Do you think the Supreme Court agreeing to take on Moore v. Harper is a good or bad thing...

Do you think the Supreme Court agreeing to take on Moore v. Harper is a good or bad thing? It could result in the end of democracy in the US.

If the Supreme Court grants state governments the ability to conduct elections with no oversight, should I move to another country? Would the US still be livable if the Republicans
acquire permanent control of the congress and the presidency? Some experts are saying this could cause civil war.

Attached: ABF6806B-58EF-4F97-A16F-B14D19D62E9B.jpg (1280x720, 86.47K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/ZKiDqoUjiCI
youtu.be/TMcvZaiBwe4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

why should i care

You are repeating talking points from the Atlantic and Vox. Our elections have already been compromised. Would the US still be livable if the Democrats
acquire permanent control of the congress and the presidency?

Republicans literally want what amounts to anarcho capitalism. I’ll take what the democrats are offering.

>Republicans literally want what amounts to anarcho capitalism.
Based if true.
>I'll take what the democrats are offering.
Kill yourself nigger.

States already have no oversight. Observers are sent home, private volunteers run everything with no cameras or any eyes on what happens inside and don't you DARE question its integrity.

What exactly are they offering? Do you even know?

>If the Supreme Court grants state governments the ability to conduct elections with no oversight
They already do that. Biden cheated. Trump won. And yet Biden is in office. We don't have democracy right now.

How is it based? What is the anarcho capitalist solution to automation and climate change?
Yes, their sole goal is to make life as comfortable as possible for the rich and to drive marginalized people to suicide. I was a Republican for 6 years, I know their talking points.

>pandemic lockdowns
>forced experimental vax
>gibs for nigs
>flood of illegals
>gibs for illegals
>criminals let loose to rape and kill
>cities burned down cuz dey dindu nuffin!
>double digit inflation
>sinking employment
>cratering economy
>billions for israel and ukraine
>"I’ll take what the democrats are offering."
kys

>How is it based? What is the anarcho capitalist solution to...climate change?
>WHAT IS THE SOLUTION TO MUH FAKE PROBLEM?
If you are too stupid to see through the climate change propaganda then you don't deserve to vote or voice a political opinion.

>the Supreme Court grants state governments the ability to conduct elections with no oversight, should I move to another country?
Yes.
“independent state legislature” theory. That theory, in brief, holds that the federal constitution gives to state legislatures, and withholds from any other state entity, the power to regulate federal elections. Proponents ground their theory in two provisions of the federal constitution: Article I’s Elections Clause, which provides that “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof,” and Article II’s Presidential Electors Clause, which provides that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” Proponents defend the theory as consistent with the text and structure of the constitution, as well as some nineteenth-century practice.
Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch are correct in trying to uphold the above copy pasta. If you disagree you should absolutely get the fuck out of my country.

Attached: 1658254352459316m.jpg (1024x994, 101.09K)

Because (((they))) don't want state legislators in charge of their states electoral process.

Attached: 165808734740030.jpg (1024x566, 70.19K)

/thread. Don't show up here with liberal propaganda and not expect to get BTFO

Quick summary of the case?

The US isn't intended to be a democracy. The problem is people trying to make us into one.

>elections with no oversight
democrat states are already doing this. what the democrats want is for the fed to move in and govern state elections, turning them into democrat states overnight. every time a state has switched to mail-in voting the democrats have never lost an election after that

That seems pretty clear. What is the counterargument?

I was asking what are the democrats offering bud. You don’t seem to know.

>The end of democracy
>The end of democracy
>The end of democracy


This is the new "orange man bad". It's NPC update 1.82

End it. Christ is king

youtu.be/ZKiDqoUjiCI

Attached: Return to tradition .jpg (720x864, 142.92K)

Beware of the Black Catholic crusader
youtu.be/TMcvZaiBwe4

Attached: Clarence Thomas Catholic .jpg (566x413, 47.67K)

>I was a Republican for 6 years
>admits to being easily manipulated
NGMI

They should Overturn
Lawrence V Texas
Brown v education
Griswold v. Connecticut
Obergefell v. Hodges

And if you disagree get the fuck of Any Forums lefty faggot

There isn't one.
Look up the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
Democrats have been trying to monkeyfuck with the federal elections for years.

Democracy is mob rule. Ending that is a good thing

>I'm literally serious right now guys.
>It's literally the literal end of the fucking world.
>Literally.

Do you know how zoomer tier retarded you sound?