Funny how the suicide rate for trannies is rising despite the fact that they are being more accepted in society

funny how the suicide rate for trannies is rising despite the fact that they are being more accepted in society.

Attached: n8kjm5j3ntc91.jpg (563x1000, 58.21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wikidiff.com/amount/rate
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's basic math: if you have more cars, there will be more crashes. But there is no possible way to make cars 100% crashless. So the crash rate will always pile up.

>despite the fact that they are being more accepted
They can still see themselves is a mirror.

Attached: Mike booze.jpg (636x510, 33.84K)

>funny how the suicide rate for trannies is rising
the tranniecide is real

They are forced on society but not actually accepted.

> they are being more accepted in society.
No real person accepts these nasty freaks. Kill yourself faggot. Sage.

>i dont know what the word "rate" means
you are the mentally ill guy with the CR flag who was in the SSRI threads yesterday arent you.

>Trannies are so mentally ill that if you mention their birthname they have a mental breakdown
>They are so mentally ill that if they see their own reflection, they have a mental breakdown
The most fucked up thing is that modern leftist society encourages transgenders, and as such encourages their mental illness. These people are not getting better by transitioning, and one day they wake up and realise this fact, and that's when the world starts crumbling around them.

Rate:
a measure, quantity, or frequency, typically one measured against some other quantity or measure.

Crash rate: how frequently cars crash.

Example: The average car crash rate for this month has increased a 10% since the last month

Care to explain why is the term used incorrectly in this context? I'd like to learn proper english, thanks.

Perhaps it coul've been better to type "The amount of car crashes will always pile up"?

wikidiff.com/amount/rate

It’s because people are reaffirming delusional thinking and eventually reality sets in that they can’t actually be a woman or man.

they'll never be a real MAN or WOMAN period.
> a real VAGINA
> a real DICK

the grass isn't greener on the other side.
they're just MUTATED

Attached: the-grass-is-much-greener-on-other-side-picture-id182235917.jpg (974x679, 537.16K)

also you claimed that I don't know what the word means , which I clearly do. What I wasn't so sure is how to use it in context when compared to the term "amount". So that basically makes you categorically wrong? I can also be an insufferable smartass.

Attached: Big Brain Post.jpg (453x447, 49.75K)

rate is a percentage. if the tranicide rate has increased from 41% to 50%, that is not due to an increase in trannies. if the rate was still 41% but there were more trannies in total, then yes, the NUMBER of trannicides would be higher due to the increase in trannies. But rate is a percentage in this context.
like the definition you typed, a quantity measured against some other quantity. so number of tranicides, measured against the total number of trhannies.

everyone knows what a rate is, CR fag is just being disingenuous and intentionally misinterpreting

>if the tranicide rate has increased from 41% to 50%, that is not due to an increase in trannies
how can you tell? there are many scenarios: lesser trannies and more suicides, more trannies and lesser suicides. Anyways

Pretty sure I can still measure the number of car crashes, against the total number of car crashes last month, the word "rate" still fits.

Are we really discussing petty semantics and word ontology?

Attached: PilpulFiction.jpg (319x450, 64.41K)

no, my comments are completely relevant. the op said the trannicide rate has gone up. first reply said "of course it would if the number of trannies has increased". Wrong. OP was talking about the rate, not the simple number of them.

>just being disingenuous and intentionally misinterpreting
maybe I'm ignorant or confused you asshole? that's why I'm asking. But so far it seems I used the term right.

>INB4 but actually, the sky is not blue, the sky is colorless but reflects the sea, so stop intentionally being disingenuous by calling the sky blue

Can we start calling them Pizza Huts?

Attached: 1657877456111.jpg (1139x961, 809.07K)

Attached: 704258DC-0F3A-4E1B-AE7C-AB8A5B9BEE24.jpg (1080x1070, 167.74K)

.

