Chomsky says 'The GOP is not a political party, it's a radical insurgency'

Is he right?

"In the last 30 or 40 years...the Republican Party has simply drifted off the spectrum. It's not a political party in the traditional sense," Chomsky said in a recent broadcast of the Al Jazeera network's news discussion program UpFront.

The party has since become "a radical insurgency that has abandoned any interest in participation in parliamentary politics," Chomsky said. He took the phrase from the 2013 book It's Even Worse Than It Looks, written by Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein, two leading political analysts for the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

The party's drift toward this position began with the use of the "Southern Strategy" in the 1960s era, Chomsky said, when the Republican party started using cultural issues, like garnering popular support from white supremacists while passing legislation that favored corporate power and private wealth.

During the last two Democratic presidencies, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell has said that his party's main goal has been to ensure that Democrats cannot achieve anything to "make sure that the country is unrecoverable, and then the blame can be put on the Democrats who happen to have power," Chomsky said. "Republicans can come back into office doing exactly the same thing now."

"That's not a political party," Chomsky said. "That's a radical insurgency. No interest in democracy."

"There are hundreds of bills and state legislatures—Republican ones—working on various ways to ensure that they can become a permanent dominant minority party by excluding the votes of the wrong kind of people," Chomsky added, noting that Republicans have introduced at least 262 bills in 41 states to interfere with elections.

newsweek.com/noam-chomsky-says-gop-not-political-party-radical-insurgency-1677041

Attached: images.jpg (300x168, 9.78K)

Ol' Chomy is a withered old blowhard that should have been shipped off to either Cuba or Venezuela decades go to work in some dark, dangerous mine.

When you vote for the GOP or anything rightwing, you're voting for a political movement that you know, economically, is going to fuck you over. And subject you to tyrannical govt authority. And hurt you and your family while enriching billionaire capitalists

So why would anyone do that? The only reason is hatred for others. Because they hope that the GOP will hurt others more than they hurt themselves

So cutting welfare? Well, that might hurt you and your family just so some billionaires can save on their taxes. But whites calculate that it will hurt "the niggers" worse. So they do it

Same goes for voting against universal healthcare

You hate women? Vote for the GOP to control them
You hate gays? Vote for the GOP to break up their marriages and otherwise torment them

Anything you hate, they use it to get you to vote against your own economic interests. In this way, the wheel of capitalism keep turning. Billionaires get richer. Everyone else gets poorer. This is what Nixon, Reagan, Bushes, MAGA are all about

So you take that and ask yourself, "are they extremists"? Answer is obvious. Yes

>decades go

Sorry, "decades ago" I was trying to type fast to get a post done before the thread was pruned for lack of participation due to uninteresting subject matter and a mile high wall of Marxist text.

Chomsky is a crypto-commie grifter and has been doing the same schtick for 40 years.

Everybody knows he's a crypto-commie grifter and nobody can stand him on the left or the right.

More like Al Jasneedra

> Beware of Anti-White PsyOp (psychological operations) agents/posters shilling a false narrative (usually posting something that denigrates or intends to cause harm to Whites).

> These people will post threads and may also pretend to interact within a thread, again in a manner to cause harm to Whites.

> Popular topics include: BBC, White Replacement, White Genocide, BNWO, Interbreeding, Cuckolding, Insults, Demoralization, Trying to cause division among Whites, Trying to confuse Whites.

> Other topics include: Shilling for progressive/liberal agenda, Attempting to keep White men away from black women, Trying to make it seem normal for White women to date outside their race.

> They want White Men to remain passive or they want White Men to leave the country.

> “Racism” and “racists” are new concepts, “racism” being introduced in 1902 and not becoming popular until 1930s, designed to weaken the Whites and empower blacks. It’s as if someone wanted you to stop breathing so they called you a “breathist” and tried to make you feel guilty about breathing. Same thing with “racist.” They don’t want you to use your natural ability of discrimination because blacks cannot compete, and this allows them to victimize you without fear of retaliation.

> Learn about what’s really going on:

> START HERE
Necessary nigger information [massive amount of useful info]
Niggers without camouflage [rare glimpse at reality]
Victims of black hatred. [don’t let this continue]
> Most people don’t know what’s happening, so please help to spread awareness!

Attached: 1636998282673.png (478x475, 485.9K)

>nd subject you to tyrannical govt authority.
By the way, this is the correct terminology. All capitalism is corrupt, tyrannical govt authority. It's disgusting how that rhetoric has been recently taken over and co-opted by lolberts on the right who absolutely do not care about "freedumb" one bit. And explicitly are the side of corrupt tyranny and authority. 100% that is what the right is

>democracy is about a one party rule forever!
no,also if you hate the U.S. then just leave to a better place.

can this old kike die already