I fucking love capitalism

What's the CEO's ethnicity and BoD's racial makeup?

gee, it's almost like making 99% of your population poor and angry is going to have violent, murderous consequences. plan accordingly.

what are you talking about user? that 19 year old that puts scoops of beans on a tortilla should be making a living wage. at least $60,000 a year. they even ask you what kind of meat and salsa you want then they put it on the burrito too.

Capitalism has room for a maximum wage instead of a minimum one...

It's not capitalism
It's existence
Cancel existence

Who is forced to work at Chipotle?

Yes so do I. Glad we agree on something at least faggot

The market decides bro
And the market says millions of people are more interested in shit mexican food than fair wages for fast food workers
its kind of like democracy but with less effort and more tacos

Attached: 1615729551585.png (666x666, 223.24K)

While I respect and admire unions that actually do something to improve labor I wouldn't join a union for what's essentially a job for teens and young adults who are in college or need an extra job to pay bills or earn extra money

Attached: fubuki azuma pointless.png (703x599, 145.23K)

Chipotle employees 97,660 people. They pay them $1.279 billion. So a $24 million raise is 1.9% of what they pay the rest of their workers. If you were to divide it up amongst all the employees then they'd get an extra ~$246 a year but the company would have no CEO actually running it and it would go under very quickly. So those 97,660 people would end up unemployed

It's not a failure of capitalism. It's a failure of the average person to understand basic math

>Waahhh, look at these people getting raises!!!
So? It's their fucking company, if they hadn't made the initial investment then you wouldn't have a place to work you stupid long-haired sissy faggot.

There are no trad hyper-capitalists. The very wealthy are funding Marxist causes in order to keep working people divided and bickering while they run off with all the money.
Entrepreneurial capitalism, which is what you're thinking of when you think of "capitalism", doesn't exist any longer. It has been replaced with managerialism.

youtube.com/watch?v=BM5STDnjqvw

Attached: 1593209506822.png (1024x640, 961.71K)

So, because most people don't win at capitalism, they are, by your definition, "retarded". But to be retarded is to fail to meet certain developmental benchmarks, e.g.: your "progress" along a hypothetical developmental timeline is less than that of your peers, hence "retarded". If the opposite were true, then "most people" would extract profit from an enterprise, which would quickly exhaust any surplus produced, which would destroy profit, which would be the end of capitalism. So, clearly, that can't be the case.

Sooo... By combining the two propositions ("only retards fail at capitalism" + "retards are people who don't meet intellectual/developmental benchmarks"), we can confidently state that "Most people don't mean the developmental definition of normal". But then if that's the case, if even 50.0001% of people don't meet your definition of "developmentally normal ", then how can your normal be normal? How can we adopt a definition of normal that doesn't apply to the majority of people? It's literally self-defeating.

It's manifestly true that plenty of retards do just fine with capitalism. Where would the Australian economy be without rich retards?

I’ve always wondered why CEO’s make so much money. Like, is it that hard to find an effective person to work for $5 mil per year?

Reminder that Marxism and the popularization of leftism bs is nothing more than a reaction against rich faggots being egoistic like the scum they are. They don't have an ounce of virtue. Liberalism

Success in today's America has little to do with intelligence, talent or hard work.