Attached: 7F89EACA-505C-417B-A4B4-9C35B3915945.jpg (1034x623, 212.33K)

,

Attached: 0B89B8AB-B78C-4E35-A77D-6545474AF5FF.jpg (1334x750, 219.49K)

-

Attached: D301EE2D-DD38-4B7B-AC8E-48D8ED087D2E.jpg (1079x1390, 900.98K)

Attached: 36132725-F968-40E0-8280-0AF94460DDD9.jpg (1024x425, 58.25K)

Attached: 1710823B-CC11-4D3C-8F1F-ECC83DC6DD48.jpg (1242x2314, 1.93M)

*

Attached: 71968CD2-4864-4E42-A64E-706C73EFADFE.jpg (795x1024, 89.65K)

>Pretty sure I can still measure the number of car crashes, against the total number of car crashes last month, the word "rate" still fits.
yes you can. rate still fits there in practice because the total number of cars is no likely to have dramatically increased.
the OP was specifically saying the rate has increased though. lets say the rate increased from 41% to 100%. would that be simply because there were more trannies? you could probably invent some mental gymnastics reason for it, but in reality thats not going to be the reason.
rate is how many trannicides per 100 trannies. if the number of trannies in existence doubles, the rate of trannicide could stay the same, probably would stay roughly the same all other things being equal.
the whole point of considering percentages is so that you dont get fooled by increases in raw numbers like total number of trannies.

Yeah funny they can get people fired for refusing to use their pronouns yet still have such high suicide rates. Almost as if they're not mentally sound, and I say that as someone who's been jaded and depressed since the age of 15. There's no hope for them.

(

Attached: 9C916AAD-340C-44E8-B418-A4AA4E3DC546.jpg (1024x1014, 201.01K)

The level of acceptance was never a decoding factor for necking, but now that you can decide to flip genders on a whim and wven children do it (or parents force the children) the rate of fake virtue signalling trannies is growing fast. They will then realise how unhappy they are and neck. True trannies with dysphoria are really really rare, most of them do it for attention now, so the necking rate is higher.
Simple as.

)

Attached: 46F78746-EF92-4056-9C0C-368951D34F9E.jpg (460x286, 33.13K)

>Are we really discussing petty semantics
btw, forgot to add that no we are not discussing semantics. its a important difference.

>said "of course it would if the number of trannies has increased".
stop being disingenous, that's not what I typed. Listen user I can gladly admit I was wrong or confused, but you don't have to use jeiwsh pipul on me and change the meaining of my words, or taking things out of context and all that, please don't.

It would've been funny if the mental illness wasn't spreading like a wildfire infiltrating all of your institutions. I mean they openly threaten your children now.

Attached: douk wat.jpg (363x333, 15.39K)

Rate doesn't tell about the absolute number, we don't know the total number of trannies. We only know a proportion

x|x
--^ 50%

xxx|xxx
-----^ 50%

xxxxxx|xxxxxx
-----------^ 50%

As you can see more or less trannies is the same thing for the rate. Obviously in the last case there are more trannies dying than the other two cases but we can't know that because we don't have rate AND absolute numbers

Veterans have the same if not higher suicide rate. You wanna clown on them too you un-American bastard?

Attached: veterans-day-thank-you-images-9.jpg (2121x1414, 1.84M)

You didn't use it correctly. Rate is a percentage and yes, it matters.

>no we are not discussing semantics.
semantics:
the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning
>what does "rate" mean

What kind of trolling modality is this, reality gaslighting?

I can fix her.

Yes. Very funny.

Bot post, but for everyone else, yes. If a vet cannot come to terms with having been a zogbot then he does not deserve redemption.

it is not what you typed, but it IS what you were saying. i did not misrepresent your argument.
you said
>It's basic math: if you have more cars, there will be more crashes.
showing you dont know what the word rate means. OP was not saying there are more suicides. he is saying there are more suicides per 100 trannies.
what if there were NOT more trannies? what if there were less? the rate of suicide can still go up. how would you explain it in that case? you would need something else since your explanation cannot be correct. which is the whole point of looking at the number per 100, rather than just the total number.
no problem if you think im fucking with you user. im getting bored of explaining it anyway. we can leave it here.

you might be the dumbest motherfucker in this thread

(OP)

Attached: photo_2022-07-21_21-57-31.jpg (680x680, 93.42K)

>You didn't use it correctly
Pretty sure I did, I could use examples of the word "rate" in a sentence and you guys will find a way like a technicality to say I'm wrong. Also, pretty sure this has to do with the fact that britflag asshole called me mentally-ill so of course let's try to drive this guy mad because this is Any Forums! I've been here long time anons, I know the drill.