrew Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Andrew Sanders
Nobody gives a shit
Ryder Nguyen
youtube.com
The Lost History of Flat Earth part FULL (1-7)
Ayden Ross
I am
Leo Gonzalez
retards don't have the balls to scream at the real people in charge so they screech here like mongs
Angel Scott
lol you fuckin liar heheheh
Mason Sanchez
It's the same reason you see bot threads with nonesense like "X is 100% true" or "he's right you know" or "powerful"
It's meant to plant an idea passively in anons heads. It's the a tactic that works on the human psyche. Repeated passive information will get passed on without research.
Fortunetly a number of people here will actually read into things.
Ask a normie anything that you hear repeated in news cycles and they will treat it as gospel regardless or reading into it.
Same tact.
The goal isn't to influence C suites It's to make you inclined to vote on green policies.
Aiden Murphy
according to a center for generational kinetics study in 2019 72% of the zoomer generation do believe that it is possible to make social impact by soley being a 'clicktivist' with any social movement without any other connection to it. maybe it was one of these idiots?
Mason Brown
I influenced you to reply.
Landon Scott
op is a faggot
I AM INFLUENTIAL
prove me wrong faggot
kek
Nicholas Gonzalez
Imagine being so incompetent that dream up this depop agenda and believe you can release a fake virus that the dumbest people will be scared enough to take a poison willingly, without question but it's about as useful as black innovation in the modern world. How pathetic. Get ready to bleed faggots.
Ryan Sullivan
It’s called “grassroots”, the concept has been around since the dawn of societal hierarchies. Nobody needs to own a lumber company, they just need to slowly build up pressure by spreading an idea that eventually will spill over a threshold that does influence lumber companies. Social media made the concept 10000x more effective and rapid.
Samuel Russell
If things are talked about here on a large enough scale, they usually tend to seep into other social media and can thus spread exponentially. And as a meme(in the sense of unit of information) spreads, society as a whole can pick it up and use it in discourses about the topic.
If more normalfags realized that reduction in carbon output means nothing, since it does nothing about the changes already happening, they would instead be more pro reforestation and combatting desertification, instead of stupid taxes and resource restrictions for the western world.
In short, the western world's middle class doesn't need economy destroying regulations, just implement video related on a global scale, and you change albedo to a great enough degree to problem free solve climate change.
youtube.com
Nathan Torres
Your potato opinion wasn't worth an entire thread you cringe faggot.
Josiah Gray
yeah but 3 of the 4 trees on my property have been cut down and burned for firewood, So I'm certainly not living up to the ideal of no-deforestation.
Chainsaw go BRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!
Michael Jenkins
If you want to substantially reduce deforestation, you have to change economic policy. For instance, to qualify for a home loan with a bank, a house needs to be "built-to-code". All these cookie cutter homes made from lumber and thin sheetrock are "built-to-code" or regulated to be built that way. Why? Because such homes aren't permanent structures and last 20-30 years before needing repairs to stop it from becoming dilapidated. The non-permanent structures are cheap because the economy and supply chain are structured around it, the short-term. Permanent structures use rocks, clay, etc. while more expensive, are more economical in the long-term. Additionally, culture can be ingrained and survive in permanent structures. If regulatory requirements were created that a certain percentage of housing in an area must be permanent structures with specific requirements of using rocks and resources in the local area at the local level and/or State-level, then the cost of permanent structures would drop and deforestation would decrease significantly.
TLDR: The issue is economic policy and this insane desire for unlimited growth in a finite environment. If you want to significantly decrease deforestation, then push regulatory requirements for the construction of permanent structures. This can be pushed at the local-level and work its way up to the State-level.
>law-fag pursuing environmental law specialization
Austin Ortiz
Pffft
Brody Bailey
Fuck yeah. I want a stone castle. Lets go back to living in stone forts like medieval knights during the crusades.
Anthony Morgan
LOIC
Don't fuck with cats
OK GROOMER
FBI user
Oliver Reed
It would be pretty cool as fuck, wouldn't it?
Ethan Taylor
As someone who has planted several fruit trees I consider myself influential.
Jason Allen
>projection thread
maybe you shouldn't assume everyone is just like you
Oliver Morgan
to those fruit trees you are God