What's this fucking leddit image try to imply here?

What's this fucking leddit image try to imply here?

Attached: 1658394403589.jpg (1080x1784, 196.65K)

>women's work was entirely ignored in the economy
And hence, not taxed at every step, which is why the jew had to destroy it. Now go order on Ubereats at a 300% markup goy, death by a thousand cuts.

retard

Attached: 12097589275892.png (486x302, 362.18K)

they re gay nigger faggot tranny kikes, everything they say emanates from that faggot first principle.

They always say nothing

That the cost of living was always high and that everyone was always going through humilitating drudgery to survive. This same nigger probably believes that white people are the most racist and that social trust never really existed because of systemic racism. In other words, brainwashed trash.

>cooking is a lot of work you guys
Funny, I can do it just fine on the side after 9 hours of work a day.
This, too.

Also the "unsophisticated" toys and so on is laughable. Us being able to afford them is a side effect of increased automation, which enables us to produce that stuff on a larger scale. It has nothing to do with the human labor put into it.

It's trying to imply that in the 50s, everyone was equal. Nobody had a different lifestyle from each other. All lived in a house the same size as any other, no family produced more than 2 children. BIPOC folx were treated well. If only we could return to 50s communist utopia.

Muh drive thru!!!

What about the man working at Ford standing 13 hours a day over a conveyor belt?

>Did you know people in the 1950s weren't literal bugmen?!
>Diapers were made of cloth!
>Your clothes were made of linen and wool instead of microplastic shedding synthetics!
>People ate vegetables and knew what was in their food! Corn syrup wasn't the 3rd ingredient by weight in bread!
>There wasn't even TikTok!!!

They're telling us that they won't survive the sharp and sudden collapse of the weimerican paragm
>Good

Attached: 1658105621627443.jpg (810x1024, 148.93K)

They're trying to say things are sooooooo much better now

Attached: 1657753073267.jpg (767x651, 128.55K)

mfw these self-avowed "anti-work" leftists quite literally have identical mindsets towards labor as soulless, jewish neoliberal billionaires

Attached: bradley laughing 2.jpg (800x450, 43.55K)

It perfectly demonstrates why women's rights are a mistake.

that the 50s were fucking great

Holy shit this is le edgy take. It's so absurd and retarded that it must be true

>women had to wash some clothes
omg the horror
>they also had to cook
OMG thats at least 30 minutes of time right there
>they couldnt afford to eat without canning food for the winter
yes, 1950s was literally medieval peasant life
>no heckin tv and only simple toys
imagine living without pieces of plastic and marvel movies
IMAGINE IT YOU FUCKING DRUMPFKINS!
children would be forced to PLAY SPORTS!
or USE THEIR IMAGINATIONS!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: 1645043417306.jpg (828x746, 424.52K)

>''Oh no, women had to look after the house or family instead of working a shitty dead end job for Mr Goldstein''
I will never understand how the fuck women got tricked into thinking that working a cash register is empowering

Attached: 1648410636672.gif (640x518, 3.96M)

>had to hang the wet clothes on a line behind the house
Oh no, the horror!

If a single man stayed single he would still have one income and become a magnet to a wife, making the forces in society trend towards families.

This pleb post wants to suggest that having a wife stay home was required for the husband to get his wage. If they were an infertile couple, surely this isn't true? If he remained single. But hey, paying some wagie to watch your kid for a few hours a day because you broke off relations with your family is so independent and cool, ya?

what is this reddit tard talking about?
the domestic connivance culture started with the Victorians and was fairly commonplace for the upper/middle class by the 10s and by the 50's was rather ubiquitous.
that culture made it posable for woman to run the house with limited effort in ways thought unthinkable 50 years before.

Why don't you go back and ask them.

Attached: protect pol.jpg (787x840, 798.43K)