Hohols get in here please

Why won't you HIMARS the Crimean bridge?
I ask this w/o a bit of irony, I'd do it rn if I were you

Attached: _.jpg (3888x2821, 3.39M)

Why don't Russians strike at the bridges on the Dnepr?

Too far probably. Why not strike this shit with Bayraktar kamikaze tho? I would try to bomb Moscow itself personally

No order and coordinates from Pentagon = nothing is being blown up.

Becauses its on rusian teritory and would trigger a full out war

They are needed for the offensive

A Bayraktar would do precisely nothing. You'd need a cruise missile, which the west is pointedly not giving Ukraine.

Naw, P*tin is a paper tiger and scared bitch. He will just scream NOOOO NOT MY CRIMEA

It's not our side whose goal is to destroy the infrastructure

In my past life I was a hohol, does that counts?

Sure it does

if they would blow up the bridge the crimea would even be more pro russian. there is nothing to gain to blow it up

It would be enough to destroy railway line or asphalt and ahut it down for some timee and make vatopropaganda absolutely assmad

except fighters are hiding there than its 50/50

Crimea is already pro-Russian.
The media effect would be unbelievable and these days it became more important than anything.

Which offensive, you are still stuck in Donbass
It is your goal to prevent fresh troops and new equipment and ammo from crossing the Dnepr to reinforce Ukrainians in Donbass, though
>From hohol to peruANO
good lord no

Why not bomb the Kremlin with Tomahawk missiles too?

It is outside the norms of Washington-Moscow proxy wars.

Because Russia would declare war. Oh wait a minute mister

>Why won't you HIMARS the Crimean bridge
Because you will probably HIMARS the Brooklyn Bridge.
Fair is fair.
Please remember it's not the common citizen that's wants war.

Dnepr has several sturdy dam-bridges which are likely very hard to blow up, so why waste missiles on the less sturdy bridges when military trucks will still be able to cross on the sturdy ones

We shouldn't be giving anything to anyone. What's happening between Russia and Ukraine is not our business, although I hope they make peace.
Those in Wash DC will get us all killed.

Attached: kree.jpg (125x125, 3.45K)

>Why won't you HIMARS the Crimean bridge?
If you assume they have the ability to do it but aren't doing it then I think Ukrops goal is to make a counteroffensive and push your south group army into Crimea and only then destroy it, trapping all Russians with no escape route.
Well, if you assume they don't have the ability to do it then it's crystal clear why the bridge still stands lmao

>It's not our side whose goal is to destroy the infrastructure
This is true. Russia knows they will eventually be doing business with Ukraine. Rational.

However if you manage to destroy them then the enemy's supply lines are decisively crippled. It's a trade-off that should be considered at least
Cadornenko's offensive is still a thing?

We'll see in upcoming days, from what Ukrops say it started.

>Ukrops goal is to make a counteroffensive
Has anyone of these ever worked before?

Attached: 1658690440623.jpg (640x640, 48.4K)

they didnt get 300km range ammo for it and even if they did they would have to approach mauriupol a bit in order to get in range

Isn't Azov still holding Mariupol? Unless...