Is true Communism/Socialism racist?

At the time Socialism and Communism were invented the demographic was inherently white.
Take Irish socialism for example, in the 70s it was a white population fighting for socialism. That meant for white Irish at the time. Now it has been changed to mean that shitskins and such are included in that form of socialism.
Socialism that people have fought for since the 30s has now been changed over time to include blacks. But at the time classical socialism/communism would be more akin to NatSoc by todays standards??

Attached: GG01433.jpg (476x555, 182.99K)

I believe that Whites can beat liberals by going communist. Liberals have no defense against communism, and communists are allowed to commit genocide.

The ''communism'' in the Republican movement were always internationalists. The collective unity you speak of came from the church and social conservativism. What you don't understand is that ''socialism'' can also be right wing. You think that socialism is specifically communism when this isn't the case.
Communism is a tool for capitalists.

Even though Karl Marx was a jew, he didn’t like niggers and I’m pretty sure he would not have approved of Germany being overrun by hordes of sandniggers and shits. Internationalism doesn’t mean we should all live in one place, it means that we should support fair treatment of working people in other countries. If not for the wealth disparity between the West and developing world, kikes wouldn’t have anywhere to move their manufacturing to and we’d still have a bunch of good jobs here, and more importantly we would be independent by producing everything we need domestically. Likewise, if developing countries weren’t hopeless stagnant shitholes where people are stuck working dead end shitjobs in sweatshops for pennies, the shits and poos wouldn’t be trying to reverse colonize us so hard. But just an fyi, the USSR was definitely not “white”. There were fuckloads of exotic shits and poos.

>Fuckloads of exotics
Explain, please. As far as I'm aware they were borderline NatSoc. Barring the Asian part of the USSR

All bullshit. The Soviets never focused on race. It just happens to be that eastern slavs were the most successful. This is true where ever white people live.
''Stalinism'' and national socialism are nothing alike.

It's CPC btw, (Communist party of China). For some reason ignorant westoids call it CCP. Now it's CCCP for some stupid reason apparently.

Attached: Xi uber alles.jpg (957x928, 379.89K)

It's not racist
It's more like everyone works in their own country and they trade/help each other

Dumbfuck, the "liberal" "defense" against what you're calling "Communism" is neocon Trotskyism.

God bless Stalin for icepicking that retard before he spoke in front of US Congress.

What about the space race. It was all purely built around the Russians and they were proud to be muh Ruskies.

Maybe they didn't focus on race because they didn't need to. At that time immigration wasn't a problem for them and CCCP was full blown Russian. Yes, they did support blacks but it was blacks who stayed in their own country and blacks of America. They weren't full scale ooen border for shitskins. Or maybe that's my view

>CCCP
Russian Communist Party in Russian, lol

all commies are racist. they are physically weak nerds afraid of blacks. they pretend otherwise, since they think they can persuade blacks to fight for them against the normies, like the brainlet workers did during the russian revolution.

Soviet technology was always german or western. I'd make an exception for a handful of eastern slav engineering.
The Soviets moved different people from different area's all over the regime. Stalin brought about the end of expanding but, the regime was so bad that they couldn't take immigration. A communist economy is a tool for capitalists. They create a closed market which can drive up value for open markets.

Also ''racism'' is basically a modern jew politics. It wasn't a thing prior the 1940s.

Well it was.

America banned Italians and Irish immigration in the 1920s in favour of Anglo-Saxon and Northern Europeans. There's a few books written by anglos proclaiming the superiority over the races of Europe. This is as far back as the mid 19th Century.

Source book
>The Passing of the Great Race

This wasn't based on ethnicity. It was mostly based on politics and group behaviour.
Ethnically speaking most western Europeans are the same, especially those on the British isles. If it was about superior races as you're claiming they wouldn't have discriminated against the germans.

It is based on ethnicity. The book from the 1910s proclaims Nordic superiors and has charts showing the origins of Nordics.

Germans were always welcome ro the U.S

The provos were not fighting for socialism you fucking retard. Some faggy group with almost no members that also called themselves the IRA thought they’d get working class British and Irish in Northern Ireland to rise up against capitalism and the rest of the Irish said fuck this faggot shit we just want the British out.

What ethnic differences is there between all the different groups of people on the British isles?

The germans weren't always welcome especially during ww1.

Are Finnish uralic nords?

>Ethnic differences
Sub-races of the white race. White is the race and there is sub-races to that, if you agree or not. Culturally the Celts are different from Saxons, i.e, language, race... Etc

Depends, lot's of Finns and East Germans were invaded by the Mongols. 23 and me results pending........

Socialism is great, as long as it's national.

Attached: stali.gif (220x225, 70.56K)