You're absolutely insane if you chose anything other than B

agreed
B already paid for the flute
if C provided the labour without a contract establishing a degree of recompense, that's C's fault
the flute belongs to B

A can fuck right off

Found the faggot who wants to stick a flute up his pee hole

A. Fascism aristitotlian
B. Meritocracy
C. Communism/socialism

If you pick a. Or c. You're 13. If you picked B. You're retarded. There is no right answer

keep it for myself of course

If Child A knew how to play a flute she would already have a flute and not need to fight over one

This is a pretty retarded scenario. Did child b hire child c to build the flute just to put on display or something? What should really happen is child b should sell the flute to child a and pay child c for the labor.

they all have good points
luckily I dont fucking care

Natural law. The flute belongs to whoever has it in their hand. FIGHT!

the flute broke nigga and now nobody can hear beautiful flute music they can only hear Child B and C faggots go "TOOTY TOOT TOOT TOOT I'M A ARTIST NOW"

Not enough info to answer

Sage

C if he didn't get paid by B. Otherwise always B

Well B is obviously the one who owns it. Though if he had a monopoly on flute production and was fixing prices, I would argue that it's government's role to interfere. But any answer other than B is clearly madness.

Child B should own the flute and rent it out at a fair market rate to child A.

Attached: 77917E62-F647-457D-BDC6-D2284C3F8E5D.jpg (800x1133, 202.55K)

I'm an utilitarist, what's the point of giving a flute to someone if he/she's not able to use it ?
Also, currency are spooks.

Child A is my answer

B pays C 1/4 of the price she sells it to A for

there is an image of child B using the flute as a dildo good luck finding it

ART FASCISM IS THE FUTURE ALL WILL BOW BEFORE THE ULTRAVIOLENT CREATIVE MASTERS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES WHO THE A.I. WILL WORSHIP

SCREENCAP THIS

B lets A use the flute under contract. B has A tell concert goers where she got the amazing flute. B pays A to make more flutes.

He's clearly white, hence not an inmate, B paid him a fair market price for his labour, provided materials and equipment for flute production.

But child C doesn't want money, he wants the flute

Did child B pay for child C work an amount that was agreed by both parties before the flute was made?
If so, then absolutely for child B. If not, B and C should share for it was a joint venture

>if she had a monopoly on flute production and was fixing prices, I would argue that it's government's role to interfere
if she has a monopoly on flute production it's fair to say the government has already interfered

C needs to get up off his ass and get his own resources then

My flute now! Tough break kids.

B and C share it and force A to teach them how to play it at gunpoint after which they dispose of her

Child A should get the flute. Child C should be compensated for his labor which resulted in the creation of the flute. Child B should be compensated as well if she invested actual labor in harvesting the materials that were necessary for the creation of the flute; any financial investment on her part is irrelevant as investment carries inherent risk.

The only obvious answer is A. Everyone has a place in the world and child A should be grateful to B and C, but as she's the only one who can make music with it, the flute should go to her.

A is the correct answer, manifest destiny bitch.

>flute

The premise is still stupid

No one gives a shit

Change flute to child bride or food

A until B and C figure out how to share nicely

Child C made the fruit so its literally his flute.

I'd give it to whoever plays my flute better

What is the point on working or risking capital if you cannot keep the value you produced? That's a very short sight indeed mr utilitarian

B is jewish, like paying the cast of LoTR shit money the first few movies and not giving them more once they became a hit because the jewish producer "paid for it all". You give it to A. Child C is the fat bitch you see working at taco bell "I will now eat this because without my master craftmanship it would not exist".

Just break it into three parts, the flute if for fags anyway

>there is no right answer
then don't answer and kys, like the fence sitting retard you are

The flute should go to a BIPOC child

has you answer changed now anons?

Attached: Capture.jpg (1199x895, 114.91K)

B already paid for it
if C didn't contractually negotiate recompense for labour with B, then C worked for free like an idiot
still belongs to B

Lol, NO. There are competing oil companies, there are competing phone companies, etc... Without that your phone bill would've been x20

B should pay A and then sell it to C for a reasonable profit.

Why the hell do I have the flute anyway?

Attached: Bastiat - Socialism.jpg (720x720, 67.96K)

no, you are a commie.
If I have a piano, it's mine, even if I don't know how to play it

Receiving services within a functioning society, mr. nigger

>who would you g8ve it to
This is the true autism test
Why do I have it?
If B bought it, it belongs to her. But if I'm the music teacher or something and the little twerp is just some sort of fundy or something fuck you I'm giving it to A. Obviously Im not giving it to C, he's just some runt from shop class but his teacher told him several times the finished assignments would be given to band.

faggot edited the picture to make everyone agree with him.

we're talking specifically about flute production, user
you explain to me exactly how somebody obtains a monopoly on flute production without government intervention

I don't know, the three of them are hot.

Can I gang rape A, B and C?

I take the flute from them and send them all to stand in the corner. Stupid children bickering over nonsense.

Attached: pol-4.gif (500x375, 371.33K)

B paid for the flute. It’s hers.

Child a is the only one that can play it the other two retards don’t deserve the flute there is no other answer

>Who would you give it to?

I'll take it for myself. The weak should fear the strong.

Attached: gigachad.jpg (1068x601, 56.31K)

What did B and C agree on beforehand? Did C seriously put in all that effort without negotiating beforehand his payment?

Child A should have a flute. But not this shitty black-produced one. They should be issued a nice white-made one, the one that doesn't smell.

you have to use the flute, you cannot use your member for penetration

Found the jew

C should be paid by B, A should rent/buy/bottow from B if she wants to make use of the flute.

