PSYCHOLOGICAL PAEDOPHILE

/Pol, I've had an idea:
We did really well labeling everyone from Disney to the LGBT crowd as Groomers, and they hated it. But big-tech now censor the word, "Groomers" as hate speech. What I propose is we re-brand these people as "Psychological Paedophiles" in that, whilst they don't touch children, they think about the sexuality of children all day long.
The objective here is to meme the phrase "Psychological Paedophile" right into the dictionary and make it sound as scientific as possible so as not to give them anyway to hide from it.
>Thoughts?
>How to go mainstream?
>What should the definition of a Psychological Paedophile be?

Attached: Psychological Paedophile x600.jpg (600x848, 603.38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/6oyG2uK8CdI
youtu.be/EUiB2EH7svk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>think about the sexuality of children all day long
Uh user that's just a pedophile. A person with attractions to pre pubescent children.

its psychological because it is about getting into their heads first, then their bodies.

Right wingers are projecting their pedophilia again, yikes.

Attached: 161209999790.webm (576x1024, 1.11M)

Reminds me of that "virtuous pedophiles" group they tried to peddle, virtuous as in they didn't act on their degenerate urges. This has potential. Good idea Fren

user what the fuck are you talking about? You don't have to ever touch a child to be a pedo.

Georgetown university is where the pedos learn to groom
youtu.be/6oyG2uK8CdI

Attached: Jesuit john.jpg (720x910, 93.26K)

Twiddler is already starting to pick up speed. But maybe this can be a back-up term.

Hunter Biden isn't just jesuit educated, he's faculty.
youtu.be/EUiB2EH7svk

Attached: Jesuit faculty professor Biden.jpg (720x874, 76.47K)

I'm talking about making drag queens too afraid of asking to do story hour for fear of being labelled a "Psychological Paedophile". I want to instill fear in them. I want school teachers to be too afraid of being labelled.

Attached: pedo scum.jpg (259x194, 12.58K)

Georgetown jesuit.edu

Attached: Clinton mkultra jesuit.jpg (716x468, 50.09K)

Just remember: if the leftoids had nothing to hide, they wouldn't go full scorched earth on the accusations of pedophilia.

Attached: 1658687746616633.jpg (1151x1513, 112.12K)

Why are Russians with UK vpns always so obsessed with LGBTQ? Is it because forbidden fruit, they are not allowed to have it in Nazi Russia? They like to fap to it? Their Kremlin bosses insist they post it so they can fap to it?

Utter degeneracy

Attached: 1642201166923.png (495x857, 662.32K)

They don't care and they care less the more you use made up shit to play Among Us: Pedo edition. They're creepy freaks who shouldn't be around kids in a professional or public setting.

Attached: SOYJAK-PEDO.png (800x586, 224.79K)

>Twiddler is already starting to pick up speed.
Groomer gained traction but was shut down by big-tech, Twitter now censor the word. Predditor started to gain traction as is Twiddler, but these are meme words.
I'm thinking about a science-sounding term that they cannot write off as hate speech.

§6301 §647.6
yes but the idea here is to bring to light that these mind games are the troons psychologically toying with the kids.

It is funny that they're having a full-on meltdown over being groomers. Really makes you think. I'm pretty sure Twitter also banned the word too.

Attached: 92782163781.png (785x584, 466.66K)

calling themselves "virtuous" is kinda virtue signaling... like, you didnt rape a child, what do you want, a cookie?

>think about the sexuality of children all day long
>Uh user that's just a pedophile. A person with attractions to pre pubescent children.
Yeah this

We were taking it easy on them by calling them groomers, it was partly a meme that rhymes with boomer

But theyre really pedophiles

Yes, a 40 year old bearded man in a dress shouldn't be reading books about gay sex to kids. And the parents shouldn't be supporting going OHHH SO PROGRESSIVE. STUNNING AND BRAVE.

/Pol
kek fuck you glownigger

>that one on the right

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 14.08K)

33

Attached: k1nf4jk26do31.jpg (1152x648, 313.92K)

>But theyre really pedophiles
Exactly this. My thinking is if you call them a paedophile they'll respond with, "I've never touched a child in my life and you're just name-calling." But if we call them a Psychological Paedophile, with an unhealthy interest in exposing children to adult matters they have no retort.

Disney Club 33

Attached: Screenshot_20220407-142021.png (825x332, 106.83K)

Disney Child Rape

Attached: 1649366201509.jpg (1024x1024, 195.65K)

there should be a movement to persecute people who MAKE the books about gay sex for kids.

That's easy, bong. Don't add extra steps. Here:

>I did not call you a child molester. I called you someone who thinks about it. A pedophile

>there should be a movement to persecute people who MAKE the books about gay sex for kids.
We're it, user.