Plenty of threads tonight about flat earth and whatnot. Pretty obvious that jews use this to distract people. Brainlets take the bait and argue for ridiculous bullshit (without having put any effort into studying the questions at hand.
I'm here to help. AMA about your schizo physics "ideas".
>fail >phd Lmao, you think you're getting anywhere in academia?
Benjamin Hall
Physics has stagnated since the 70s. Universities became more concerned about making money than birthing the next generation of physicists and now an ape in a suit regurgitating text books is the pinnacle of the field. Why are you surprised that the rest of us have discarded the mainstream opinions?
Alexander Brooks
Quantum mechanics is still determinism, there probably is something that we currently call a graviton, and our universe existed at a low energy state that 13.8 billion years ago
Nicholas Cooper
This thread will be energetic, I promise.
Gavin Thompson
It doesn't take different times to fly east or west. Earth is flat and stationary.
News came out that the vaxx is hogwash, so slide threads. Flat eart isn’t political these threads should be pruned.
Kevin Powell
Landed a teaching job at a medium-sized university, my research is cheap so I can self-fund whenever state grants don't pan out. So basically I get ~$65K/yr to sit around futzing with experiments and teaching intro physics classes.
Shit's great, building a new CAP jet this summer.
Noah Scott
"Physics has stagnated" what an empty phrase. Black holes have been confirmed since the 70s, we've made circuits so small that electrons jump the gaps, quantum computing has begun, the standard model is being refined by the year, and fusion power is in the horizon. Your general statement doesn't make sense.
Grayson Myers
9/11 - remember to show your work
Robert Gutierrez
>Physics has stagnated since the 70s. Universities became more concerned about making money than birthing the next generation of physicists and now an ape in a suit regurgitating text books is the pinnacle of the field. Why are you surprised that the rest of us have discarded the mainstream opinions? It has stagnated. Agreed. That doesn't mean that brainlets who haven't spent any time studying physics (doing the work, not watching youtube vids) help themselves or others by repeating flat earth and/or Tesla garbage. >Quantum mechanics is still determinism, there probably is something that we currently call a graviton, and our universe existed at a low energy state that 13.8 billion years ago This isn't a question, but: 1) no 2) like you know the implications lol 3) you're out of your element, Donnie. You probably mean entropy, but I stretch "mean", here, because you're a low effort brainlet.
Isaac Perez
All fake hype bullshit
Jeremiah Jones
OP, how far away is the hermaphrodite super-menace?
Owen Lee
>It doesn't take different times to fly east or west. Earth is flat and stationary. What does your first claim have to do with your second? Show us the math.
Jack Nelson
Black holes tongue my anus Quantum computing is fake and gay Standard model is illegitimate nonsense Fusion power has been on the horizon for almost 70 years now However, I will admit the circuits we have today are pretty awesome.
Cameron Ramirez
>"Physics has stagnated" what an empty phrase. Black holes have been confirmed since the 70s Science doesn't confirm things >we've made circuits so small that electrons jump the gaps That's engineering based upon QM >quantum computing has begun Has it? If so, still just engineering. Old physics. >the standard model is being refined by the year lel. >fusion power is in the horizon More engineering.
>Your general statement doesn't make sense. You're an "I fucking love science" type who hasn't put any real effort into physics.
Charles Butler
Can you explain what's goin on in that equation?
Parker Bennett
Physics hasn't stagnated, it's just become more specialized. All the low-hanging fruits of physics have been picked and in order to push the envelop further you end up having to focus a lot more on one particular area instead of being an effective jack-of-all-fields. Technological developments become similarly specialized which means all of the implications of a new technique or piece of hardware usually aren't as obvious right off the bat.
Take UV LEDs for example: They were successfully demonstrated about 20 years ago, but only really became affordable(ish) within the last 10 years, and it's only now that people realize their potential that we're seeing commercial applications: UV mircoscopy sources, decontamination lights, etc.
