>Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects what is defective congenitally. This gave the possibility to everyone to raise an objection and to say: How can natural things be defective so that they need to be perfected from outside, all the more because we know how useful the foreskin is for that member? In fact this commandment has not been prescribed with a view to perfecting what is defective congenitally, but to perfecting what is defective morally. The bodily pain caused to that member is the real purpose of circumcision. None of the activities necessary for the preservation of the individual is harmed thereby, nor is procreation rendered impossible, but violent concupiscence and lust that goes beyond what is needed are diminished. The fact that circumcision weakens the faculty of sexual excitement and sometimes perhaps diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened. The Sages, may their memory be blessed, have explicitly stated: It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision.
Banning circumcision outright is almost impossible, since kikes will kvetch endlessly. The most we can hope for realistically in America at least is making circumcision prohibitively expensive by cutting Medicaid and health insurance funding for circumcision. States where Medicaid doesn't cover circumcisions tend to have their circumcision rates cut in half. When people actually have to pay for it themselves, they don't bother. That's how much American "parents" care about their kids. A life-changing decision for their child, and it comes down to a few hundred dollars. Another potential tactic is requiring parents to be in the same room where the circumcision is performed so they can see for themselves how brutal it is.
>Another potential tactic is requiring parents to be in the same room where the circumcision is performed so they can see for themselves how brutal it is
They already do similar things for abortions. A bunch of states have mandatory ultrasounds before abortions in order to guilt trip potential mothers into keeping the baby.
Easton Johnson
This is the most politically incorrect topic on the board. Jannies eat shit.
>we have to mutilate the innocent baby's body because we are not able to successfully teach morality to the youth and maybe because we resent them, so we made up that the penis is bad and must be punished with blood to tame the instincts. In the future we will be practicing lobotomies at birth because the brain is also the source of many evils
