I will start:
>New chronology, history before 1500 AD (invention of printing press) cannot be proven.
sauce ilya.it
ilya.it
ilya.it
Conspiracy theory you believe
Ian Hall
Other urls found in this thread:
cybis.se
unz.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Josiah Rogers
easily disproven by astronomical records. next schizo post. sage
Sebastian Young
None of what I beleive is a "conspiracy theory".
Robert Roberts
history before i was born cannot be proven
Logan Hall
This is the problem, they dont match.
Furthermore, the tropics dont match. Tropics of cancer and capricorn are from 4000 years ago yet no map exists with our age tropics (thay are not cancer and capricorn, sun rises in different constellations at equinox).
Samuel Wilson
That trees are producing oxygen so they can feast on us
Jaxon Young
Unz review make a collection of articles on this topic for those interested.
unz.com
Newton wrote on this en.wikipedia.org
Interesting reddit post
Ryder Sullivan
>New chronology
The originator of this theory was some russian guy that believes jerusalem in the old testament is actually referring to moscow
Jason Young
>history before 1500 AD (invention of printing press) cannot be proven
This is 100% true.
The stupidest is this thing though.
You have three men per oar, not three rovers on top of each other, but all in academia accepts it for fear of being seen as uneducated.
Adrian Cook
I am talking about en.wikipedia.org
Leo Reyes
Real numbers don't exist
Cooper Adams
>easily disproven by astronomical records
It's not.
You have no history, so you have nothing old you can see with your own eyes that disprove the Bible centric history we live in.
Carter Perez
Jesus christ resurrection
Ryder Morales
Orwell means urquelle in German.
Hardouin(?) was the first by the way.
Ryder Russell
Theropod bones are really dragon bones.
Ethan Sullivan
Current events within your lifetime can’t be proven either.
Ian Smith
While what you are saying is retarded, the fact is that most dinosaur skeletons are for about 80% incomplete.
Most of the skeleton is literally made up by people who believe they know how they were formed.
Thomas Anderson
The German Gunnar heinsohn took the same questions as the the Russian, but came up with much better answers.
Sebastian Anderson
Shills that post on here purposely make typos so it's easy to identify each other.
Gavin Thomas
Didn't they add like 1000 years to the timeline after the dark ages?
Luke Phillips
>oy vey goyim that's retarded
>check these facts
Jack Garcia
>Dark ages
en.wikipedia.org
,but yes the hypothesis claim,they (scholars for mistake) added 1000 years,(keep in mind the year 0 never existed because 0 as a concept did not exist in that period)
Lincoln Ortiz
Dinosaurs are fake and archeologists since Smithsonian/early 1900s cannot be trusted with their coverup of giants. Stop trusting your Jesuit sciences. Why do you do so?
Camden Edwards
Atlantis is actually talking about aztecs and mayans. Based on depictions of atlantis, and the supposed mythology, they are strikingly similair to the mayans and aztecs.
This leads to one of 2 possibilites.
1.) Atlantis is from stories brought over from the americas of aztec and mayan cities that were subject to embelishment as the stories were spread
2.)the atlantians left the eastern hemisphere to the americas and they influenced aztec and mayan civilizationspandt2