Prove climate change is a hoax

Hard mode: no arguments like da jews, flat earth, or other schizobabble

Attached: 128-1280582_pepe-nerd-png-download-smart-pepe-transparent-png.png (860x819, 137.21K)

Antarctica used to be green.

water levels

No. You will pay your cabon tax and eat the bugs like the midwit you are.

Attached: Gym.webm (460x460, 1.45M)

Attached: 92306362-9989-4ECE-85A1-24407025B40E.jpg (1024x717, 84.13K)

There is a climate change, but it is not manmade, go see Le Roy Ladurie's works

I'm not very smart, but Crichton was. Him writing this book is good enough for me

Attached: !31234123.jpg (338x500, 32.17K)

The science is settled, climate change is real, its human made and, if not contained, will likely wipe us out.

Attached: climate_scan_consesus-1024x653.jpg (1024x653, 98.4K)

You're telling me a change in the temperature line so small it wouldn't be visible on this graph is caused by the other line that has no causal relationship with temperature? Yeah no, you're the one who needs to prove his stupid hypothesis.

Attached: FMueller_5-768x488.png (768x488, 439.57K)

Climate change is real. This picture explains it.

Attached: regular_vs_rampant.jpg (650x384, 60.66K)

Attached: 1658514723652774.jpg (680x678, 119.78K)

>that
Based

models aren't data

Climate change is real. Man contributes to it. In no way shape or form does anyone have any idea of what it will do or how to stop it , let alone corporate heads like Bill Gates or politicians all of whom will act in their own interest

That's an argument for climate change having happened in the past already, not for climate change happening right now. Discarded.
Those are two words without context. Not an argument. Discarded.
Doctored picture of allegedly published graphs, interspersed with "witty" banter. No meaning inherent. Not an argument. Discarded.
Off topic with respect to the exact phrasing and intended meaning of the original question. Discarded.
>Attempt to reduce a multivariate dynamic system to a bivariate dynamic system and then implying no "visible" correlation exists in a picture with a one-million-year-per-pixel resolution. Troll attempt at best, blatant display of severe mental deficiency at worst. Discarded.

Attached: neo.gif (500x216, 996.58K)

Any Forumscels will say that 97% of scientists are paid by "da jooooos" and that we are wrong. people on this board are legit retarded and will say anything to justify their retarded conspiracy

prove anything i do matters

Plants require co2 to grow and respirate oxygen. The higher levels of co2 in the atmosphere the less water and fertilizer required by the plant to reach the same growth level. Also a single volcano dumps more carbon into the atmosphere than humans produce in a year or some shit.

>Hard mode: no arguments like da jews, flat earth, or other schizobabble
Climate change isn't a hoax. It just isnt man made, it constantly changes and a huge factor is the Earth's magnetic fields.

academia isn't science

Well yeah, if cycles are climate change then I believe it's happened for millions of years. Invest in Antarctica, people.

Sure thing schizo

Attached: 2A73686B-153B-4F98-B476-8F5B24AF60D9.jpg (941x933, 374.47K)

Climate change is not a hoax. Climates change, there is no such thing as "Cliimatopause". Global warming is a hoax, and man made global warming is a bigger hoax.

i didn't know there is an external atmosphere this picture explains nothing except the person who made it didn't know shit