Any Forums should drop NatSoc as its primary ideology and instead embrace traditionalist conservatism.
Traditionalist Conservatism is superior to National Socialism is every way:
-TradCon has historically been able to deal with Jews but in a much more humane way. Jews were allowed to exist in society given that they would not try to subvert it, in the event that Jews did attempt to subvert the society they would simply be expelled. This not only a lot more human and less retarded solution than NatSoc but also much more efficient as time and resources would not be needed to find and transport millions of people from around county into isolated camps.
-TradCon does not use democracy but instead uses either aristocracy or absolute monarchy. This is better than democracy because the wealthy would not be able to control the politicians but rather would need to obey the monarchy or aristocrats and thus must do what is best for society. It’s also better than dictatorship because it is hereditary so those in power would need to be more responsible in order to maintain the reputation of their families.
-TradCon is neither socialist or capitalism but instead uses distributism as its economic model. This means that people are allowed to accumulate wealth but only to a point where it does not become a detriment to the rest of society. Simply put it means that wealth is spread around so that the rich don’t become too rich and the poor don’t become too poor.
-Final point, In a TradCon society Christian values and ethnic/racial identity are BOTH considered to be important. Those who are NatSoc like to call Christians cucks because some are pro-immigration but with TradCon both racial demographics and Christian values would both be preserved.
Nah fuck that. That isnt superior in any way. The reason that cant work is no matter how many times you tell kikes that they cant subvert society in any negative ways they’ll find some way to do it, and they’ll do it anyways. The only real solution is to get rid of jews, to eradicate them.
Carson Perry
I don’t think most people on here are actually NatSoc but are just being trying to be ironic or edgy because they’re fed up with globohomo
They literally subverting society in the 1800s after capitalism and democracy became widespread. Literally for all of history until then they had zero power and the entire western world was traditional and like 99.999% white.
Levi Barnes
*started subverting
Michael Lee
Based
CHRIST IS KING
Andrew Moore
I really like the idea of traditional conservatism, I just want to be sure the Jews can no longer have their negative influence on society.
Landon Jones
This doesn’t disprove anything I said, they still had virtually no power back then, everything was controlled by the emperor and most wealthy were non-Jewish
>Jews were allowed to exist in society given that they would not try to subvert it, in the event that Jews did attempt to subvert the society they would simply be expelled. This is the problem right here. Repressing and expelling jews is just kicking the can down the road, making it the future generation's problems. Societies will always forget why those subhumans deserve to be hated and they will be allowed back in and given full rights. This is why jews have been expelled from 109 countries yet they are still our biggest problem. Exterminating them is the only real solution, they can never be a problem again if they're extinct.
Christopher Cruz
Uh huh. Tell us again about why jews were "forced" to be bankers, and how they are god's chosen people.
Austin Thomas
This is not true in the present day. now that Israel exists there is a permanent place for them to go, it is basically one big containment zone. Now they literally have no excuse to live in Europe
Jeremiah Jackson
The pic you posted was about the Jews in the Roman Empire, that’s what I was responding to faggot
Hudson Robinson
if you are after monarchy - natsoc is not excluded by definition monarch's character and will decides on policy - structure still being monarchy and again if you are after monarchy - tradcon is not primary ideology, but a part of the system in which monarch can and will have his own preference so tradcon + natsoc are absolutely available and probably to be expected, given that his duty in modernity would be always in part nationalistic and for well being of his own peoples (nat and soc) again I'm not against, I just don't see the point in getting into a fight with natsoc's while their interests are bound into the monarchical structure by default either way
Brandon Harris
no thanks, traditional conservatism is garbage if you actually care about your people and the french revolution and communism were both inevitable because of this
>jews were allowed to exist in society given that they would not try to subvert it
lol..lmao.. tradtional conservatism is literally the reason jews were allowed to get such a foothold over society, you completely pulled this out of your ass
Cooper Flores
Nah bro NatSoc as an ideology is too unhinged. No one wants to live in a totalitarian one-party state, they simply want a leader who will look out for their interests. Plus NatSoc is inherently expansionist which means you will basically be in a constant state of war, killing off millions of your own people. There is a reason NatSoc only last 12 years whereas TradCon lasted 2000+ years.
Aiden Cook
>it's an amerimutt talking about tradition episode
Parker Perez
/thrad
Isaac Moore
>NatSoc is inherently expansionist it was only """inherently"" expansionist because Germany had to rebuild their army from the ground up and lacked raw resources, two very context-specific issues that dont necessarily apply \to every nation
Carter Sanders
Lol what… The French Revolution only happened by Louis XIV was a complete retard who didn’t know how to a country and spent all of France’s money while people were starving, this is the same reason for the Russian Revolution. It has nothing to do with TradCon but rather just grossly incompetent leaders
Henry Garcia
*only happened becuase
Zachary Reed
>TradCon Holy shit even gayer than the TradCath LARP that was being shilled here for awhile
Cameron Gomez
>deal with Jews but in a much more humane way. That's where you lost my attention.
Colton Rogers
What does it say that tradcon societies like France and Russia put supposedly incompetent men (which is a meme, btw, I hate CHristianity and tradcon but Nicholas was actually a cool and competent dude) in charge?
Kayden Baker
That’s not at all why. Hitler said he believed Germany was overpopulated as an excuse to grab more land. He simply that Germanic were superior and that all Slavic lands should belong to them, he did not care about whites he just cared about Germanic people
William Mitchell
I'm actually NatSoc
Nathaniel Diaz
again, I'm not saying that such a thing like NatSoc Monarchy could exist - because monarchy by default is a gov structure of which policies are person-based (that being the sovereign) so if king is of the NatSoc persuasion - you will have a NatSoc policies you like it or not > one-party state no party state wtf some advisory bodies sure, but no parliament that can and will in time make a monarch into a puppet - fuck that gay shit globohomo "let" europe to have under their supervision (UK, skandis, spain etc) Monarchy is one-man rule it's literally in the name and THAT monarchy is the one you point as to rule with stability for thousands of years not this parliamentary puppet show
Reign but not rule my ass fuck that puppet show (uk, skandis, spain etc) no wonder they were "allowed" to remain in the conquest of I+II world wars
Asher Williams
*he simply believed
Alexander Murphy
Conservativism was started by a jew name Disraeli you dumb kike
