THIS

him that one old guy and Eugene are the biggest faggots who literally ride Trumps coat tails into fame its pathetic

That guy is literally a government bot on twitter.

Attached: 2nd amendment for dumbs.jpg (3012x1728, 1.06M)

Calling all nig nog drive by shooters! Spic ms13 gang members, inner city darkies! Turn in all your guns immediatly or have the local police force and swat come in and take them all away forcefully! Turn em in nigs. Do it now. We know you got em!

Attached: F46AA9A0-5227-4CA9-8B9F-83864FBDA1F3.jpg (1242x1795, 823.96K)

>blows hole through a person no where near your target
>musket ball at 54 caliber
>just as intended

Fuck off. This is just harvesting votes for the mid terms.

gas all of the jews.

Checked and no, just able bodied men ages 17-46

God I hate that faggot.

Attached: 1656041594669.jpg (1600x900, 182.13K)

Do these people not know what the Supreme Court is? Or are they intentionally being retarded so they can pretend to be outraged when the ban is thrown out?

wouldn't that mean i could make my own guns then?

hes right. since you are an originalist faggot the founders intended you to have a musket.

You won't do shit.

Ar15's are a very popular rifle, democrats are gonna piss a lot of people off going into the midterms

bring all war to texas

If its a musket that takes at least 30 minutes to reload a single shot, not an ar-35 weapon of war.

the founders had fucking cannons

Filter subject, filter comment, all fields, move on.
Bait kikes really need to step up their game, no one's falling for it anymore.

The largest voting bloc in the US is the single-issue voter on guns. They buried Clinton in the '96 midterms. They gave the shellacking to Obama in 2010.
And now, they will rip up Biden in 2020.

nothing is stopping you.

Attached: DSCN2352.jpg (2040x1530, 125.11K)

No they intended for us to have the same weapons as the government. I should be able to have tanks and nukes

if you need an essay to explain the law, you don't understand it.

[A well regulated militia],[being necessary for the security of a free state],[the right of the people to keep and bear arms],[shall not be infringed].

Clause A: A well regulated militia - as opposed to the Article 1, Clause 12 - is the people.
Clause B: The objective of the well regulated militia - laws do not have color text, they are statements of right, duty or ban. In this case, the duty of the militias is to maintain a free state.
Clause C: The right of the people to keep and bear arms - this is the same people as the people's militia and "a free state", it is not "the free state".
Clause D: No law shall abridge or curtail this law.
So:
The law is that "the people have the right to defend the state of freedom with a militia, and to achieve this the people have a right to keep and use weapons of war. Unlike other laws, congress shall pass no law curtailing this right."

Free speech only applies to letters written with a quill

>Thanks DNC Paid Spokesperson!

I don’t get why people cheer for the boot of the government being pressed on their necks.
From both sides

Attached: 04329377-E1AC-4D89-9DD1-27BD10A21F62.jpg (1024x841, 60.3K)

>Is this even a real person?4cxvok
It's twitter, so probably not

It says ARMS. THE RIGHT. SHALL NOT BE. TO BEAR AND KEEP ARMS ALL ARMS. NO INFRINGEMENT. COME AND TAKE THEM BITCH.

The musket was the military standard of the time. I hope gun control passes so we can get to the shoosting

Attached: gr8_voina_m8.png (1024x759, 1M)

Nobody is stopping you from picking up pipes, fireworks, ball bearings, and an electrical connector

I'm not even a burger and this cunt's tweets fuck me off. Buy an ad, pajeet. Checked.

This is the logic they use, and gay shit wasnt a thing back then. Bye bye faggots. I gotta go beat my slave.

The biggest kike lie is the assumption that "being necessary for the security of a free state" is a legal justification for the existence of the amendment. There's no reason to assume this given the lack of flavor text elsewhere. This is a statement of law - people's militias are to operate for the security of a free state. Not for profit, not for commerce, for the security of a free state. The state stops being free under tyranny. Because this is not an article 1 army, the right of people to own and use weapons of war shall not be infringed, nor shall their right to form militias for the defense of freedom.

>It was devised 4 people 2b able 2 protect themselves w same type of weaponry used by those from whom they might need protection
>same

Okay where are the citizen funded intelligence agencies, nuclear warheads, bioweapons and rail guns then you fucking idiot? In the hands of the fucking government. We take the bill.

If you can't understand the constitution then you don't belong in this country

>The House just voted to pass

Attached: 1432724756686s.jpg (250x241, 6.88K)

>advertises being a wholesome dad
You know what would be hilarious? If a nigger troon shot his kids in school.

yes. The government should own no weapons of war. All assets held by the government should be privately owned and used only if the people are willing to offer it freely (no quarter during war).

Attached: art-full_metal_jacket@2x[1].jpg (1180x740, 85.47K)

Not giving up anything, eat a dick OP. Sneed.