Some liberal faggot stealth edited the Wikipedia definition of a recession

Clown world

Attached: 6k00rmqy0fe91.jpg (2160x1375, 343.2K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=t52LB2fYhoY
xtools.wmflabs.org/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller's_knot
oeis.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>wikipedia
/thread

youtube.com/watch?v=t52LB2fYhoY A ZIONIST COURSE ON WIKI EDITING IN ISRAEL. OLDIE BUT GOODIE..........

wikipedia is useless for any subject except math. Especially political shit like economics, history, etc.

OMG I JUST REALIZED THE SPEAKER FOR THE EVENT IS NAFTALI BENNET THE CURRENT ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER. JESUS CHRIST..........

xtools.wmflabs.org/
use this tool when investigating wikipedia users/edits

I will expand on this for you and say that it's also useful as a first-pass on any subject, if only in order to follow the references listed by the article.
It's also useful for practical things in which politics could not reasonably intrude, such as en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller's_knot

Based (r)editor saved US from the collapse.
Instead of printing money all this time US should have just edited wikipedia.

There are some things regarding the occult that they don't even know how to edit. Like math, anything that requires advanced knowledge they are not able to touch, because they literally don't understand it. It's kind of funny if you think about it.

I agree. STEM articles are surprisingly well written, and I'm saying that as a person that double checks everything. Every time I double check the info with a textbook or articles from other websites (belonging to universities and so on) it's never so wrong as to make it useless. Just minor mistakes, maybe. Typos, a slightly wrong formula, missing info, etc. It's better than most other online and offline encyclopedias, except specialized ones. Specialized encyclopedias, databases, etc. Take for example:
oeis.org/