Joshua Mitchell
Apply the Hamiltonian operator (a legacy from classical physics) to a wavefunction and you'll get the time evolution of said wavefunction along with a factor of i and a factor of hbar. The Hamiltonian, itself, is really interesting, even in classical terms. QM leans heavily upon the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations of Newtonian physics. The fact that things like F = ma don't work in QM is a symptom of the underlying idea that a "particle" (as idealized in classical physics) doesn't really exist, only states between measurements do, and thus formulations of mechanics which don't explicitly deal with "motion" between states worked for QM while F = ma did not.
Joshua Perez
Sorry Alex Jones but my physics education comes from a degree, working in research sent to super computers, and lab work 10x longer than you've held any one job. The only time I've seen I fucking love science is here when people start crying about it If you ever looked at any schematics on quantum computers or fusion power, you'd see that not only does it need the new physics of today to work, but thay the designers were all physicists not electrical engineers. If you want to claim there are no giant discoveries of forces and such, then don't say the 70s, just say the 30s when QM was designed and leave it at that.
Kayden Walker
not schizo but i am looking for a description of what i exactly see in the webm ... i know i can look up how a hydrogenbomb works but that doesnt explain what i see there for me ...is it true that in the very beginning the first frame appears it looksl ike the blast just spawned out of nowhere because the radiation is so hot initially that it doesnt glow and when it cools down the blast becomes visible? what is this crispy flacky shit u can see at every hydrogen bomb test? i read it might be the debri of the bomb itself glowing at over 1 million degrees... i am not sure if this is true isnt the fuckin blast multiple kilometers in radius at this point? here is another one what is the little tiny explosion that can be seen ontop of the every hydrogen bombs "dome" at the beginning? there is a castle romeo clip where this blop even seems to radiate blue light in a cone pointing up?
>lel What "new physics" has gone into quantum computing?
Xavier Hughes
Confirmed, refined, begun. Notice how you didn't cite one new discovery, just iterations of shit that was discovered before 1970.
They do this because they can smell a rat. We've been raised on pop sci and Degrasse, Nye and Kaku are just repeating themselves now. Flat earth is bullshit, but so is string theory, and something has to fill the void.
>All the low-hanging fruits of physics have been picked They haven't, we just have a generation of physicists that have been trained to follow instead of lead. All of the vibrancy that was once in physics has now been transferred to IT. Having said that, Stephen Wolfram's batshit ToE is far more interesting than better bulbs.
Jason Powell
>AMA about your schizo physics "ideas". You and all the board fell for many memes and disinfo. Earth is NOT flat, but spherical and exactly at the center of the Universe. Thus, aether exists and the Michelson experiment was badly interpreted. The Jew Einstein lied with Lorentz among others. That's the true redpill.
Besides, Earth is in the middle of the Universe because God put it there. We are "special", there are no extraterrestrial intelligent beings.
Aaron White
>plenty of slide threads >proceeds to post a slide thread Try again glownigger.
Parker Allen
>is it true that in the very beginning the first frame appears it looksl ike the blast just spawned out of nowhere The visible shockwave probably started out moving more rapidly than the frame-rate of the camera could capture. It slows down roughly proportional to the square(ish? probably more) of the radius (distance from origin), as the energy is dissipated in 3d (with a 2d surface of "flux"). >what is this crispy flacky shit u can see at every hydrogen bomb test? i read it might be the debri of the bomb itself Probably the bomb debris along with other random stuff. Mostly other stuff because the bomb is tiny relative to that flash. >here is another one what is the little tiny explosion that can be seen ontop of the every hydrogen bombs "dome" at the beginning? there is a castle romeo clip where this blop even seems to radiate blue light in a cone pointing up? Maybe a primer? Probably not. Link a vid and I'll try to make a better guess.
David Diaz
How do you feel about the job market not rewarding any new research? The best way to make money right now seems to be to just go and copy paste apply stuff. For instance becoming a quant, doing software development, or planning a building as an EE.