Politically speaking, how useful are women to society outside of their abillity have children?
Politically speaking, how useful are women to society outside of their abillity have children?
EPHESIANS 5
22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
1 TIMOTHY 2
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
1 CORINTHIANS 11
7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1 PETER 3
1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
3 Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
4 But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
>how useful are women to society outside of their abillity have children?
They have a use beyond that?
They have a negative utility, they destroy more than they do. They are worse than useless
> Politically speaking, how useful are women to society outside of their abillity have children?
They will vote for whatever gets them the most positive attention and makes them feel accepted.
They are really good at knitting sometimes, sometimes they can cook a good meal but rare nowadays
In any economy that truly goes tits-up, women immediately start whoring themselves for money en masse.
women represent ~80% of all purchase decisions globally. it's why every corporation is the most pathetic groveling feminist cuck you could ever imagine.
Napoleon said Women are factories for making children.
allowing women to vote is arguable the most damaging thing we have done to america in the last 100 years apart from allowing the jews to come here.
Why does such a pretty girl have to ruin her body with a tattoo like that. Disgusting.
As useful as a man is outside of their ability to provide and protect their children.
this!
Yes, we know
I agree with my Moorish brother here
women copy behavior of other women. they are fucking dumb.
That not Jews fault though, it was Northeast Protestant Christians who passed the woman's voting law
Only at face value, my dood.
Superficial feminist = fuck those hoes.
Then they go fuck a MtF tranny, properly.
Can we all trim bonsai trees and just find a way to live in peace please? America has 0.16% of its population maintaining and expanding the electrical grid, and the money they get is walmart fork-lift operating tier. The hardest work competes with Mr."lol I get a 10% commission for selling a house lol"- WHY ARE HOUSES 10% MORE EXPENSIVE, BECAUSE YOU TOLD ME I NEEDED IT? I ALWAYS NEEDED A HOUSE. I WAS ALWAYS GOING TO BUY ONE. I DIDNT NEED YOU JACKING UP THE COST BY 10% BECAUSE YOU "HELPED" ME DECIDE.
ITS A HOUSE. YOU NEED ONE.
Yeah. One needs a house to exist.
Imagine the LiBeRaL wOrLd OrDeR taking a personal objective to quantumly suppressing, demoralizing, stalking, & generally ruining one's life into the ground, for sport. To make an example.
Then what?
They can be very useful for other things. (((Corporations))) love to use him. However, any other use a women may provide necessarily hinders the role of raising children. The failure of commitment to motherhood since the boomers has led to successive failed generations rife with faggortry, mental illness, and pure feebleness. The role of the father is also important: but he represents almost a spiritual role in raising a child. He is a role model, an aspiration: he teaches you skills and respect . It is very possible to have a healthy relationship with a father by just having a few words at dinner as long as the father is consistently there. Not so with a mother: a mother must constantly be there
I have spend over 30 years politely trying to teach my wife how to learn and think. Not what I want her to think or learn but to actively use her own intelligence and experience to formulate predictions, patterns, rational conclusions etc. I'm still trying bros. She did produce two excellent sons for me and I love her very much even after all this time. But men and women have different brain structures. And that's a good thing.
You wear a lot of knit garments? Snuggle up under that afghan blanket?
The suffrage movement was riddled with jews.