What u listening to Any Forums?

santeria better

>more 90's music

okay

youtube.com/watch?v=hs8y3kneqrs

i feel out of the loop

so i will post more 90's goodies
youtube.com/watch?v=T0_zzCLLRvE
youtube.com/watch?v=8NGemR1cqZQ
youtube.com/watch?v=CAxF31Cd4G8&list=PLfbcZzp7pXY8457rslntEahfZ_skU2ugp
youtube.com/watch?v=tVCUAXOBF7w

Attached: azazaz.png (655x388, 31.95K)

nah, I'm not a zoomer and I'm not soulless

but for the record, rap today is better

there was some good rap in the 90s
youtube.com/watch?v=qUg3hTnm4jU

but I mostly listened to white music then

the song I posted here was released in the year 2000

it's not zoomer music

didnt really listen to the song, only the intro of the instrumental
the lad is gifted, ngl, but technic-wise theres much better.
and by technic i mean theres an objective measure, which is the number of rhyming syllables you can produce (per verse. or not. sometimes you rhyme ABBA, or ABAB you get the drift)
->t. used to rap well enough to imitate famous rapper's flow
and by this metric, even niggerbabble is going down in quality, but only in aggregate
you still can find competent rappers even in recent times
youtube.com/watch?v=cxb9WjqzuMk
youtube.com/watch?v=74HaJcmgUBw
but those are rare and rarely exceed 3 syllables
unlike the likes of big pun or kool g rap who can hit 7-8 and sometimes entire verses in full rhyme

youtube.com/watch?v=-RVQeJPAW2U
>kool g rap
the lad basically invented modern rap

music is not measured by technique, it's measured by feeling, resonance. does it bump, does it flow, does it touch your soul, etc.

here's more of my favorite 90s music

youtube.com/watch?v=GHLDcJ7dVSQ

youtube.com/watch?v=xS3GiUAvjJ8

youtube.com/watch?v=e-LDY0hr3Z4

neat, would you rather drive a car after it was first invented or one today?

youtube.com/watch?v=PRarBnJso5Q

youtube.com/watch?v=WPmhz0zMUrA

youtube.com/watch?v=DoRP8Gp11-Q

>music is not measured by technique, it's measured by feeling, resonance. does it bump, does it flow, does it touch your soul, etc.

well, thats the difference between how a performer and a musician percieve music.
best example: jimi hendrix.
what he did (on his albums) wasnt technically very difficult.
the likes of eddie hazel eat jimi hendrix raw like for breakfast technically-wise
but we remember jimi hendrix and not eddie hazel
>eddie hazel was the better guitarist
>but jimi hendrix was a better artist
see what i mean?

yah, I view music as artistry, not as a science

youtube.com/watch?v=CxEFhUDrFsE

youtube.com/watch?v=9hFgnZWaigw
you want artistry, check this out:
youtube.com/watch?v=0pHjSSTIimY

beauty:
youtube.com/watch?v=9eeUHk7AY2g

youtube.com/watch?v=kVl9g4Hd1PY

females:

youtube.com/watch?v=tJuujqWo3ew

youtube.com/watch?v=7gt4Do-91fg

as i used to perform, obviously i see things differently
for me the metric is if i could do that

youtube.com/watch?v=yvJGQ_piwI0

youtube.com/watch?v=O4irXQhgMqg

youtube.com/watch?v=Uk1hCSA89fc

youtube.com/watch?v=EX5phFmbrU8&list=PL-ZQWi1enpUi9IF6BwLHMNWiVozAD9Npb

and obviously most often the answer is no kek

thug:

youtube.com/watch?v=Tz6OUIjtM6E

youtube.com/watch?v=_5hjjDMWTMQ

youtube.com/watch?v=5Lxzj2SFjkY

more future:

youtube.com/watch?v=C8PY-0k37Q4

eh, to each his own

my favorite Hendrix song:
youtube.com/watch?v=kYm3dSXKloA