Is China really going to invade Taiwan during Pelosi's visit? What do the top minds of pol think?

>Neither China nor the US would benefit in case of an armed conflict there.
How is taking back Taiwan not a benefit to China?

Doubt it. For a start to invade a place you need to prepare your forces first which takes weeks at best and would be noticed.

Because for decades China has been saying that if the US or Taiwan says they are not China, then China will invade Taiwan. So in order to avoid war, the US and Taiwan have been pretending that Taiwan is Chinese this entire time. The US has been ruled by weak faggots and Trump was trying to change that.

An armed conflict implies the usage of firearms, weapons and stuff that destroys property, factories and human lives.
Taiwan is the most importan island in the whole world, it supplies lots of fabless companies with silicon chips. Look at NVIDIA, AMD and such.
Also check balance of traid and export/imports between Taiwan, China and the US.

Attached: a77d358e3d21713a2d8bbdc6639dc7ab.jpg (235x345, 13.16K)

>taking back
Kill yourself paid shill

Attached: hyne9utif2e31.jpg (4520x3520, 551.47K)

Cute paws, but I think there's still enough hardcores left in the US military, though it gets worse by the year.

>During Pelosi's visit
Are you fucking kidding me? Of course not. The Chinese may be chinks but they're not entirely stupid.

>someone will cuck out, thats for sure
Yeah we saw that earlier this year, when the whole ukie-russland shit hit the fan.

Attached: Dgx6LxHX0AAivci.jpg (819x1024, 238.3K)

The cost would greatly outweigh the benefit, for one. It would be a pyrrhic victory.

I am the most intellectual, cultured, intelligent and analytical person in all of Any Forums

My opinion is that China will most likely not invade Taiwan during Pelosi's visit and China will not be able to do anything to prevent Pelosi's arrival.

But this will have consequences and China will adopt a more aggressive economic, military and diplomatic policy against Taiwan and the United States.

Attached: 1657425545149.gif (362x425, 30.46K)

>Is China really going to invade Taiwan during Pelosi's visit?
Kek, no. They will cope and seethe as usual and make excuses for why they can’t invade.

It’s been over 70 years since China began threatening invasions. Chances are nothing will happen.
>Muh Chinese superpower!
>Muh Chinese century!
That shit was over before it even started. Back to goldberg’s factories, changs. Those trans flags won’t make themselves.

But there are too much to gain. CCP's legitimacy rely entirely on unifying China, I don't think you people understand this.
Taking back Taiwan=another 1000 year reign for the CCP.

Taiwan is part of China. You're going to have to cope.

This pretending is too risky.
Under this circumstances, it’d be weird as shit if a war broke out and the US intervened and sided with a country whose independence Americans aren’t even approve of.
You and Americans have to admit Taiwan is not China at some point in the future

And you dont seem to understand. An open war with the US would absolutely devastate China. We (the US) would need another 12 years of biden tier policies and possibly an active internal conflict for china to even consider the cost worth it. Bugmen have done the math or they would have tried it already.

>But there are too much to gain.
Dude, Taiwan only matters because it has lots of very hi-tech and one of the kind silicon factories. It's that simple, that's the only reason why both China and the US want full control over it.
The US are losing their grip there, they got like 2 years till the new government changes the course and start the integraton process.
All that "ligitimacy" and "values" is BS, it's all about $$$.

Attached: 1658241398330996.jpg (720x722, 47.67K)

Ivan is right. Ukraine is just money laundering and secret hiding. Taiwan is a much more important chess piece on the world stage due to the tech they export.

No. All fields

>An open war with the US would absolutely devastate China.
That would imply US is sure to get involved, and judging from recent events and Crimea a few years ago, I wouldnt be too sure about it. It's also a cost-benefit game for the US.
Even if US would join the war, China has the ability to deter within the range of its missile army.

>An open war with the US would absolutely devastate China.
Well even the rather minor proxy war between China and the US waged in Taiwan would ruin the US economy. The US economy relies heavly on selling IP and services, I already mentioned tha fabless companies like AMD & NVIDIA aka the biggest players when it comes to graphic cards.
Taiwan plays both sides (the US + China), just check the exports/imports and balance of trade.

Everyone knows that, but also nobody wants to risk war. Like, war is no fucking joke.

The US would absolutely get involved. They couldnt afford not to. Our industries depend too heavily on the bullshit from taiwan and could not allow for wumao spy crap to be put into it. Nor could any other western country that depends on that stuff.

Some say that companies like BlackRock & similar multinational companies managed to buy lots of fertile lands in Ukraine (I heard a quote that they bought more lands than the area of Italy).
The amount of investments and spend money is extremely high and the ongoing war could bring these globalist companies to bankrupcy.
I guess one of the solutions is to prolong the conflict in Ukraine to launder and ciphon enough $$$ to balance the losses.

This, taiwan bro knows

>This pretending is too risky.

It is the only thing that has prevented China from invading Taiwan so far and as long as it works, things will continue to be that way.

This is called "policy of deliberate ambiguity" and it is a political and military strategy used by many countries and peoples throughout history.

The chip stuff is a big deal, but more important is Taiwan's geographic position. If China grabs Taiwan, then it can successfully threaten Okinawa (which the Chinese believe is not Japanese) and everything else around it. China is expansionist (like Russia), it's not just about computer chips, it's about geopolitics, gaining military advantage, and hegemony.