CHILD B AND CHILD C ARE WHY WE DON'T HAVE _ANY_ GOOD VIDEO GAMES

Obviously there's no prior agreement, contract or pay b->c or else there's no question who owns the flute. That means B GAVE C the materials. No rental, no takebacks, no "oh it's cool now I want it back".

A is a little commie cunt and should be thrown out of a helicopter if she doesn't take a job playing a flute at the cathouse. B should get an agreement next time, or actually fucking PAY for the labor.

Well sure. If we're talking about FLUTE PRODUCTION specifically... flute production by KIDS... some of whom are business owners apparently...

Property and value (as modern concepts derivated from capitalism and the neolithic revolution) are spooks, there's no such things in hunter-gatherer societies and social animals societies (whether they're nomadic hordes or hive-mind colonies) so don't don't care

Attached: hornet-4.jpg (1600x900, 252.46K)

i keep the flute

Child A pays Child B for the flute. Child B pays Child C for making the flute while keeping a small profit. Not really a dilemma unless you're a commie.

Trick question. Niggers have neither money not work ethic.

you're the one who raised the topic of a monopoly on flute production, user

The correct answer has always been to chop it into 3 equal sized pieces.

>nigger
>building anything
fake and gay

C.
B gives money and materials to C but does not establish ownership on the final product (otherwise there wouldn't be a conflict). Since the flute is produced by X he is the only and last person to have ever owned the flute. It's his flute.
If you disagree you're a female (incapable of logic)

THIS. Well done, user.

Child c is a commie faggot child b is the jew that is complaining about the jewish capital she invested in it. Child A is the Aryan artist that can use the flute better then the other subhumans it is her destiny. The jewish answer would be child b.

dream on lula voter, that's how you get a gibs based economy where no one wants to work

You decide this BEFORE making the flute.

I break the flute into three separate pieces and tell them "Now nobody is happy." Then I fucking 360 and moonwalk away as everyone claps.

Attached: 1656039062445m.jpg (1024x981, 107.67K)

meant C, not X

Child C is a lying FUCK, I want him to die

what about the labor of the people before him lnthe supply chain? He think basic material harvest themselves? And the transport? And the people who make the transport possible?

Everyone contributed. It's not just one kid's labor, DUMB FUCK

Every single person involved got paid for their contribution... You accepted that pay, and now want to keep the flute too?

Just what the fuck is wrong with you you little shit?

Triple jabbed dumbass

Did B pay for it or not? You follow the agreement set down between B and C.
Also A is retarded, and how would she even know how to play a flute without already owning one.

A is the textbook definition of "to each accord to his needs", user
you're a commie

>i declare an answer without all the information despite clearly saying "IF" in my logic
brain damage.

>paid him a fair market price for his labour

no such thing. All that matters is that B was paid the amount they both agreed to before the work began.

I choose D, sell the flute to WalMart.

Based. I beat my kids as well, not to teach them any lessons of respect for authority. I simply do it because it is really fun, and super easy. I'm basically like king kong to a little kid.

obviously A. B and C should be punished for wasting time making something they didnt need for no pay

The obvious answer is B. I don't understand how you could arrive at any other answer of ownership.

It's B and C relative to their contributions. This is only an issue because a flute isn't divisible.

B, but should suck C's dick as payment for the labor

That would put child C at a disadvantage during negotiations, child C should be given a medal for being able to convince B the hand over materials without an agreement like a retard.

if C received contractually-agreed recompense, it belongs to B
if C failed to negotiate recompense, then he worked for free like an idiot, and it still belongs to B
I regret to inform you my logic is sound and it is you who has brain damage, user

MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS ARE HARAM AND THEY SHOULD ALL BE DISCIPLINED.

Attached: 1457491250444.jpg (229x377, 14.8K)

Least angry greek

Wait, I forgot, they dragged me into this. Chop the flute into 4 useless pieces. I get a share of flute scrap as well.

A should get it because she can make true art with the flute

D: Keep the flute for myself. Cry about it, bitches. =D

>Obviously there's no prior agreement, contract or pay b->c or else there's no question who owns the flute. That means B GAVE C the materials. No rental, no takebacks, no "oh it's cool now I want it back".
Exactly. Congrats for proving that you possess testicles.

B, A is free to buy it from B at a fair price if she wants

It's based on the high likelihood that someone has already cloned a human in secret, and that name is Kid A.

feed all 3 into meat grinder

>C made the fruit
From what? Right, the resources from B. C got his fruit by doing labour in exchange for prior agreed payment. If C didn't agreed on any payment than he worked for free like a retard. The flute could only C's IF C didn't received any agreed payment from B.
It's all about equal exchange you commie nigger.
What does A provides in exchange for the flute? It must a medium of exchange which is either cash, service or labour.
A can exchange service through playing music.
B provides the funding and resources
C provides the labour
Why is that so hard to understand?!
Money is used as a general medium of exchange, that's it.

I meant "in general". I meant that with any production the one who owns the means of productions - owns the final product. Obviously that's what the example is about. So I'm saying that there could be exceptions on that. That sometimes government has to step in, and owning means of production should be illegal in case of monopolies.

Why would you revise it?
Was child C hitting too close to home?

Attached: 35bqa3.png (500x641, 158.96K)

>takes flute and breaks it over his leg
nothing personal kid

if child b put forth money and materials than child c was paid for his services. child b should get the flute

Fuck niggers and browns, whitey gets the flute. Three whites, now that's a trickier question.

This still doesn't work because it doesn't address whether child C was compensated for their labor. Within the frame that OP probably intended though,
Child B- lolbertarian
Child C- commie
Child A is the only one that has any use for the flute in the first place, them having the flute objectively makes the world a better place while the other two is just a dumb reddit argument over the value of labor versus property.