The sky is blue? Are you fucking kidding me? Where is this happening...

>The sky is blue? Are you fucking kidding me? Where is this happening? Show me at least five peer-reviewed studies and three acts of congress that say that. I'll wait.

Why are leftists like this?

Attached: 7af93-16419692317343-1920.jpg (1920x1200, 128.29K)

Hum, actually, it's not blue. There is nothing there to be blue. It's just invisible air; you can't see it.
It's just that all of the air particles filters a bit of the sun's light, making it appear bluer once it goes trough the atmosphere.

Checkmate, science wins again!

leftists lack the life experience to be able to make generalizations and need somebody to tell them what to think because their own observations are worthless or nonexistent

Incapability of independent thought.

So it's blue.

>Why are leftists like this?

Attached: sauce.png (1080x2160, 431.05K)

The rabbi needs to bless the argument as kosher or else it is unclean.

>experts weigh in

Just went outside and looked up. It's blue.

on the face of it, it's because they believe this is what an 'intellectual' does, only ever consults sources and peer-reviewed papers so therefore what they are saying is factual and 'the science'
but that's just a cover, it's a tactic so they can deny anything they don't want to accept is true aka; anything that disagrees with their insane worldview.
you can make any claim to them, and if they don't like it, they scream SOURCE?!
if you can't immediately provide one, they declare it false, no matter how obvious it is, such as there are only men and women and you can't change from one to the other
but if you provide a source, they then declare the source invalid for any arbitrary reason: "Oh, you're using a source from xxx place? Heh, didn't you know that's right-wing nazi propaganda? Dismissed!"
thus creating an unfalsifiable worldview, while maintaining this self-delusion that they are smart, academic, and only follow 'the science', while also feeling entirely justified in just dismissing anything they don't agree with

I debate on left wing forums and I constantly have to pull like 9 citations and these dipshits just sit there and get spoonfed. Some of them are absolute retards that don't even Google stuff before they assert it so I'll just Google it for them.

Attached: FToI1n-X0AI-C6U.jpg (1500x1130, 275.75K)

Because leftism is a death cult and (((scientists))) are their priests, anything that isn't accepted dogma of the death cult has to be rejected or proven otherwise by their priest class who are mostly leftist activists themselves nowdays

How do you not get banned?

>debating people who are incapable of deductive reasoning
Might aswel try to demolish mountains without any tools

Attached: 1658618460646751.jpg (1024x1024, 163.05K)

He is a totally annoying faggot on every possible timeline which is impressive.

You just affirmed that’s it’s blue faggot

Hum, actually, the coulour blue is a social construct. We call blue things that appear as blue to us. This means that the sky is indeed blue, since it appears blue.

>But the sky isn't a thing it doesn't exist! It's just air!

The word "sky" is a social construct referring to the upper atmosphere of the Earth, the air structure which prevents us from seeing space at large during the day by blocking electromagnetic radiation from the visible spectrum

nigger chink ricedick

>Mutt

So...... The sky is blue is what you are saying